Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02065453

Disposable Energy Sources and Operating Room Time for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Over 600,000 hysterectomies are performed each year nationwide. Over 99% of these are accomplished laparoscopically in the investigators current surgical practice to allow women a quicker recovery than a traditional large incision. Disposable laparoscopic devices have been developed to assist in the completion of hysterectomies. These disposable energy sources are only used once, but offer an improved safety and energy profile in that they reliably control bleeding with little damage to surrounding tissue and potentially save time. Reusable energy instruments can be sterilized and reused for multiple cases. Operating room time is expensive. The investigators calculate that if 6.7 minutes of time can be saved using the disposable device, Ligasure (Covidien), versus the reusable Robi bipolar and Storz Laparoscopic Shears, the time savings could justify the cost of the device.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Saint Louis University

St Louis, Missouri, 63117, United States

About this study

This will be a randomized, prospective study. The investigators study design would have each patient serve as their own control. One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the disposable device, Ligasure (Covidien), and the other using the two reusable devices (Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic shears). It is the investigators standard practice that the attending surgeon is on the patient's left side while the resident physician is on the patients right. To eliminate the bias of surgical experience, the investigators will randomize the energy source used on each side for every case. Therefore, the number of cases performed by the attending surgeon with the disposable or reusable energy sources, will equal that of the less experienced resident surgeon.

The primary endpoint of this study would be the time difference between cauterizing one side of the uterine attachments, from the round ligament to the uterine artery on one side, to the time detaching the same tissues on the other side. The vesico-uterine peritoneum or "bladder flap", will always be transected from the left for consistency. Sealed, opaque envelopes will be randomized to determine which side of the uterus will get the single disposable instrument, and which will get the 2 reusable instruments.

A time savings of 6.7 minutes for the total case can also be explained by a 3.35 minute time savings PER SIDE of the uterine attachments, given each uterus has two "sides". There is no pre-existing data on time needed for coagulation and cutting of the vascular tissues. Based on experience, the investigators estimate that it takes on average about 20 min total time for vessel sealing, with an estimated variability that approximately 70% of the time, vessel sealing is done within 35 minutes. Given these estimates, and using a power of 0.8, the sample size needed is 45.

The primary endpoint of surgical time will be initially assessed for each individual patient by determining the difference between the half of the laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure performed with the disposable device, specifically the Ligasure (Covidien) and the half of the laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure performed with the two reusable devices (Robi Bipolar and Storz laparoscopic shears) and determining if the mean difference score summed across all patients differs significantly from zero. Subsequent analyses will examine surgical times for attending physicians and residents separately where those using the disposable device are compared to those using the two reusable devices with independent students t test or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test depending on the normality of the distributions. Parallel analyses will be performed for the secondary endpoint of estimated blood loss. Secondary endpoints of organ damage and other categorical intraoperative complications will be compared between the disposable and reusable device groups using chi-square and Fisher's Exact test.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 21 to 80 years of age
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy (prospectively)

Exclusion criteria

  • Under 21 years of age
  • Known or anticipated malignancy

Treatment and study plan

disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien)

Device

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the disposable device (Ligasure, Covidien). . We will randomize the side for each energy source used on each side for every case. The number of "sides" performed by the attending surgeon will equal that of the less experienced resident surgeon.

Other names: disposable device (Ligasure made by Covidien).

Reusable device

Device

One side of the uterine attachments would be transected using the reusable Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic

Other names: Robi bipolar and Storz laparoscopic

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Endpoint of This Study is Time Difference Between Cauterizing One Side of the Uterine Attachments, From the Round Ligament to the Uterine Artery on One Side, to the Time Detaching the Same Tissues on the Other Side

    Time frame: Primary outcome study data is collected with the first incision and completed with skin closure at the completion of the surgery.

    duration of surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St. Louis University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Feb 19, 2014
Registry last updated
Jun 14, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.