Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00219687

Dispatcher-Assisted Resuscitation Trial (DART)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions with compressions and ventilations versus dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions with compressions only improves survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

9 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

London Ambulance Service, London, England, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, a condition characterized by a person suddenly collapsing due to heart stoppage, is a leading cause of death in the United States. In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, survival is dependent upon what the American Heart Association has termed the chain of survival which includes quick activation of the 9-1-1 system, prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), early defibrillation, and qualified advanced life support care (paramedic care). CPR allows for some circulation and delivery of oxygen to vital organs when the heart is no longer beating on its own. However, in some instances, the citizen bystander has not been trained in CPR, presenting a circumstance where the cardiac arrest victim may not receive CPR until the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel (i.e., paramedics). The delay in CPR adversely affects outcome and dcreases the chance of survival. In response to this need, the EMS Division of Public Health - Seattle and King County developed and instituted telephone CPR instructions that could be provided "on-the-spot" during a cardiac arrest by the emergency medical (9-1-1) dispatcher. The instructions are designed to be given over the phone to persons who have not had previous CPR training so that they can initiate CPR prior to the arrival of EMS personnel and have been termed "dispatcher-assisted" CPR. The dispatcher instructions provided by the dispatch agencies of King County include the standard "full" CPR protocol of ventilations (breathing into the victim's mouth to inflate the lungs) and chest compressions(pumping on the patients chest to help circulate the blood). The ventilations oxygenate the blood while the chest compressions pump the oxygenated blood forward. This EMS program has led to a considerable increase in the proportion of cardiac arrest victims in King County that receive citizen bystander CPR prior to EMS arrival and has been associated with improved survival (appendix 1).

Comparison: Dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions with compressions and ventillations compared to dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions with compressions only.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Cardiac arrest events where CPR is not ongoing but a bystander is willing to attempt with assistance

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Cardiac arrest due to asphyxia, drowning, hanging, or electrocution

Treatment and study plan

dispatcher-assisted CPR with compressions & ventilations

Other

Delivery of telephone CPR instructions to lay callers with chest compressions and ventilations when the patient is identified to be in cardiac arrest

dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions with compressions only

Other

Delivery of telephone CPR instructions to lay callers with hands-only chest compressions when the patient is identified to be in cardiac arrest

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival to hospital discharge

    Time frame: varied

    assessed at hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neurological status at hospital discharge

    Time frame: varied

    assessed at hospital discharge

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Public Health - Seattle and King County

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial of Dispatcher-Assisted CPR:Chest Compression Alone Versus Chest Compression Plus Ventilation

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Sep 22, 2005
Registry last updated
Oct 29, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.