Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07398001

Discontinuation of Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the benefits and risks of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes in patients who previously underwent coronary intervention using a drug-coated balloon.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does stopping antiplatelet therapy after 12 months affect the risk of net adverse clinical events? Does stopping antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of bleeding compared with continuing treatment?

Researchers will compare patients who discontinue antiplatelet therapy with patients who continue antiplatelet therapy to determine the impact on clinical outcomes during follow-up.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to either discontinue or continue antiplatelet therapy Receive routine clinical follow-up through clinic visits or telephone contacts Be monitored for cardiovascular events and bleeding outcomes over time

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention is widely used for the treatment of coronary artery disease, traditionally involving implantation of drug-eluting stents. Although contemporary drug-eluting stents have improved safety and efficacy compared with earlier stent technologies, permanent metallic implants remain associated with long-term considerations, including restenosis, stent thrombosis, and the need for prolonged antiplatelet therapy.

Drug-coated balloon therapy represents an alternative revascularization strategy that delivers an antiproliferative drug to the coronary vessel wall without implantation of a permanent scaffold. This "leave-nothing-behind" approach has been adopted in specific clinical settings and has been increasingly applied in selected coronary lesions. The absence of a permanent implant may offer potential advantages with respect to long-term vessel healing and antiplatelet therapy management.

Bleeding complications after coronary intervention are clinically relevant and have been associated with adverse outcomes. Decisions regarding the duration of antiplatelet therapy require careful consideration of both ischemic and bleeding risks. While shorter durations of antiplatelet therapy have been explored following contemporary coronary interventions, optimal long-term antiplatelet strategies after drug-coated balloon-based procedures remain incompletely defined.

Limited data are available regarding the clinical outcomes associated with discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy beyond 12 months in patients who have undergone initial percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon treatment and have remained clinically stable. As a result, uncertainty persists regarding the balance of potential benefits and risks of long-term antiplatelet therapy in this population.

This prospective, randomized, multicenter study is designed to compare clinical outcomes between patients who discontinue antiplatelet therapy and those who continue antiplatelet therapy after 12 months following drug-coated balloon-based percutaneous coronary intervention. The study aims to provide additional evidence to inform clinical decision-making regarding antiplatelet therapy management in patients treated with drug-coated balloons.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 19 years or older who are able to understand the risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives of the study and who provide written informed consent voluntarily.
  • Patients who underwent drug-coated balloon treatment at least 12 months prior to enrollment.
  • Patients who have not experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization, since the index DCB treatment.
  • Patients who have not experienced major bleeding since the index DCB treatment.
  • Patients who are receiving antiplatelet therapy at the time of enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with concomitant vascular disease requiring long-term antiplatelet therapy.
  • Patients with non-cardiac comorbid conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, are associated with a life expectancy of less than 1 year or may result in poor compliance with the study protocol.
  • Patients who are participating in another drug or coronary device clinical study at the time of enrollment.

Treatment and study plan

Stop Antiplatelet

Drug

Antiplatelet discontinuation after DCB treatment

Continue Antiplatelet

Drug

Antiplatelet continuation after DCB treatment

Primary outcomes

  1. Net adverse clinical events (NACE)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after randomization

    A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.

    Non-fatal myocardial infarction is defined as a myocardial infarction diagnosed using standard clinical, electrocardiographic, and biomarker criteria that does not result in death.

Secondary outcomes

  1. NACE

    Time frame: Up to 24, 36 months after randomization

    A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.

  2. The single components of the primary endpoint

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.

  3. Rate of cardiac death

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    Cardiac death is defined as death resulting from an immediate cardiac cause, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, fatal arrhythmia, or sudden cardiac death. Deaths of unknown cause or unwitnessed deaths without an identifiable non-cardiac cause are also classified as cardiac death. Deaths clearly attributable to non-cardiac causes, such as malignancy, infection, trauma, or other non-cardiovascular conditions, are not considered cardiac death.

  4. Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    Stroke is defined as a new, sudden onset of a focal or global neurological deficit lasting 24 hours or longer, or resulting in death, with a vascular cause. Both ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke are included. The diagnosis is confirmed by clinical assessment and supported by brain imaging when available. Transient ischemic attacks (TIA), defined as neurological symptoms resolving within 24 hours without evidence of infarction or hemorrhage, are not considered stroke.

  5. Target lesion failure

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    A composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization.

  6. Angina severity measured with Seattle Angina Questionnaires

    Time frame: At baseline and 12 months after randomization

    Angina severity is assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a validated, patient-reported questionnaire designed to measure the impact of angina on daily life. The questionnaire evaluates angina-related symptoms, physical limitation, and quality of life. Higher scores indicate fewer angina symptoms and better functional status. Changes in SAQ scores over time are used to assess angina severity during follow-up.

  7. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    Cost-effectiveness is defined as an economic evaluation comparing the costs and clinical outcomes of the study treatment strategies. Direct medical costs related to treatment, follow-up care, hospitalizations, and management of clinical events are assessed and compared in relation to clinical outcomes during the follow-up period. Cost-effectiveness is evaluated to determine the relative economic value of discontinuing versus continuing antiplatelet therapy.

  8. Sex difference in NACE

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    Sex differences are assessed by comparing the incidence of NACE between male and female participants during follow-up.

  9. Comparison of NACE in DM patients

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    NACE in patients with diabetes mellitus is assessed as a composite of ischemic and bleeding events during follow-up after randomization.

  10. NACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome

    Time frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

    Acute coronary syndrome was defined as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Eun-Seok Shin, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+82-10-6319-4025

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ulsan University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2030
First posted
Feb 9, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.