Hyperbolic tapering
DrugThe dose will be reduced by 20-25% every 2 weeks.
NCT Number: NCT07393919
Overprescribing and long-term use of antidepressants (ADs) are common and may increase the risk of adverse effects and withdrawal symptoms when discontinuation is attempted. Although several discontinuation strategies have been proposed, empirical evidence comparing different tapering approaches is limited. In particular, hyperbolic tapering has been suggested as a potentially safer and more effective alternative to standard linear tapering, but no randomized trials have directly compared these strategies.
This study is a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority randomized trial designed to compare two antidepressant discontinuation strategies-linear tapering and hyperbolic tapering-in adults with remitted depressive disorders. Eligible participants are adults aged 18 years or older with currently remitted depressive disorders who have been taking antidepressants for at least six months and are considered clinically appropriate candidates for discontinuation.
Participants will be recruited in outpatient psychiatric settings, with the involvement of general practitioners and other medical specialists. After baseline assessment, participants will be randomized to either a linear tapering strategy, consisting of dose reductions of 50% of the minimal effective dose every two weeks until discontinuation, or a hyperbolic tapering strategy, consisting of proportional dose reductions of approximately 20-25% every two weeks until discontinuation. Follow-up assessments will be conducted regularly over a 36-week period.
The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who fail to discontinue the antidepressant within the predefined tapering schedule (allowing a limited tolerance period) or who re-initiate antidepressant treatment during the 16 weeks following discontinuation. Secondary outcomes include measures of safety, tolerability, acceptability, clinical effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness, as well as withdrawal symptoms, relapse of depressive or anxiety symptoms, and adherence to the tapering schedule.
Participants and recruiting clinicians will not be blinded to treatment allocation, while outcome assessors and the biostatistician will remain blinded until completion of the study to minimize detection bias. The study aims to provide pragmatic evidence to inform clinical practice and guideline development regarding optimal strategies for antidepressant discontinuation.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Antidepressants (ADs) are effective in the treatment of moderate-to-severe depression and anxiety disorders and are recommended by national and international clinical guidelines, although concerns about over-prescribing persist. In Italy, AD consumption increased by over 10% between 2014 and 2020. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) account for approximately 70% of AD prescriptions and around half of total AD-related expenditure. Across most countries, AD prescribing has increased steadily, largely driven by use in general practice and by longer treatment duration.
For individuals experiencing a first depressive episode, evidence-based guidelines recommend continuing AD treatment for 6-9 months after clinical response. Meta-analytic evidence suggests a similar risk of relapse for maintenance periods ranging from six months to over one year. Treatment duration may vary according to illness severity and recurrence, with at least two years commonly recommended in cases of multiple episodes with functional impairment. In Italy, approximately one in three individuals continue AD treatment beyond 12 months, raising concerns about potentially inappropriate long-term or indefinite prescribing.
Prolonged AD use is associated with an increased risk of long-term adverse effects, including sexual dysfunction, weight gain, emotional blunting, and cardiovascular conditions. Discontinuation of ADs may also lead to withdrawal symptoms, which can be clinically relevant in a substantial proportion of patients. Several clinical factors appear to increase the risk of withdrawal, and it has been suggested that, for some individuals, disabling withdrawal symptoms rather than relapse may be the primary reason for unsuccessful discontinuation.
Randomized controlled trials indicate that discontinuing ADs is associated with a higher risk of relapse compared with continuation. However, discontinuation schedules used in many trials are rapid or abrupt, potentially increasing withdrawal symptoms that may be misclassified as relapse and thereby inflating relapse estimates. There is broad agreement that gradual tapering may reduce withdrawal symptoms, but most clinical guidelines provide only generic recommendations, often implying a linear dose reduction approach that remains standard in routine practice.
Alternative tapering strategies have been proposed, most notably hyperbolic tapering, which involves proportional dose reductions over longer periods. This approach is based on the nonlinear relationship between dose and receptor occupancy and may require tapering periods ranging from several months to over one year. Hyperbolic tapering often necessitates very low doses that are not readily achievable with standard marketed formulations, raising feasibility, regulatory, and policy challenges. To date, no randomized trials have directly compared different tapering strategies.
Against this background, there is a clear need for experimental evidence comparing hyperbolic and linear tapering approaches in routine clinical practice. The DISCARD study is a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial designed to address this gap by comparing hyperbolic versus linear tapering in adults with currently remitted depressive disorders who have been taking ADs for at least six months and for whom discontinuation is clinically appropriate.
Participants will be recruited across four university psychiatric units in Italy, with methodological support provided by a fifth academic centre. General practitioners and other specialists will be involved in identifying potentially eligible individuals. After providing informed consent and completing baseline assessments, participants will be randomized to either a linear or a hyperbolic tapering strategy according to predefined schedules tailored to the starting dose. Follow-up assessments will be conducted regularly over a 36-week period using validated measures of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, withdrawal symptoms, quality of life, and social functioning. Outcome assessors and the biostatistician will remain blinded to treatment allocation.
The primary outcome is the proportion of participants who fail to discontinue the AD within the predefined tapering schedule or who re-initiate AD treatment during the 16 weeks following discontinuation. Secondary outcomes include non-adherence to the tapering schedule, occurrence and severity of withdrawal symptoms, clinical relapse, early study discontinuation, and use of predefined rescue strategies. This study is designed to generate pragmatic evidence on the comparative effectiveness, feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness of hyperbolic versus linear tapering strategies in everyday clinical practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The dose will be reduced by 20-25% every 2 weeks.
Dose will be reduced by fixed amounts (generally 50% of the minimum effective dose) every 2 weeks.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Proportion of participants who fail to successfully discontinue the antidepressant treatment, defined as either:
Time frame: Up to the end of the predefined tapering period
Proportion of participants who do not complete antidepressant discontinuation by the end of the predefined tapering schedule, regardless of reason
Time frame: Up to 16 weeks after complete antidepressant discontinuation
Proportion of participants who restart any antidepressant medication for any reason after successful completion of the tapering schedule.
Time frame: Up to the end of the predefined tapering period
Proportion of participants who deviate from the predefined tapering schedule for any reason.
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
A mean of the highest scores reached by each patient on the modified Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms Scale (DESS)
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
This includes people who do not attend follow-up visits and cannot be contacted, people who refuse to be involved in follow-up assessments, or people who die during the tapering or the follow-up for reasons unrelated to withdrawal symptoms or relapse.
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Proportion of participants requiring one or more "rescue strategies" (ie, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, or other mediacations) to address withdrawal symptoms during the tapering phase and the 16-weeks follow-up period
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Time elapsed from randomization to clinical relapse, defined as having at least moderately severe depression or anxiety symptoms, namely a score ≥15 on the PHQ-9 or ≥10 on the GAD-7, up until the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Proportion of participants experiencing "withdrawal-associated relapse", defined as having a score ≥15 on the PHQ-9 or ≥10 on the GAD-7 within 4 weeks after the participant experienced "clinically relevant" withdrawal symptoms during the tapering phase and the 16-weeks follow-up period
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
PHQ-9 mean overall score at the end of 16-weeks follow-up period
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
GAD-7 mean overall score at the end of 16-weeks follow-up period
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Proportion of participants with suicidal behaviours (including suicidal ideation, as reported by the participant, or according to a score ≥2 on the item 9 of the PHQ-9, suicide attempt, and deaths by suicide) at the end of 16-weeks follow-up period
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) mean score on the Mental Component Summary at the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Time frame: Up to the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS) mean score at the end of the 16-weeks follow-up period
Universita di Verona
Other
Safe Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Individuals With Clinically Remitted Depressive Disorders
Acronym: DISCARD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07553364
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07684521
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07664540
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07631247
Alzheimer Disease, Behavior
View Trial Details