University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Aakash Desai, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Margaret Thomas, MPH
CONTACT
Maya Khalil, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06364917
The purpose of this study, known as DISCERN, is to compare two different treatments for a type of lung cancer called non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that does not show a marker known as PD-L1. This study will help us understand if using two types of immune therapy together with chemotherapy is better than using one type of immune therapy with chemotherapy. We're doing this by looking at changes in the subject's cancer's DNA in the blood after starting treatment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Aakash Desai, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Margaret Thomas, MPH
CONTACT
Maya Khalil, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
targeted therapy for NSCLC exists in first line (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, RET, NTRK, and MET sensitizing mutations
Exclusion criteria
The dosing regimens for Pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W), are based on established FDA-approved dosages for the treatment of NSCLC, ensuring a balance between efficacy and tolerability. These doses are selected based on extensive clinical experience indicating optimal response rates with manageable safety profiles in the target population. The route of administration (intravenous) is chosen for its direct delivery into the bloodstream, ensuring maximum bioavailability and consistency of dosing.
The combination therapy dosages for Carboplatin are aligned with standard chemotherapy protocols for NSCLC, tailored to minimize toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This dosing strategy is justified by previous phase 3 trials demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of these regimens in advanced NSCLC patients.
The combination therapy dosages for Paclitaxel are aligned with standard chemotherapy protocols for NSCLC, tailored to minimize toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This dosing strategy is justified by previous phase 3 trials demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of these regimens in advanced NSCLC patients.
The combination therapy dosages for Pemetrexed are aligned with standard chemotherapy protocols for NSCLC, tailored to minimize toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This dosing strategy is justified by previous phase 3 trials demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of these regimens in advanced NSCLC patients.
The dosing regimens for Nivolumab (360 mg Q3W) are based on established FDA-approved dosages for the treatment of NSCLC, ensuring a balance between efficacy and tolerability. These doses are selected based on extensive clinical experience indicating optimal response rates with manageable safety profiles in the target population. The route of administration (intravenous) is chosen for its direct delivery into the bloodstream, ensuring maximum bioavailability and consistency of dosing.
The dosing regimens for Ipilimumab (1 mg/kg Q6W) are based on established FDA-approved dosages for the treatment of NSCLC, ensuring a balance between efficacy and tolerability. These doses are selected based on extensive clinical experience indicating optimal response rates with manageable safety profiles in the target population. The route of administration (intravenous) is chosen for its direct delivery into the bloodstream, ensuring maximum bioavailability and consistency of dosing.
Time frame: Baseline to 64 days (C4D1)
To assess and quantify the rate of molecular response, defined as the complete disappearance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from baseline levels, by Cycle 4 Day 1 (C4D1). This study compares patients with PD-L1 negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with a dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) plus chemotherapy (CT) strategy against those receiving a single ICB plus CT regimen. The objective explores whether the addition of a second ICB enhances the molecular response when integrated into standard chemoimmunotherapy protocols in this specific patient population.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
To determine the Overall Response Rate (ORR) in patients receiving dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) plus chemotherapy (CT) and those receiving single ICB plus CT. The ORR will be assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
To investigate the correlation between ctDNA responses at Cycle 4 Day 1 (C4D1) and traditional RECIST v1.1 criteria in patients receiving dual versus single ICB plus CT. The analysis aims to validate ctDNA as a predictive biomarker for treatment response.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
To evaluate the median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) among patients treated with dual immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) plus chemotherapy (CT) compared to those receiving single ICB plus CT. The aim is to evaluate the impact of the combined treatment strategy on disease progression.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
To evaluates the median Overall Survival (OS) in patients receiving dual ICB plus CT versus those treated with single ICB plus CT, offering insights into the long-term benefits of these treatment regimens.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
To assess the tolerability of dual versus single ICB plus CT strategies using patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The focus is on evaluating the patient experience and side effect profiles associated with these treatment options in patients with PD-L1 negative advanced NSCLC.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Aakash Desai, MD, MPH
CONTACT
Margaret Thomas, MPH
CONTACT
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
DISCERN: Dual Immune Strategy Versus Single Checkpoint Inhibition Efficacy Response in PDL-1 Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06540196
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06694454
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04928846
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06150664
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Margate, Florida, United States
View Trial Details