Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01816841

Direct Visual Fluorescence in Finding Oral Cancer in High-Risk Patients and Patients Undergoing Routine Dental Care

This clinical trial studies direct visual fluorescence in finding oral cancer in high-risk patients and patients undergoing routine dental care. Diagnostic procedures, such as direct visual fluorescence, may help find and diagnose oral cancer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the diagnostic benefit of the VELscope (direct visual fluorescence) inspection in oral examination.

II. Efficacy of the VELscope in identifying dysplastic (premalignant) and malignant oral mucosal lesions and in discriminating these lesions from common benign tissue changes.

III. Accuracy of clinical judgment versus VELscope findings. IV. Ability of the VELscope to identify lesions or extent of lesions beyond what is clinically apparent.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo conventional oral examination (COE) followed by direct visual fluorescence examination (DVFE). Patients with tissue abnormalities found by COE or DVFE undergo scalpel biopsy within 2 weeks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • HIGH-RISK POPULATION:
  • 33 consecutive consenting patients presenting to The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Otolaryngology Department with a suspicious oral lesion or prior biopsy-confirmed epithelial dysplasia (mild, moderate, severe), carcinoma in situ (CIS), or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) will be recruited; adult patients presenting for initial evaluation for treatment planning and/or presenting for follow-up appointments monitoring for recurrence will be eligible to participate
  • GENERAL POPULATION:
  • 250 consecutive consenting patients presenting to The Ohio State University College of Dentistry for routing dental care will be recruited; adult patients presenting to the screening clinic for initial oral evaluation will be eligible to participate

Treatment and study plan

fluorescence imaging

Procedure

Undergo DVFE

Biopsy

Procedure

Undergo scalpel biopsy

Other names: biopsies

examination

Procedure

Undergo COE

Other names: Exam, Medical Assessment, Medical Exam, Medical Examination, Medical Inspection

Comparison of surgical margins by COE vs. DVFE

Procedure

Surgical margin determination using DVFE

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of DVFE compared to visual inspection by conventional oral examination alone

    Time frame: At the time of examination

    Will be evaluated by calculating sensitivity and specificity and their corresponding exact 95% confidence intervals. Association between the two techniques will be assessed using the simple kappa statistic.

  2. Differences between lesional margins identified by COE and DVFE

    Time frame: At the time of examination

    Will be evaluated using the dependent t-test. In the event that the parametric requirements of this test are not met, the Wilcoxon, matched-pairs, signed-ranks test will be used.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Role of Direct Visual Fluorescence in Oral Examination

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 22, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.