bariatric surgery
ProcedureThe intervention is not assigned to the participant after recruitment in the study, rather the intervention is an inclusion criteria for participation in the study.
NCT Number: NCT06538948
Bariatric surgery (BS), especially procedures like Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), is the most effective treatment for obesity. Yet, the exact mechanisms governing its effect are somewhat elusive, with current research mainly focusing on post-operative food intake outcomes based on self-reported data, which might not fully capture the nuanced changes in eating behaviours.
To address these gaps, our study plans to employ the newly developed "drinkometer", a device capable of analysing the intricate changes in drinking behaviour following BS. This tool promises to bring a more detailed perspective to the changes in ingestive behaviours, bypassing the inaccuracies of self-reporting methods. By expanding our research to encompass diverse patient demographics and examining potential links to physiological shifts like gut hormone level alterations, the study aims to provide a more rounded understanding of the long-term impacts of BS on eating behaviours.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Hospital Männedorf, Männedorf, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
HYPOTHESIS AND PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
So far, studies of ingestive behaviour in humans have produced ambiguous results. Moreover, direct measurements of ingestive behaviour in humans after BS are still rare and the roles of sex and gut hormones, as well as their relevance for clinical outcome parameters, such as body weight loss, remain elusive. A comprehensive understanding of how a given intervention such as BS affects food intake requires a detailed analysis of the ingestive behaviour itself, not simply the measurement of the outcome of the behaviour. In other words, the information on how the food is consumed is equally or even more important than the information on how much food has been ingested.
This study employs the drinkometer methodology to perform direct measurements of ingestive behaviour in male and female human patients after SG and RYGB along with parallel measurements of postprandial gut hormone levels. Furthermore, this study investigates the clinical relevance of changes in ingestive behaviour by correlating microstructural parameters with body weight loss in a consecutive set of patients who received RYGB at the University Hospital Zurich five years before the time of recruitment.
Of note, the proposed experiments aim to test specific hypotheses regarding the behavioural mechanisms underlying potential changes in food intake after BS in humans. Thus, this research do not aim to identify how BS affects one or the other single microstructural parameters of eating or drinking. Instead, this study investigates how a given intervention that is known to substantially affect food intake behaviour - such as BS - alters the profile of a group of microstructural parameters of ingestive behaviour in humans. Given that ingestive behaviour represents the readout of the central nervous system mechanisms controlling energy intake (e.g., palatability, aversion, avoidance, satiation), the results of the proposed studies will inform the search for the underlying neural circuits in the brain that are specifically altered by BS. If there is no altered behaviour, there would be no point in investigating the underlying physiology. More specifically, this study aims to:
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ENDPOINTS
In the research protocol, the primary and secondary outcomes specific to each of the three studies planned within the research project have been described. Recognising that each study has its unique objectives and hypotheses, the outcomes have been specified distinctly for each study to ensure clarity and focus in the research approach.
For each of the three studies, the primary outcomes are those key results that the study is primarily designed to assess. These are the main effects or findings that are anticipated to provide the most significant insights into the research questions. Secondary outcomes, while still important, are additional results that can be explored after answering the main research questions. These might provide supplementary information, support the primary outcomes, or offer insights into other areas related to the main research question.
By presenting these outcomes separately for each study, this study aims to provide a structured and transparent overview of the research intentions, allowing for a clear understanding of the objectives and measures in each specific part of the project. This approach not only aids in maintaining the focus and integrity of each study but also assists in the clear communication of the research goals and methods.
PROJECT DESIGN
The proposed studies will test key elements of ingestive behaviour and their relation to pre- and postprandial levels of gut hormones as well as sex differences after the two most frequently performed bariatric operations. They will thus provide useful information for planning and conducting future trials in the field, such as optimal recruitment and retention strategies, intervention delivery, data collection methods and adherence to study protocols. The proposed studies will further provide empirical estimates of effect sizes of bariatric surgery and long-term associations of ingestive behaviour with gut hormones for post-bariatric body weight loss. The potential outcomes of Studies 1, 2 and 3 are conceptually different. Nevertheless, the results of these studies will complement each other as well as our findings from previous studies, and can be used to calculate sample sizes for future trials.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention is not assigned to the participant after recruitment in the study, rather the intervention is an inclusion criteria for participation in the study.
Time frame: One year after bariatric surgery
Difference of the eleven microstructural parameters of ingestive behaviour within the cohorts with intervention at the end of follow-up compared to baseline measurements and differences between the cohorts with intervention and the cohorts without intervention will be measured with a drinkometer device. The microstructural parameters of ingestive behaviour are: mean suck energy intake (kcal), mean suck duration (s), mean suck rate (kcal/s), mean suck maximal rate (kcal/s), burst number (n), burst energy intake (kcal), burst duration (s), burst rate (kcal/s), number of sucks per burst (n), inter-burst intervals (s), and inter-suck intervals (s). On this platform, a separate entry for the eleven microstructural parameters is not done to avoid redundancy in the description.
Time frame: One year after bariatric surgery
This study investigates the effect of pre- and post-prandial levels of gut hormones on the eleven microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior. These are: mean suck energy intake (kcal), mean suck duration (s), mean suck rate (kcal/s), mean suck maximal rate (kcal/s), burst number (n), burst energy intake (kcal), burst duration (s), burst rate (kcal/s), number of sucks per burst (n), inter-burst intervals (s), and inter-suck intervals (s). On this platform, a separate entry for the eleven microstructural parameters is not done to avoid redundancy in the description. The study focuses on the influence of the following gut hormones: leptin, ghrelin, cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), amylin, peptide YY (PYY), and insulin. These hormone concentrations are measured both pre- and post-prandially in the blood and are expressed in their respective units of measure (e.g., leptin in ng/mL, ghrelin in pg/mL).
Time frame: One year after bariatric surgery
This study investigates the effect of biological sex (male or female) on the eleven microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior. These parameters are: mean suck energy intake (kcal), mean suck duration (s), mean suck rate (kcal/s), mean suck maximal rate (kcal/s), burst number (n), burst energy intake (kcal), burst duration (s), burst rate (kcal/s), number of sucks per burst (n), inter-burst intervals (s), and inter-suck intervals (s). On this platform, a separate entry for the eleven microstructural parameters is not done to avoid redundancy in the description. The study focuses on comparing these parameters between males and females to understand the influence of biological sex on ingestive behavior.
Time frame: Five years after bariatric surgery
Identification of clusters of good and poor response to RYGB five years after surgery based on the variance of the single microstructural parameters of ingestive behaviour
Time frame: Five years after bariatric surgery
This study aims to investigate the correlation between percentage excess body mass index (BMI) loss (%EBMIL) and microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior, measured using the Drinkometer device, five years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. The eleven microstructural parameters considered are: mean suck energy intake (kcal), mean suck duration (s), mean suck rate (kcal/s), mean suck maximal rate (kcal/s), burst number (n), burst energy intake (kcal), burst duration (s), burst rate (kcal/s), number of sucks per burst (n), inter-burst intervals (s), and inter-suck intervals (s).
This study explores how these microstructural parameters of ingestive behavior correlate with the long-term success of RYGB surgery as indicated by %EBMIL. By understanding these correlations, we aim to gain insights into the behavioral mechanisms that contribute to the maintenance of weight loss post-surgery.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Marco Bueter, MD, DPhil
CONTACT
Michele Serra, PhD
CONTACT
University of Zurich
Other
Acronym: DIBASH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06619041
Behavior, Body Weight
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06858761
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06374875
Body Weight, Digestive System Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06325722
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details