Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Capital Region, 2100, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT04409119
The study will investigate the feasibility of using direct HIS pacing or left bundle branch pacing (LBB pacing) as an alternative to biventricular pacing in patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ECG with a typical left bundle branch block pattern.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Copenhagen, Capital Region, 2100, Denmark
Biventricular pacing has for more than a decade been standard of care for patients with HFrEF, LVEF < 35%, NYHA II-IV despite optimal medical treatment and an ECG with left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, it is not always ideal because of several drawbacks such as phrenic nerve capture, inability to reach late activated areas and many more. Direct HIS pacing can in many cases capture the left bundle and provide normal electrical activation of the left ventricle but sometimes with high pacing thresholds. Recently direct left bundle branch pacing has shown promise with synchronous activation of the left ventricle at low pacing thresholds.
In the present study we randomize 150 patients in two centres to either conventional CRT (50 patients) or HIS/LBB pacing (100 patients). In the HIS/LBB arm, direct HIS-pacing is attempted first but if its not possible or the pacing threshold for capturing the left bundle branch is > 2.5 V at 1 ms we switch to placing a LBB-lead.
Power calculation for non-inferiority: With the 50 patients in the first His Alternative study (25 Biv-CRT og 25 His-CRT) we observed a fall in systolic volumes of 34% and 46% with a standard deviation of 13-16%. Using these numbers it would take at least 108 patients to be 90% sure that the lower limit of a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval (equal to a 95% two-sided confidence interval) would be over the non-inferiority limit of -10%.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Typical left bundle branch block:
QRS width > 130 msec for women and > 140 msec for men QS or rS pattern in leads V1 and V2, and mid-QRS plateau phase with or without extras in at least 2 of leads V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL
Exclusion criteria
3830 lead to HIS or LBB
LV lead in a CS branch
Time frame: 6 months
Echocardiographic response after 6 months defined as decrease in left ventricular systolic volume
Time frame: 6 months
The success rate of implanting a pacing lead to the HIS-bundle with capture of the left bundle at a threshold < 2.5 V at 1 ms or implantation of a LBB lead with narrowing of the QRS duration and maintaining this effect at 6 month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Echocardiographic response assessed by chamber dimensions and LVEF on a continuous scale
Time frame: 6 months
Functional response after 6 months defined as an increase in 6-min walking distance of ≥ 20% of the initial value
Time frame: 6 months
Symptomatic response after 6 months defined as a fall in NYHA class of ≥ 1
Time frame: 6 months
Change in well-being after 6 months defined as a decrease in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure score of ≥ 15% of baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Shortening the duration of the QRS complex defined as the widest paced QRS complex rated at 12-lead ECG after 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Change in NT-pro BNP value
Time frame: 6 months
Device-related complications (periprocedural: electrode reoperation, pneumothorax, hemothorax, pericardial bleeding/tamponade and later (after 30 days post implantation): LV/HIS electrode reoperation, change of device due to battery depletion and infection requiring extraction).
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Other
Direct HIS/LBB Pacing as an Alternative to Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure Despite Optimal Medical Treatment and an ECG With a Typical Left Bundle Branch Block Pattern.
Acronym: HIS-alt_2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03803995
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bundle-Branch Block
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04180696
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bundle-Branch Block
Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei
View Trial DetailsNCT05572736
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bundle-Branch Block
Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03567096
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bundle-Branch Block
Montreal, Canada
View Trial Details