Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03383120

Diode Laser for Treatment of Peri-implantitis

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Geneva

Geneva, Genève 4, 1211, Switzerland

About this study

Peri-implantitis is a major complication for dental implant patients, with its prevalence estimated in the order of 10% of implants and 20% of patients after 5 to 10 years of implant placement. When left untreated, peri-implantitis may cause progressive tissue destruction, esthetic complications and, eventually, implant loss. Despite numerous clinical trials and systematic reviews, studies have failed to identify a standardized protocol for the treatment of such conditions. Still, current literature and expert opinions recommend mechanical debridement of the implant followed by early evaluation and surgical intervention, implant decontamination using a wide variety of mechanical and chemical methods, then adjunctive systematic antibiotics. However, given the aggressive nature of surgical interventions, the inherent difficulty of decontaminating the implants' rough surfaces with conventional methods, in addition to the growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, the search for alternative approaches has become imperative. Since implant decontamination is the key aspect to resolution of peri-implantitis, different mechanical and chemical methods have been tested in that respect. In recent years, lasers have been attracting significant attention in this particular field. Diode lasers, in particular, have been shown to have potent bactericidal and photobiomodulatory effects promoting wound healing and tissue regeneration. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application in comparison with conventional surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions following an observation period of one year.

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year.

40 subjects will be randomly distributed into two parallel groups:

  • Test group (n= 20); receiving non-surgical mechanical debridement and adjunctive diode laser application at days 0, 7 and 14.
  • Control group (n= 20); receiving initial mechanical debridement at day 0, followed by open flap debridement and prescription of post-operative systemic antimicrobials at day 14.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • At least one solid screw-type titanium implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis; which is defined as at least one site with probing depth ≥5mm, bleeding on probing and/or suppuration, and radiographic evidence of crater-form bone loss ≥2 threads after insertion of the final prosthetic supra-structure.
  • Sound prosthetic supra-structure.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to Amoxicillin and/or Metronidazole,
  • Systemic diseases that could compromise wound healing (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV or bone metabolic disorders), radiation or immunosuppressive therapy,
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding,
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse,
  • Heavy smokers consuming >10 cigarettes/day,
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
  • Participants not willing to attend regular dental maintenance visits and follow-up evaluations,
  • Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
  • Previous enrolment into the current study,
  • Active periodontal disease.

Treatment and study plan

Laser treatment

Device

Laser treatment of the peri-implantitis lesion includes mechanical debridement of the implant using an ultrasonic device and plastic curettes followed by diode laser sub-mucosal application for 90 seconds. This is repeated two more times at one-week intervals.

Other names: Test

Surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics

Procedure

Mechanical debridement of the implant will be done in a similar manner to the test group (without laser application) followed by open flap debridement 2 weeks after, and post-operative prescription of Amoxicillin and Metronidazole systemic antibiotics 3 times per day for a period of 1 week

Other names: Control

Primary outcomes

  1. Resolution of the peri-implantitis

    Time frame: 12 months

    Defined as A absence of probing depths > 4 mm, bleeding on probing or suppuration at the end of the observation period

  2. Types and frequencies of adverse events

    Time frame: 12 months

    Any adverse events related or unrelated to the treatment administered is recorded at the time and appropriate treatment is performed. The frequency, duration and intensity is also recorded.

  3. Patient reported outcomes at 1 week

    Time frame: 1 week post-operatively

    A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate post-operative discomfort and patient's perception of the administered treatment 1 week post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating absence of pain and 100 being the worst pain imaginable.

  4. Patient reported outcomes at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate general patient's perception of the administered treatment 12 months post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating lack of discomfort or pain and complete satisfaction and 100 being completely unsatisfied and/or with persisting pain or other symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in marginal bone levels

    Time frame: 12 months

    Changes in peri-implant marginal bone levels are measured on intra-oral radiographs taken at baseline and 12 months post-operatively. Two independent examiners perform measurements and mean values are taken. This outcome is only calculated 12 months postoperatively.

  2. Differences between groups regarding changes in mean marginal bone level changes

    Time frame: 12 months

    Comparison in mean marginal bone level changes (outcome 4) are performed between the test and control groups

  3. Number of residual pockets > 4 mm

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of residual peri-implant pockets exceeding 4 mm are measured around all included implants at the end of the observation period to asses the presence of any residual peri-implant soft-tissue inflammation

  4. Changes in probing depth

    Time frame: 12 months

    The change in mean probing depth between baseline and 12 months is calculated to assess treatment outcomes and disease resolution around all included implants. This outcome is calculated only once 12 months post-operatively.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Geneva, Switzerland

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis and Non-surgical Debridement With Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy

Acronym: LAS

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 26, 2017
Registry last updated
May 4, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.