Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Dentistry
Kirikkale, Kırıkkale, 71100, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07524153
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of diode laser and combined treatment protocols, applied in addition to mechanical debridement, in the treatment of peri-implantitis on clinical periodontal parameters and S100A8 levels in peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF).
Methods: A total of 39 patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis were divided into three groups based on the treatment protocols used: Mechanical Debridement, Diode Laser, and Combined Treatment. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, modified plaque index, gingival index, and PISF volume measurements were recorded at baseline and at weeks 4 and 12. S100A8 levels in PISF samples were measured by ELISA.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Kirikkale, Kırıkkale, 71100, Turkey (Türkiye)
This study included 39 functional implants in patients aged 30-65 diagnosed with peri-implantitis (PD ≥6 mm, no clinical mobility). Participants were assigned to three groups (n=13 per group) using simple randomization (coin toss) performed by an independent researcher: Group 1 (Mechanical debridement only), Group 2 (940 nm diode laser monotherapy), and Group 3 (Combined mechanical debridement and diode laser). Exclusion criteria consisted of systemic diseases, smoking or alcohol consumption, pregnancy/lactation, parafunctional habits, and recent use of antibiotics (within 6 months) or peri-implant treatment (within 3 months). At baseline, clinical parameters were recorded and peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) samples were collected. Specifically, probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at 6 sites per implant, while the modified plaque index (mPI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed at 4 sites per implant.
Prior to PISF sampling, supragingival plaque was removed using sterile curettes, and the area was isolated and air-dried. Samples were collected from mesial and distal sites using paper strips (Ora Flow) inserted 1 mm into the sulcus for 30 seconds; contaminated strips were discarded. PISF volume was measured in microliters using a Periotron 8000 device, and samples were stored at -80°C until analysis. Treatment protocols included: mechanical debridement with titanium curettes for Group 1; decontamination using a 940 nm diode laser (2.5 W, CP2 mode, 400 μm fiber tip) for 30 seconds for Group 2; and a sequential combination of both treatments for Group 3. Following treatment, all pockets were irrigated with 10% povidone-iodine. Clinical parameters and PISF samples were evaluated at baseline (T0), week 4 (T1), and week 12 (T2). For biochemical analysis, S100A8 levels were determined via ELISA at 450 nm and calculated as ng/mL using a standard curve.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 28 days (Week 4), and 84 days (Week 12)
S100A8 levels will be measured using an ELISA kit (ng/mL) to evaluate the inflammatory response.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 28 days (Week 4), and 84 days (Week 12)
Distance from the gingival margin to the bottom of the sulcus/pocket measured at six sites per implant/tooth.
Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 28 days (Week 4), and 84 days (Week 12)
Distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the bottom of the pocket.Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 28 days (Week 4), and 84 days (Week 12)
Assessment of plaque accumulation on the implant/tooth surfaces. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0 to 3)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 28 days (Week 4), and 84 days (Week 12)
Assessment of gingival inflammation and bleeding tendency. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0 to 3)
Kırıkkale University
Other
Effect of 940 nm Diode Laser as an Adjunct to Mechanical Debridement on S100A8 Levels and Clinical Parameters in Peri-Implantitis Treatment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06695559
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implantitis
Thessaloniki, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT07529444
Dental Implant Complications, Dental Implant Failure
Zagreb, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT05897736
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implant Health
View Trial DetailsNCT06800625
Periimplant Diseases, Toothbrushing
Niğde, Niğde Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details