Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07331857

Digma System First in Human (FIH) Study

Prospective, open-label, single-arm, early feasibility study (EFS) in 2 Patient cohorts: Cohort A - Dose finding / Dose response study in patients with various etiologies undergoing Esophagectomy and Cohort B - Patients with Barrett's Esophagus (BE) with Low-Grade Dysplasia (LDG) or High-Grade Dysplasia (HGD) without a visible (excisable) lesion. This is a pilot study which plan to enroll up to 5 eligible patients in the First Cohort (A) and up to 15 patients in the Second Cohort (B) of the study.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Gastroenterologické a hepatologické oddělení

Brno, 60200, Czechia

Location contact

Jan Martínek

CONTACT

[email protected]

+420 543 182 420

Jan Martínek, prof,MD,PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lucie Jelínková

CONTACT

[email protected]

+420 735 190 319

Martin Vašátko, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Michaela Jurčišinová, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Study intervention means tha application of different doses of laser energy in the ablation of esophageal mucosa using the Digma System and the Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Ablation Device (EGAD) procedure (Cohort A) followed by application of the optimal dose for treatment of patients with BE with Low-Grade Dysplasia (LGD) or High-Grade Dysplasia (HDG) without a visible lesion (Cohort B).

EGAD is a proprietary, controlled laser ablation system for the treatment of endoluminal pathologies of the gastrointestinal tract. EGAD achieves high precision through a unique optical design that controls laser energy, beam size, wavelength, and focal plane. This allows for effective ablation that is limited to the mucosa of pre-selected regions of interest, avoiding a wider and deeper injury to healthy tissue. EGAD procedure can be performed safely in a standard endoscopy suite under direct endoscopic visualization. In this First-in-Human pilot feasibility study, we plan to assess the feasibility of EGAD for achieving mucosal ablation (1) in healthy esophageal tissue in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer or other indications (Barrett's mucosa may be ablated as well) - Cohort A; and (2) In patients with Barrett's Esophagus with low and/or high-grade dysplasia (BORN = Barrett´s Oesophagus-Related Neoplasia) without a visible (excisable) lesion - Cohort B.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Cohort A:

  • Male or Female ≥18 years of age at the time of consent.
  • Scheduled to undergo esophagectomy for malignant or benign indications .
  • Contain enough healthy (or with BE) tissue to be ablated (≥1cm) by for EGAD treatment.
  • Capable of providing written informed consent.

Cohort B:

  • Male or Female ≥18 and ≤ 70 years of age at the time of consent.
  • Documented diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus (BE) with LGD or HGD, confirmed by biopsy specimen analysis.
  • No visible lesion in the esophagus (suitable for endoscopic resection).
  • Scheduled to undergo Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) procedure of Barrett's Esophagus (BE) with dysplasia.
  • BE affected tissue length ≥1 cm and ≤ 5cm (as measured endoscopically).
  • Capable of providing written informed consent.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with follow-up requirements, including endoscopies and biopsies.
  • Ability to tolerate and take oral proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication.

Exclusion criteria

Cohort A:

  • Severe medical comorbidities that preclude esophagectomy.
  • Any medical or technical condition that may preclude endoscopy during surgical esophagectomy at the discretion of operating surgeon.
  • Any previous procedures involving esophageal tissue resection or ablation.
  • Patients with incomplete healing of tissue following radiation at the area-of-interest.
  • Subjects undergoing (or having undergone) photodynamic therapy.
  • Subjects of high surgical risk, in which any delay in the esophagectomy surgery may, in the option of the PI, increase the risk for to Adverse event (AE) / Serious Adverse event (SAE).
  • Presence of esophageal stricture preventing passage of the endoscope or investigational catheter .
  • Any anatomical abnormality (such as but not limited to, esophageal dilation) that, at the discretion of the investigator may preclude the laser ablation.
  • Presence of esophageal varices in the esophagus.
  • Presence of severe bleeding or severe inflammation at the time of endoscopy of EGAD.
  • Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of childbearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method .
  • Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardize participant's safety or compliance with the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP).
  • Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.

Cohort B:

  • Severe medical comorbidities that preclude endoscopy or multiple co-morbidities placing the patient at risk or otherwise unsuitable for trial participation .
  • Previous radiotherapy in the chest.
  • Previous Endoscopic Mucosal resection (EMR) / Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in the esophagus.
  • Subjects currently undergoing or subject that had previous ablative therapy within the esophagus (e.g., Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), Multipolar Electrocoagulation (MPEC), Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC), laser treatment, radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
  • Presence of esophageal stricture preventing passage of the endoscope or investigational catheter .
  • Active esophagitis.
  • Esophageal or gastric varices.
  • Subject diagnosed with portal hypertension.
  • Subject diagnosed with Liver cirrhosis.
  • Presence of severe bleeding or severe inflammation in the area-of-interest.
  • Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents that cannot be discontinued 5 days prior to the procedure
  • Active systemic infection or malignancy.
  • History of esophagectomy
  • History of locally advanced (>T1a) esophageal cancer treated endoscopically/by chemoradiotherapy.
  • Subjects with known coagulation conditions (e.g. uncontrolled coagulopathy)
  • Concurrent chemotherapy.
  • Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of childbearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method.
  • Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardize participant's safety or compliance with the CIP .
  • Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent.
  • Known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions, uncontrolled psychiatric illness (including recent inpatient psychiatric treatment, psychosis, moderate to severe depression, illicit substance abuse) or any psychiatric diagnosis which in the opinion of the investor would preclude participation in the study.
  • Concurrent enrollment in an investigational drug or device trial that clinically interferes with study endpoints.
  • Subject that is unwilling or unable to comply with study visits and other study procedures as required per protocol.

Treatment and study plan

Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Ablation Device (EGAD)

Device

Application of different doses of laser energy in the ablation of esophageal mucosa using the Digma System and the EGAD procedure (Cohort A) followed by application of the optimal dose for treatment of patients with BE with LGD or HDG without a visible lesion (Cohort B).

Primary outcomes

  1. Cohort A: Incidence of severe immediate adverse events (AEs)

    Time frame: Day 1, ESOPHAGECTOMY surgery

    Cohort A: Incidence of severe immediate adverse events (AEs) that are directly associated with EGAD procedure (esophageal perforation, bleeding, patient hemodynamic or respiratory decompensation during the procedure or death following the procedure).

  2. Cohort B: Incidence of immediate severe AE

    Time frame: Day 1

    Cohort B: Incidence of immediate severe AE (including esophageal perforation, bleeding, patient hemodynamic or respiratory decompensation during the procedure or death following the procedure, esophageal stricture rate after ablation).

  3. Cohort B: Incidence of late severe AE

    Time frame: 10-12 months follow-up, following each visit and procedure

    Cohort B: Incidence of late severe AE (including esophageal perforation, bleeding, patient hemodynamic or respiratory decompensation during the procedure or death following the procedure, esophageal stricture rate after ablation). A dedicated designed Questioner will be used.

  4. Cohort A: Dose response effects of ablation on mucosal tissue

    Time frame: Day 1, ESOPHAGECTOMY surgery

    Cohort A: Dose response effects of ablation on mucosal tissue (assessed by histopathological assessment of mucosal eradication (coagulation necrosis).

  5. Cohort B: Eradication of dysplasia level and of visible segment of BE

    Time frame: 10-12 months follow-up, at each follow-up visit

    Cohort B: Eradication of dysplasia level and of visible segment of BE assessed macroscopically.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events related to the procedure (Cohort A+B)

    Time frame: Day 1

    Incidence of any adverse events related to the procedure.

  2. Maximal ablation depth (cohort A)

    Time frame: Day 1, ESOPHAGECTOMY surgery

    Evaluation of maximum ablation depth. Grading of histology to be conducted in accordance with accepted histological score grading such as depicted in van Munster SM et al. Endoscopy 2021,53,1162-1168 wherein thermal injury was semi-quantitatively scored and the proportion of tissue injury was calculated (depth of thermal changes / total tissue thickness).

  3. Maximal ablation volume (cohort A)

    Time frame: Day 1, ESOPHAGECTOMY surgery

    Evaluation of maximum ablation volume. Following esophagectomy, all resected ablated tissue will be submitted for histopathologic analysis. Analysis of the EGAD treatment ablation sites for evaluation of the ablation outcomes (such as extent of mucosal ablation and depth of penetration) will be conducted per a predefined histological protocol and criterium.

  4. Dose response effect of treatment(s) on depth-of-penetration. (cohort A)

    Time frame: Day 1, ESOPHAGECTOMY surgery

    Evaluation of the dose-dependent effect of treatment on penetration depth, examining how different intensities or doses of the therapy used affect the extent to which the treatment penetrates the tissue, in order to assess the relationship between dose, efficacy, and the potential risks of excessive treatment. Grading of histology to be conducted in accordance with accepted histological score grading such as depicted in van Munster SM et al. Endoscopy 2021,53,1162-1168 wherein thermal injury was semi-quantitatively scored and the proportion of tissue injury was calculated (depth of thermal changes / total tissue thickness).

  5. Assessment of collateral impact as assessed by histopathologic evaluation.

    Time frame: 10-12 months follow-up or when eradication of BE is achieved

    Assessment of secondary effects, in which histopathological examination is used to assess the extent of undesirable changes in tissues outside the target area in order to determine whether the procedure has caused damage to surrounding structures or other unforeseen tissue reactions.

  6. Rate of complete eradication of dysplasia (cohort B)

    Time frame: 10-12 months follow-up

    The degree of complete eradication of dysplasia, which assesses the extent to which all dysplastic changes in the mucosa have been completely removed or replaced by normal epithelium after treatment, in order to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the therapy and minimize the risk of persistent or recurrent precancerous lesions.

  7. Rate of eradication of intestinal metaplasia. (cohort B)

    Time frame: 10-12 months follow-up

    The degree of eradication of intestinal metaplasia, which monitors how much of the pathologically altered mucosa has been successfully removed or replaced by normal epithelium after treatment in order to assess the effectiveness of therapy and the likelihood of long-term remission.

  8. Eradication of macroscopically visible segment of BE.

    Time frame: 10-12 months follow-up

    Eradication of macroscopically visible Barrett's esophagus, in which complete removal of all clearly altered mucosal areas is assessed to ensure that the pathological epithelium has been treated in its entirety and that no residual focal changes remain.

  9. Assessments of lesion ablation - safe margin area.

    Time frame: 10-12 months follow-up

    Evaluation of lesion ablation, focusing primarily on the size and consistency of the safety margin to ensure that the treated area sufficiently exceeds the boundaries of the lesion and minimizes the risk of incomplete removal.

  10. Assessment of technical aspects of the procedure-time

    Time frame: Day 1

    Evaluation of the technical time of the procedure (minutes or hours), assessing in particular the time required.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Shlomit Chappel-Ram, BSc,PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+972544644518

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Digma Medical Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

First-in-Human Pilot Study for the Evaluation of Digma Medical's Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Ablation Device (EGAD) in the Esophagus

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 12, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 12, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.