Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland
Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Keith Petrie
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Taylorson, Masters in Health Psychology
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06972121
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to test whether a brief digital mindset training program can improve performance among recreational runners training for a half marathon in New Zealand in 2025. The study will recruit healthy adult participants who are registered for an upcoming half-marathon event.
The study aims to answer two main questions:
1. Does the mindset training program - designed to reframe common physical symptoms like fatigue or muscle soreness as signs of progress - help more runners complete the race and improve their official times, compared to standard training advice? 2. Does it support better training (e.g., longer peak training weeks) and faster physical recovery after the race?
Researchers will compare participants who receive the mindset training program to those who receive widely followed half-marathon training content and a group who receive no study content, to see whether the mindset training leads to better half-marathon performance and training outcomes.
Participants will:
* Complete a brief online survey at the start of the study * Receive and engage with four pieces of digital content across nine weeks before the half-marathon race (if assigned to a training group) * Complete a follow-up survey after the half-marathon
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
Location status: Recruiting
Keith Petrie
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Taylorson, Masters in Health Psychology
CONTACT
This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether a brief digital mindset intervention can improve performance and training outcomes among recreational runners training for a half marathon. The intervention is grounded in psychological theories of mindsets, expectation, placebo effects, and effort perception, which suggest that how individuals interpret physical symptoms during exercise-such as fatigue or muscle soreness-can influence motivation, persistence, and overall outcomes.
The intervention aims to reframe mild physical symptoms experienced during training as signs of physiological adaptation rather than negative signals, helping participants develop more adaptive mindsets about effort and endurance. Intervention content includes brief digital modules that introduce the concept of meta-mindsets (beliefs about how mindsets influence experiences and outcomes) and provide applied strategies for interpreting discomfort as a normal and constructive part of the endurance training process.
The digital modules are delivered over a nine-week period leading up to the participant's half marathon and are designed to be time-efficient and accessible. To ensure comparability, participants assigned to the active control group receive parallel-format digital modules that focus on widely followed training advice, without any mindset-related material. Participants in the control group do not receive digital content during the study period. All intervention content is delivered via the Intervengine platform or email.
Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three study arms. Randomization is conducted independently using a computer-generated allocation sequence. The study follows an intention-to-treat analysis approach, with additional per-protocol analyses among participants who complete the intervention and race.
Statistical analyses will include ANOVA and mixed-model approaches to assess group differences in primary and secondary outcomes over time. Missing data will be addressed using multiple imputation techniques. All eligibility criteria, outcome measures, and intervention details are specified in the relevant sections of the clinical trial registration record.
This trial contributes to a growing body of research examining scalable psychological interventions that support physical activity adherence and performance. It explores whether brief mindset-focused training can enhance endurance outcomes in real-world, non-clinical athletic contexts.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The mindset intervention includes 4 brief digital modules over 9 weeks (once every 3 weeks) via app or email, prior to the half-marathon race. The content introduces meta-mindsets (beliefs about how mindsets shape experiences and outcomes) and reframes non-severe physical symptoms (e.g., muscle soreness, fatigue) as signs of physiological adaptation. Modules cover: (1) what mindsets are and how they affect performance; (2) how to interpret normal training symptoms as positive signals; (3) how to maintain adaptive mindsets during peak training; and (4) race-day mindset preparation. Each module includes brief text, visuals, and reflection questions and takes approximately five minutes to complete.
The marathon performance training intervention includes 4 brief digital modules over 9 weeks (once every 3 weeks) via app or email, prior to the half-marathon race. Content is based on publicly available half-marathon training guidance and excludes any mindset-related material. Modules cover: (1) setting race goals and structuring training plans; (2) training tips and best practices (e.g., pacing, injury prevention); (3) navigating peak training periods (e.g., distance increases, rest and recovery); and (4) practical race-day preparation strategies (e.g., pacing, fueling, warm-up routines). Each module includes concise text, visuals, and actionable tips designed to take approximately five minutes to complete.
Time frame: At half-marathon race completion (approximately 9 weeks after intervention start)
The primary study outcome is the official half-marathon finish time recorded for each participant (in hours, minutes, and seconds)
Time frame: At half-marathon race completion (approximately 9 weeks after intervention start)
Number of participants who complete a half marathon, across each study arm.
Time frame: 1-week post-race (self-reported number of days to recover since race day)
Number of days it took participants to feel fully recovered from their half-marathon race. For example, when fatigue and muscle pain subsided.
Time frame: 1-week post-race (reflecting participant-identified peak training week, usually 3-4 weeks before race day)
The number of days each participant ran during their peak training week before the half-marathon race.
Measured with the question:
During your peak training week, how many days did you train? (days/week)
Time frame: 1-week post-race (reflecting participant-identified peak training week, usually 3-4 weeks before race day)
The total distance (in kilometers) that each participant ran across all training runs during their peak training week prior to the half-marathon race.
Measured with the question:
During your peak training week, what was the total distance you ran across all your runs that week? (km)
Time frame: From baseline to 1-week post-race.
The Body Mindset Inventory - Version 2 (BMI-2), adapted for half-marathon runners.
Assessed using 6-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree, 6 = Strongly agree).
Time frame: 1-week post-race (reflecting 9-week intervention period)
Perceived influence of mindset vs. training schedule on race performance
Assessed via two self-report items using 10-point Likert scales (1 = Not at all, 10 = An extreme amount):
"How much do you think your mindset influenced your half marathon training and performance?"
"How much do you think your training schedule influenced your half marathon performance?"
A difference score will be calculated by subtracting the response to item 2 (training schedule) from item 1 (mindset). This score reflects the participant's relative attribution of their performance to mindset vs. training. Positive scores indicate greater perceived influence of mindset; negative scores indicate greater influence of the training schedule.
Time frame: From baseline to 1-week post-race
The extent to which participants interpret common sensations during challenging runs (e.g., fatigue, muscle discomfort, heavy breathing) as indicators that their body is getting stronger. Responses are collected using a 10-point visual analogue scale ranging from 1 ("not at all signs of getting stronger") to 10 ("definitely signs of getting stronger").
Time frame: From baseline to 1-week post-race
Participants' belief in their ability to influence their mindset, even in high-stakes situations, measured using one item from the Controllable Meta-Mindset Scale: "Even in moments when it really matters, I can't do much to change my mindset." Responses are rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree, 6 = Strongly agree).
Time frame: At baseline
Participants' beliefs about the role of expectations in their upcoming half-marathon performance. Measured using a single item:
"To what extent do you think your expectations will affect your half-marathon performance?", using a 6-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all, 6 = An extreme amount)
Time frame: 1-week post-race
How likely study participants are to participate in another half marathon or endurance race. Measured with 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all likely, 5 = Extremely likely).
Time frame: 1-week post-race
How satisfied people are with their race day performance. Measured with 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all satisfied, 5 = Very satisfied).
Time frame: Within 15 minutes after half-marathon race completion
Change in half-marathon race time, calculated as the difference (in minutes:seconds) between each participant's self-reported previous personal best and their official finish time in their 2025 half-marathon (for those with a prior half-marathon result).
Time frame: 1-week post-race
Did participants perform better or worse than their goal time for the half marathon. Measured via a single-item question administered post-race: "Was this time better or worse than your goal time?" Participants select one of four response options: Better; About the same; Worse; I did not have a goal time
Time frame: Up to 16 weeks post-enrollment (assessed 1-week post-race)
Whether participants experienced any running-related injuries, measured with a single yes/no response question. Since enrolling in this study, did you experience any running-related injuries - before, during, or after your half-marathon race? (Yes (please specify) / No)
Time frame: 1-week post-race (covering up to 15 weeks of training)
Participants' self-reported adherence to their intended training plan in the weeks leading up to the race. Assessed via a single-item question using a 5-point Likert scale:
"How often did you follow your planned training sessions in the weeks leading up to the race?" (1 = Rarely followed my plan, 5 = Followed my plan consistently)
Time frame: At baseline
Participants are invited to provide an optional open-text response to the prompt: "What thoughts come to mind when you think about your upcoming half marathon right now?" This will be used to explore participants' anticipatory beliefs and expectations before training and intervention delivery.
Time frame: 1-week post-race
Participants are invited to complete two optional follow-up prompts:
These responses will be used to qualitatively explore participant perceptions of their training journey and race experience.
Time frame: 1-week post-race (reflecting 9-week intervention period)
Acceptability of the intervention content. Measured with four summed items on a 5-point Likert scale (Scale: 1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree).
The digital content was clear and easy to understand. The digital content helped me perform better during my half marathon. The digital content motivated me to stay consistent with my training. The digital content helped me reframe discomfort during training and my half marathon in a helpful way.
Time frame: At baseline
Participants' prior experience with half-marathon events. Measured using a single self-report item: "How would you describe your half-marathon experience level?" Participants select from two predefined options: (1) Beginner (training for your first half marathon) (2) Intermediate (previously completed up to 2 half marathons).
Time frame: At baseline
Self-reported fastest half-marathon finish time to date. Participants enter their best recorded time in hours and minutes.
Time frame: At baseline
How often participants currently run each week. Measured with a single self-report item: "How many days per week do you currently run for exercise?" Options: None; 1 day; 2-3 days; 4-5 days; 6-7 days.
Time frame: At baseline
Participants' typical running distance per session. Measured using a self-report item: "What is the average distance of your current runs (in kilometers)?"
Time frame: At baseline
Whether participants are following a structured training plan for their upcoming race. Measured with a Yes/No self-report question: "Do you have a training plan for your Half Marathon?"
Time frame: At baseline
Participants' target finish time for the upcoming half marathon. Measured via a self-report item: "Do you have a goal time for the half marathon?" If yes, participants specify their goal time in hours and minutes.
Time frame: At baseline
How long participants typically take to recover from a long training run. Measured with a single self-report item: "How many days do you typically take to recover from a long run?" Options: 1 day; 2 days; 3 or more days; N/A (I haven't started running yet).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Michelle Taylorson, Health Psychology Masters Stud
CONTACT
Rachael Yielder, Health Psychology PhD Candidat
CONTACT
University of Auckland, New Zealand
Other
The Efficacy of a Digital Mindset Intervention to Improve Race Performance, Training Outcomes, and Recovery in Recreational Half Marathon Runners: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06870669
Behavior, Exercise
Manisa, Yunusemre, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05359744
Behavior, Exercise
Salzburg, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT07247513
Behavior, Dietary Intervention
Oeiras, Lisbon District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT06972862
Behavior, Exercise
Lawrence, Kansas, United States
View Trial Details