Digital Art Therapy for Young Cancer Survivors

The ARTCan application has been designed to define therapy strategies for the care of patients; it emerges from a unique collaboration in the disciplines of design, art, art therapy, and medicine from the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning (DAAP) at the University of Cincinnati (UC) and the School of Medicine, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. The relevance of the application design was to enable the trans-disciplinary team to experiment with proof of the following concepts: 1) technology-based tools and feasibility studies for new lines of research in treatment; 2) research that embraces intellectual diversity by merging the creative disciplines; and 3) addressing issues of health and well-being of patients. This study is testing whether the digital art therapy application "Art Therapy Can Do" (ARTCan) is a feasible means of administering art therapy to young cancer survivors. The study is funded by the Ian's Friends Foundation and the Weatherspoon Foundation.

Inclusion criteria

In order to participate in this study a subject must meet all of the eligibility criteria outlined below.

• Written informed assent and parental consent obtained to participate in the study and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information.
• Subject is willing and able to comply with study procedures based on the judgment of the investigator.
• Age 18-25 years at the time of consent.
• Childhood cancer survivor, defined as having cancer between birth 17 years of age and who has completed cancer treatment.
• Reliable internet connection and access to a computer, smartphone, or iPad to support application and virtual study visits.
• Answers "yes" to the question "Do you experience mood issues (yes or no)?".

Exclusion criteria

• All subjects meeting any of the exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation.
• Patients who lack interest in art. Screening question: Are you open to making art on a scale from 1-5 (1 being not at all, and 5 being very much; must score 3 or higher).
• Subjects who lack basic technology skills (Screening question: On a scale of 1-5 (1 being uncomfortable, and 5 being very comfortable), how would you rate your comfort using websites. Must score 3 or higher).
• Subjects unable to provide consent.
• Other conditions or factors which in the opinion of the Pl would not make the patient a good candidate for the study.