Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01124045

Difluprednate Pediatric Study for the Treatment of Inflammation Post-Cataract Surgery

The primary objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of Durezol™ compared to Pred Forte™ for the treatment of inflammation following cataract surgery in a pediatric population 0 to 3 years of age.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

Up to 3 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Contact Alcon Call Center For Trial Locations

Fort Worth, Texas, 76134, United States

About this study

Parents or guardians instilled patients' assigned study medications once on the day of surgery (Day 0) and 4 times daily (QID) beginning on the day after surgery (Day 1) for 14 days followed by a tapering period of 14 days (dependent upon the Investigator's determination of adequate response to treatment). Patients were evaluated for safety and efficacy on the following visits: Day 0 (day of surgery), Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days and Day 29 ± 2 days (end of study drug treatment). Additional safety visits occurred at 1 week after the last dose + 2 days and at 3 Months + 1 week. No inferential statistical analysis was planned for this study. Data was summarized using descriptive statistics.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 0 to 3 years of age.
  • Undergoing uncomplicated cataract extraction in 1 eye with or without intraocular lens.
  • Informed consent signed by a parent or legal guardian.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of any active or suspected viral, bacterial, or fungal disease in the study eye.
  • Use of any topical medication in the study within 7 days prior to surgery, except for drops that are needed to examine the eye or to prepare for surgery.
  • Patients with posttraumatic cataract.
  • Active uveitis in the study eye.
  • Ocular neoplasm in the study eye.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
  • Suspected permanent low vision or blindness in the fellow nonstudy eye. The study eye must not be the patient's only good eye.
  • Patients on systemic steroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
  • History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) rise.
  • Currently on medication for ocular hypertension or glaucoma in the study eye.
  • Diabetes.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion, 0.05%

Drug

Topical ocular administration

Other names: DUREZOL™

Prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension, 1.0%

Drug

Topical ocular administration

Other names: PRED FORTE™

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With an Anterior Cell Grade of 0 (no Cells) at Day 15 ± 2 Days

    Time frame: Day 15 ± 2 days

    Anterior cell grade was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 5-point scale: Grade 0=0 cells; Grade 1=1 to 10 cells; Grade 2=11 to 20 cells; Grade 3=21 to 50 cells; Grade 4=>50 cells. The presence of blood cells (red and white) in the anterior chamber of the eye (the fluid-filled space inside the eye between the iris and the cornea's innermost surface) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Assessment Score of Postoperative Inflammation by Visit

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    A Global Assessment Score (GAS) was assigned by the Investigator based on the clinical evidence of postoperative inflammation: 0=clear, 1=improving satisfactorily; 2=not improving or worsening, withdrawal from study indicated to allow appropriate alternative therapy to be instituted. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  2. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Anterior Chamber Cell Grade

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Anterior chamber cell grade was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 5-point scale: Grade 0=0 cells; Grade 1=1 to 10 cells; Grade 2=11 to 20 cells; Grade 3=21 to 50 cells; Grade 4=>50 cells. The presence of blood cells (red and white) in the anterior chamber of the eye (the fluid-filled space inside the eye between the iris and the cornea's innermost surface) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  3. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Anterior Chamber Flare Grade

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Anterior chamber flare was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. The presence of flare (increased protein levels) in the anterior chamber of the eye (the fluid-filled space inside the eye between the iris and the cornea's innermost surface) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  4. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Corneal Clarity

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Corneal clarity was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Lack of corneal clarity (1-3) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  5. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Conjunctival Injection

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Conjunctival injection was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Conjunctival injection (redness of the white sclera of the eye) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  6. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Ciliary/Limbal Injection

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Ciliary/limbal injection was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Ciliary/limbal injection (redness of the white sclera of the eye near the limbal ring) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  7. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Chemosis

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Chemosis was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Chemosis (swelling of the conjunctiva) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  8. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Hypopyon

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Hypopyon was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Hypopyon (pus in the anterior chamber of the eye) is a sign of ocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  9. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Vitritis

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Vitritis was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Vitritis (accumulation of inflammatory cells or exudates in the vitreous humor, the fluid that fills the middle chamber of the eye) is a sign of ocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  10. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Wound Integrity

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Wound integrity was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Lack of wound integrity (healing, 1-3) is a sign of inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  11. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Photophobia

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Photophobia was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Photophobia (abnormal intolerance to visual perception of light) is a symptom of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

  12. Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Lacrimation

    Time frame: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week

    Lacrimation was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Excessive lacrimation (tear production and secretion, 1-3) is a symptom of ocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alcon Research

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase IIIB, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group, Active-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Difluprednate Ophthalmic Emulsion, 0.05% (Durezol™) 4 Times Daily (QID) and Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension, 1.0% (Pred Forte™) QID for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery in Children 0 to 3 Years of Age

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
May 14, 2010
Registry last updated
Jun 19, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.