flow cytometry
OtherCorrelative studies
NCT Number: NCT01165996
RATIONALE: Decitabine may help myelodysplastic cells become more like normal stem cells. PURPOSE: This clinical trial studies differentiation therapy with decitabine in treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Case Medical Center, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Demonstrate that differentiation therapy with DNMT1 depleting but non-DNA damaging doses of decitabine is efficacious and can be administered weekly for > = 12 months. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Assess safety of the regimen.
II. Retrospectively compare study and standard regimen clinical responses. III. Assess the ability of a pharmacodynamic assay that measures DNMT1 depletion in peripheral blood white blood cells to predict clinical responses to decitabine.
IV. Assess PCR for aberrant methylation signature as an early marker of relapse. V. Identify biologic features of MDS that correlate with response to decitabine, thereby facilitating future patient selection.
VI. In cases of relapse or resistance, assess the role of the enzyme CDA in altering decitabine metabolism and preventing DNMT1 depletion.
OUTLINE:
INDUCTION PHASE: Patients receive decitabine subcutaneously (SC) twice weekly for 4 weeks or thrice weekly until achieving bone marrow blasts < 5%.
MAINTENANCE PHASE: Patients then receive decitabine SC twice weekly for up to 52 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion
Exclusion
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Given subcutaneously
Other names: 5-aza-dCyd, 5AZA, DAC, Dacogen, deoxyazacytidine, dezocitidine
Correlative studies
Other names: gene expression profiling
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Other names: pharmacological studies
Correlative studies
Time frame: Formal assessment at week 12 for study primary end-point (hematologic improvement).
Complete Response (CR) include less than 5% marrow blasts without evidence of dysplasia and normalization of peripheral blood counts, including a hemoglobin level of 110 g/L or more, a neutrophil count of 1.5 × 109/L or more, and a platelet count of 100 × 109/L or more. For PR, patients must demonstrate all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except that marrow blasts should decrease by 50% or more compared with pretreatment levels, or patients may demonstrate a less-advanced MDS disease category than prior to treatment. Stable disease (SD) is defined by failure to achieve at least a partial response but no evidence of progression. Disease progression (DP) includes at least 50% decrease from maximum remission in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in hemoglobin by greater than or equal to 2g/dL, or transfusion dependence. Hematologic improvement (HI) includes hemoglobin increase by at least 1.5g/dL, reduction in transfusions, increase of platelets, increase of neutrophil count
Time frame: up to 12 months of treatment
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) will be presented in tables that include causality, seriousness, severity/grade, and whether the AE resulted in death or discontinuation of treatment, Laboratory data will be summarized in tables that show changes from pre-treatment values and frequencies of abnormal values. Descriptive statistics will also be provided.
Time frame: at 12 months
Described as the number of patients with a major cytogenetic response (refers to disappearance of a cytogenetic abnormality) or a minor cytogenetic response (50% or more reduction of abnormal metaphases).
Time frame: 6 weeks after treatment
Evidence of pharmacodynamic effect will be correlated with clinical response criteria. The pharmacodynamic effect of treatment is defined as the number of participants that had depletion DNMT1 with minimal DNA damage and cytotoxicity.
Time frame: 6 weeks after treatment
Cytotoxicity is the ability to destroy cells. This will be measured by taking bone marrow samples and measuring the damage to cells. The level of cell destruction will be correlated with clinical response criteria.
Time frame: 6 weeks after treatment
Number of participants who, after therapy, had more of the differentiated types of blood (red cells, platelets, and white cells) compared to abnormal bone marrow cells than before therapy
Time frame: Baseline
Proportion of patients with particular genetic abnormalities, including DNA Methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) depletion, detected by whole exome sequencing correlation with clinical response
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
A Proof of Concept Study of Non-DNA Damaging DNMT1 Depletion Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00462605
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Adult Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia (M7)
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00005845
Anemia, Anemia, Refractory
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02566304
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01789255
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details