Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06738134

Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD) for People Living with HIV (PLHIV) and Comorbidities

This is an implementation study evaluating differentiated service delivery model for the care of comorbidities for people living with HIV (PLWH). The Hybrid Type 3 study design is adopted, with the primary goal of evaluating implementation outcomes, and secondary goals of evaluating service and client outcomes according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, including Proctor's Conceptual Framework for Implementation Outcomes, using mixed methods for data collection and analyses. PLWH will be identified from the Integrated Treatment Centre, an HIV clinic in Hong Kong, which provides care to around 3500 PLWH, with services including out-patient care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, antiviral therapy for HIV and hepatitis co-infection, and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. PLWH with comorbidities will be asked to participate in a survey for willingness to participate. Those interested will be co-managed at the HIV Comorbidities Clinic at the Prince of Wales Hospital, where the DSD model of care is conducted. Evaluation of implementation outcomes will be performed at the end of the programme.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Prince of Wales Hospital

Shatin, Hong Kong

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Catherine Cheung

CONTACT

[email protected]

85235053376

Grace LUI, MBChB

CONTACT

About this study

PLWH who are receiving effective and durable anti-retroviral therapy (ART) have similar life expectancy as the general population, but the patients do suffer from two-fold higher burden of disability associated with chronic comorbidities as compared with people without HIV infection. The screening and management of these chronic comorbidities are gaining attention in both high-income and low- and middle-income settings.

There are at present different models of care to deliver healthcare for the screening and management of comorbidities for PLWH. Fully integrated care of both HIV and comorbidities in a one-stop clinic brings numerous benefits, including optimal utilization of resources, provision of holistic care, and de-stigmatization; but also encounters various challenges, such as placing burden on human and spatial resources in HIV clinics, and the limited availability of co-medications in HIV clinics. In high-income settings, traditional models of care are often physician-centred, thus more innovative models have been explored, involving integrated care in the primary care setting, or consultations by multiple specialists in an integrated clinic, but these require a high magnitude of coordination and have resource implications, limiting feasibility universally. On the other hand, a "differentiated service delivery (DSD)" model is an adaptive model of care that aims to tailor healthcare delivery services according to patients' individual clinical needs and preferences, while taking into consideration resource availability in the local context. This model of care is successful in the delivery of HIV care and management of ART, and is patient-centred, offering patients a mode of care most optimal for their lifestyle and needs without imposing unmanageable burden on the healthcare system. DSD is advocated to be developed for the aging population of PLWH to provide patient-centred healthcare service for management of their comorbidities and other age-related issues, but has not been well studied.

The rising use of telemedicine since the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the management of HIV and other chronic diseases would facilitate the incorporation of more patient-centred options in healthcare service delivery according to patients' needs and preferences. Telemedicine interventions improve access to care, control of disease, and quality of life in people with chronic non-communicable diseases. In particular, telemonitoring interventions and synchronous video teleconsultations are found to be beneficial in disease control and enhancing patient-physician interaction.

The currently proposed DSD model of care has the following benefits: (1) patient-centred care with individualized care delivery options according to patients' preference, such as offering teleconsultation as an alternative, options of different drug delivery modes, and personalized management plans according to individual clinical needs; (2) shared care between HIV care providers and internal medicine specialists, with close communication regarding clinical data and treatment plans, while avoiding duplication of resources; (3) draws on the availability of telemedicine tools in public healthcare services in Hong Kong; (4) patient empowerment by educating patients on treatment goals, performing selfmonitoring of disease, and scheduling appointments according to clinical indications; and (5) optimizing care of complex comorbidities by providing specialist care, and screening and management of comorbidities according to evidencebased guidelines.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • PLWH eligible to participate in this study are PLWH aged 18 years or above
  • followed up at the HIV Clinic, and with one or more cardiometabolic comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, cardiovascular diseases, and cerebrovascular diseases. They will be eligible if HIV physicians consider them having sub-optimal control of their comorbidities, suspected of having complications, or would benefit from screening of complications resulting from their comorbidities. These indications are selected as they involve specialist care, including investigations and treatment, which are not available at the HIV Clinic.

Exclusion criteria

  • Incompetent subjects who cannot give informed written consent.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of PLWH

    Time frame: Baseline

    Acceptability of PLWH, as defined by the proportion of PLWH who perform the survey who indicate "willingness to participate" in the DSD programme.

  2. Participation willingness

    Time frame: Baseline

    Similarities and differences between PLWH who are willing and not willing to participate in the DSD programme, by comparing their demographic and clinical data, and the factors assessed in the survey that are associated with perceived benefits and barriers to participation in this programme

Secondary outcomes

  1. Impact on clinical outcomes

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Number of new diagnoses made and changes in ART regimen per 100 patient-year follow-up during participation of the Programme, compared with the same parameters in the 12 months preceding the participation in this Programme.

  2. Unscheduled clinic visits

    Time frame: 12 months preceding the participation in this Programme

    Safety is measured by the number of unscheduled clinic visits at general out-patient clinics, ad hoc HIV clinic telephone enquiry and consultations, Accidents and Emergency Department attendance, and hospital admission per 100 patient-year follow-up during participation of the Programme, compared with the same parameters in the 12 months preceding the participation in this Programme

  3. Satisfaction with the Programme among PLWH

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Satisfaction is defined by the level of satisfaction with the Programme among PLWH. This is measured by a survey to be administered at the end of 12 months follow-up, to determine level of satisfaction with each of the components of the Programme and overall satisfaction.

  4. Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure during study.

  5. Changes in body weight

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in body weight during the study.

  6. Changes in body mass index

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in body mass index during the study

  7. Changes in fasting glucose

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in fasting glucose during the study

  8. Changes in HbA1C

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in HbA1c during the study

  9. Changes in lipid profiles

    Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in lipid profiles such as total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride during the study

  10. Changes in creatinine

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in creatinine during the study

  11. Changes in alanine transaminase

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Changes in alanine transaminase during the study

  12. Self-reported adherence to non-ART medications

    Time frame: Through the study completion, an average of 1 year

    Adherence to prescribed non-ART medications is measured by self-reported adherence to prescribed non-ART medications in the preceding 7 days of the consultations.

  13. Change in health-related quality of life (HrQoL) measured by SF12

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Change in health-related quality of life (HrQoL) measured by SF12 during the study

  14. Change in health-related quality of life (HrQoL) measured by WHOQOLHIV BREF

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    Change in health-related quality of life (HrQoL) is measured by WHOQOLHIV BREF during the study

  15. Preception by healthcare workers at HIV clinic

    Time frame: This survey will be performed at baseline and after all patients completed all follow-ups.

    Perception of this programme as a whole, and its key components, as agreeable or not. Healthcare workers at the HIV clinic will be asked to complete a survey for assessment of their perception of the programme and intention to refer eligible patients to the Programme. This survey will be performed after the Briefing session at HIV clinic, and after completion of all participant recruitment.

    Factors which healthcare workers anticipate or have encountered that are facilitators and barriers to refer eligible patients to the Programme will be evaluated from the survey.

  16. Feasibilty 1- Rate of recruitment

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Recruitment rate is defined as the proportion of PLWH attending the first consultation at the Comorbidities Clinic among all PLWH who have participated in the Acceptability Survey.

  17. Feasibilty 2- Retention rate of the Programme

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Retention rate of the Programme is defined as the proportion of PLWH completed 12-month follow up among those agreed to join the Programme.

  18. Fidelity 1

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Fidelity is defined as the extent to which the Programme is conducted as planned in our original protocol, including adherence to the protocol and quality of programme delivery. Adherence to each core component of the Programme is assessed, and is defined as the proportion of PLWH completing all complication screening procedures

  19. Fidelity 2

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Fidelity is defined as the extent to which the Programme is conducted as planned in our original protocol, including adherence to the protocol and quality of programme delivery. Adherence to each core component of the Programme is assessed, and is defined as the proportion of scheduled teleconsultations attended by PLWH

  20. Fidelity 3

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Fidelity is defined as the extent to which the Programme is conducted as planned in our original protocol, including adherence to the protocol and quality of programme delivery. Adherence to each core component of the Programme is assessed, and is defined as the proportion of teleconsultations with prior submission of report from eHealth Management module

  21. Fidelity 4

    Time frame: At 12 months

    Fidelity is defined as the extent to which the Programme is conducted as planned in our original protocol, including adherence to the protocol and quality of programme delivery. Adherence to each core component of the Programme is assessed, and is defined as the proportion of PLWH who have co-medications delivered according to opted mode of delivery

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Grace LUI

CONTACT

[email protected]

35051716

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Implementation of Differentiated Service Delivery Model of Care for People Living with HIV with Comorbidities

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 17, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 17, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.