National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06867653
Previous studies on compression-only CPR and AED training for the general public have primarily focused on the optimal retraining interval. However, the impact of different retraining durations remains unclear. This study explores how varying practice durations in Basic Life Support (BLS) training affect BLS performance among non-professionals.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Location status: Recruiting
In this study, participants first underwent compression-only CPR and AED training. Before training, they completed a questionnaire on their perspectives on BLS retraining and basic demographic information. Knowledge tests, skill assessments, and attitude and confidence questionnaires were conducted both before and after training. During the skill assessment, two cameras recorded the process from different angles: one positioned from the feet towards the head of the manikin and the other from the left chest towards the right chest. Instructors, blinded to group allocation, later reviewed the recordings and assessed participants' performance using an evaluation form. Additionally, chest compressions were recorded using a computerized manikin (SkillReporter Resusci Anne®, Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway).
Participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups based on different retraining durations:
All three groups underwent skill assessments and knowledge tests every three months before their respective retraining sessions. The retraining skill assessments followed the same procedure as the initial training. Each retraining session began with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice. Each participant practiced for approximately five minutes per cycle, which included two minutes of chest compressions, one minute of AED application, one minute of feedback, and one minute for role-switching. Based on this structure, participants in the 45-minute group completed two practice cycles, those in the 60-minute group completed three cycles, and those in the 75-minute group completed four cycles.
Both the initial training and retraining followed the American Heart Association (AHA) Heartsaver® CPR+AED course guidelines, with a participant-to-manikin ratio of 3:1 and a maximum of six participants per instructor. One year after the initial training, before the final skill assessment, participants completed the knowledge test and the attitude and confidence questionnaire. After the final skill assessment, they completed the CPR retraining perspectives questionnaire.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Each retraining session begins with a 15-minute comprehensive review, followed by hands-on practice
Time frame: one year after the initial training
The average compression rate during the skill assessment and the proportion of participants in each group with an average compression rate between 100-120 compressions per minute one year after the initial training
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the initial training
The average compression depth and the proportion of participants in each group with an average compression depth between 5-6 cm during the skill assessment every three months
Time frame: 3 month, 6 months and 9 months after initial training
The average compression rate and the proportion of participants in each group with an average compression rate between 100-120 compressions per minute at 3 month, 6 months and 9 months after initial training.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the initial training
The proportion of complete chest recoil in each group every three months
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the initial training
The percentage of compression time over total assessment time in each group during the skill assessment
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the initial training
The proportion of correct hand placement in each group during the skill assessment every three months
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the initial training
The proportion of participants passing the assessment evaluated by instructors
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the initial training
The passing rate for each item on the evaluation form
Time frame: one year after the initial training
The attitude questionnaire consists of two questions, each rated using a Likert scale, including 'strongly disagree,' 'disagree,' 'neutral,' 'agree,' and 'strongly agree.' When calculating the scores, 'strongly disagree' is assigned 1 point, 'disagree' 2 points, 'neutral' 3 points, 'agree' 4 points, and 'strongly agree' 5 points. A higher score indicates that participants place greater importance on the item.
Time frame: one year after the initial training
The confidence questionnaire consists of three questions, each rated using a Likert scale, including 'strongly disagree,' 'disagree,' 'neutral,' 'agree,' and 'strongly agree.' When calculating the scores, 'strongly disagree' is assigned 1 point, 'disagree' 2 points, 'neutral' 3 points, 'agree' 4 points, and 'strongly agree' 5 points. A higher score indicates greater confidence.
Time frame: one year after the initial training
The perspective questionnaire on retraining consists of two questions: (1) How long do you think the interval for CPR retraining should be? (2) How long do you think the duration of a CPR retraining course should be? These two questions are open-ended.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Other
Different Re-training Durations in Basic Life Support Training Among Non-Professionals: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07511712
Clinical Competence, Education Curriculum
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02561780
Adolescents, Behavior
View Trial Details