Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06843668

Different Dosing Strategies of Colistin in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections

Nosocomial infections caused by multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens represent a major threat worldwide. The increasing trend of multi-drug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) poses a particularly acute challenge to health systems especially in critically ill patients.

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) have encountered an increasing emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. In Saudi Arabia mainly MDR-GNB such as Acinetobacter Baumannii, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Klebsiella Pnemoniae and Enterobacter are observed in ICUs.

Polymyxins are the last line therapy in the treatment of infection caused by these MDR-GNB. Colistin is the most widely used polymyxin antibiotic, it is administered as inactive prodrug colistimethate sodium (CMS) that is hydrolyzed to an active moiety of colistin base activity (CBA). It acts as cationic detergent and damages bacterial cytoplasmic membrane causing leaking of intracellular substances and then cell death.

During the first years of their use, polymyxin-associated neurotoxicity occurred in patients with an incidence as high as 27% following parenteral administration. However, other retrospective clinical trials have not exposed neurotoxicity to be a major concern. On the other hand, nephrotoxicity is by far the most common and dose-limiting side effect associated with parenteral polymyxins, with incidence rates in patients as high as 60%. Despite the high incidence of colistin induced nephrotoxicity, in 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) reclassified polymyxins as critically important for the management of MDR-GNB infection, renewing the interest in these antibiotics.

To the best of our knowledge no study compared the efficacy and safety of both dosing strategies in critically ill patients. Moreover, there is still a lack of evidence on the efficacy and safety of both dosing strategies in obese patients. Therefore, this study aims at comparing the efficacy and toxicity of both strategies in colistin dosing (the fixed dose and the weight-based dosing) in obese patients and non- obese patients.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

King Fahad Specialist Hospital

Buraidah, Saudi Arabia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Ayman A Alharbi, phd

CONTACT

[email protected]

00966540865609

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients age ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients who will be treated with CMS for MR GNB infections.
  • Patients who are admitted to the ICUs.

Exclusion criteria

  • Known hypersensitivity to colistin.
  • Pregnant and lactating women.
  • Patients who are treated with colistin for < 24 hours.
  • Patients with myasthenia gravis or concomitant anesthetics or neuromuscular blocking drugs.

Treatment and study plan

EMA colistin dosing strategy

Drug

The EMA colistin group will receive I.V colistin based on creatinine clearance (mL/min) level , with fixed loading dose 9 MIU equivalent to 300 mg of colistin-based activity (CBA). The maintenance dose will be administered after 12 h following the loading dose over 1 h every 12h (twice daily).

US FDA colistin dosing strategy

Drug

The weight-based colistin group will receive I.V. colistin based on the lower (ideal body weight or actual body weight) with a loading dose of (4) X (patient weight in kg). Loading dose might exceed 300 mg.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical and microbiological success in eradication of infection reported as the number and percentage of patients with successful clinical improvement and microbiological clearance (Efficacy).

    Time frame: 14 days post colistin initiation.

    having a white blood cell count (WBC) of less than 12,000 cells/mm3 or a ≥ 25% reduction in WBC, being afebrile for ≥ 48 h,.

    • Microbiological clearance will be defined as eradication of the original causative organism from subsequent blood cultures by day 14 of therapy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nephrotoxicity (Safety)

    Time frame: 14 days

    nephrotoxicity was defined as doubling of baseline serum creatinine level or drop-in baseline creatinine clearance rate by ≥50%.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Abdulmajeed S Alharbi, Master

CONTACT

[email protected]

00966503984099

Mona M El-Tamalawy, Master

CONTACT

[email protected]

01220650700

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Safety of Different Dosing Strategies of Colistin in Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infections in Critically Ill Patients

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 25, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 4, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.