NCT Number: NCT02501590
Differences in Muscle Activity Patterns and Graphical Product Quality in Children With Graphomotor Impairment
Drawing on a vertical surface, rather than horizontal (such as blackboard) is often used by occupational therapists as a way of developing fine motor control and visual motor integration in children. In healthy children no difference in graphical quality was shown between drawing on vertical or horizontal surfaces. However, this was not investigated in children with graphomotor impairments.
The goal of this study is to determine whether movements produced on a vertical surface differ in their performance level and muscle activation patterns compared to movements produced on a horizontal surface. The investigators predict that there would be a difference in the level of performance between the two surfaces.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
4 year–6 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
Primary location
Loewenstein Rehabilitation Center, Raanana, Israel
About this study
Drawing on a vertical surface, such as a blackboard (rather than a horizontal surface) is often used by occupational therapists as a way of developing fine motor control and visual motor integration in children. While there is anecdotal evidence to support this intervention, preliminary results in healthy children showed no differences in graphical quality while drawing on vertical or horizontal surfaces. This however was not investigated in children with graphomotor impairments.
The goal of this study is to determine whether movements produced on a vertical surface differ in their performance level and muscle activation patterns compared to movements produced on a horizontal surface.
The investigators predict that the level of performance on the vertical surface will exceed the level of performance on the horizontal surface. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that the proximal muscles will be more activated and fatigued (in longer tasks) while drawing on the vertical surface, while the distal muscle will be more activated and fatigued while drawing on the horizontal surface.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Study group Inclusion criteria:
- Up to 50 percentile in the long form Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (Beery VMI).
Exclusion criteria
- children in special education,
- any orthopedic or neurologic impairment,
- visual impairment that could not be corrected with glasses, or
- ability to understand and follow simple instructions, reported by the parents.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Normilized Muscle Activity
Time frame: day1
The maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) value for each muscle will be computed as the average of three peaks of the surface electromyography (sEMG) data, which differed by no more than 10% from one another. The mean root mean square (RMS) values of the sEMG data will be normalized by the MVC value for each muscle so that the value is presented by percentage.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Loewenstein Hospital
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Differences in Muscle Activity Patterns and Graphical Product Quality in Children With Graphomotor Impairment Copying and Tracing Activities on Horizontal or Vertical Surfaces
Important dates
- Study start
- 2015
- Primary completion
- 2016
- Study completion
- 2016
- First posted
- Jul 17, 2015
- Registry last updated
- Apr 30, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.