Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07630519

Diferences in 3D Gait Analysis After Various Types of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Patients with hip osteoarthritis who were indicated for total hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled and randomized to receive either a short (metaphyseal) stem or a conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem hip arthroplasty. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed regularly (preoperatively and at multiple postoperative time points) to determine whether conservative implants result in superior objective and patient-reported outcomes

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

45 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Masaryk Hospital

Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem Region, 40113, Czechia

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • high-grade hip osteoarthritis

Exclusion criteria

  • none

Treatment and study plan

Conservative Total Hip Arthroplasty

Procedure

Conservative (metaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty

Procedure

Conventional (metadiaphyseal) stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Primary outcomes

  1. 3D Gait analysis - Gait Profile Score

    Time frame: from preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    The Gait Profile Score (GPS) is a numerical index (range 0-10, the lesser the number, the better for the patient). The GPS comprises of the kinematic parameteres that are also called the Gait Variable Scores (hip flexion, rotation and abduction) and the spatiotemporal parameters (step time, step length and step cadence). All of these parameters are also mentioned ad separate outcome measures. The extraction of GPS from the 2 basic data groups was done automaticaly through specialised software which is based on the work of Baker et al. (Baker R, McGinley JL, Schwartz MH, et al. The gait profile score and movement analysis profile. Gait Posture. 2009;30(3):265-269. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.020).

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Modified Harris Hip Score

    Time frame: from preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    Total range of the questionnaire is 0-100 points, more points=better patient reported outcome. 90-100 points = excellent result; 80-89 = good result; 70-79 = fair result; < 70 points = poor result.

Other outcomes

  1. Step Time

    Time frame: from preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    One of the measured spatiotemporal parameters assessing the duration of a step measured in seconds. The parameter does not have a physiological normative scale.

  2. Hip flexion

    Time frame: from preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    One of the kinematic gait parameters = Gait Variable Scores measured in degrees. Physiological range of hip flexion is 0 to 130 degrees, the higher the range, the better for the patient.

  3. Step length

    Time frame: From preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    One of the measured spatiotemporal parameters assessing the length of each step measured in meters. The parameter does not have a physiological normative scale.

  4. Step cadence

    Time frame: from preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    One of the measured spatiotemporal parameters assessing the number of steps in a minute. The parameter does not have a physiological normative scale.

  5. Hip external rotation

    Time frame: from preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    One of the kinematic gait parameters = Gait Variable Scores measured in degrees. Physiological range of hip eternal rotation is 0 to 60 degrees. The higher the range, the better for the patient.

  6. Hip abduction

    Time frame: From preoperative to 1 year postoperative

    One of the kinematic gait parameters = Gait Variable Scores measured in degrees. Physiological range of hip abduction is 0 to 45 degress. The higher the range, the better for the patient.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Masarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative 3D Gait Analysis: Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Stem Anchoring (Metadiaphyseal vs Metaphyseal)

Acronym: 3DGAHIP

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.