Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01826591

DIETFITS Study (Diet Intervention Examining the Factors Interacting With Treatment Success

Genomics research is advancing rapidly, and links between genes and obesity continue to be discovered and better defined. A growing number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in multiple genes have been shown to alter an individual's response to dietary macronutrient composition. Based on prior genetic studies evaluating the body's physiological responses to dietary carbohydrates or fats, the investigators identified multi-locus genotype patterns with SNPs from three genes (FABP2, PPARG, and ADRB2): a low carbohydrate-responsive genotype (LCG) and a low fat-responsive genotype (LFG). In a preliminary, retrospective study (using the A TO Z weight loss study data), the investigators observed a 3-fold difference in 12-month weight loss for initially overweight women who were determined to have been appropriately matched vs. mismatched to a low carbohydrate (Low Carb) or low fat (Low Fat) diet based on their multi-locus genotype pattern. The primary objective of this study is to confirm and expand on the preliminary results and determine if weight loss success can be increased if the dietary approach (Low Carb vs. Low Fat) is appropriately matched to an individual' s genetic predisposition (Low Carb Genotype vs. Low Fat Genotype) toward those diets.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Stanford University School of Medicine

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

About this study

If the intriguing preliminary retrospective results are confirmed in this full scale study, the results will demonstrate that inexpensive DNA testing could help dieters predict whether they will have greater weight loss success on a Low Carb or a Low Fat diet. Commensurate with increasing scientific interest in personalized medicine approaches to intervention development, this would provide an example of the potentially substantial health impacts that could be obtained through understanding specific gene-environment interactions that have been anticipated from the unraveling of the human genome.

Mobile App Sub-Study-For the purpose of augmenting adherence to high vegetable consumption in both diet groups, we will develop a theory-based mobile app to increase vegetable consumption through goal-setting, self-monitoring, and social comparison. Participants from both diet groups with iPhones will be re-randomized to receive the app at either months 4-5 or months 7-8. The first phase during months 4-7 will be used to compare the effect of a mobile app (intervention) vs. no mobile app (waiting-list control). The a priori hypothesis is that vegetable consumption will increase among those who receive the app in both diet arms. The investigator and outcomes assessor will be blinded to group assignment. Intention-to-treat analysis will be used.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: > 18 years of age
  • Women: Pre-menopausal (self-report) and <50 years of age
  • Men: <50 years of age
  • BMI (body mass index): 27-40 kg/m2 (need to lose >10% body weight to achieve healthy BMI)
  • Body weight stable for the last two months, and not actively on a weight loss plan
  • No plans to move from the area over the next two years
  • Available and able to participate in the evaluations and intervention for the study period
  • Willing to accept random assignment
  • To enhance study generalizability, people on medications not noted below as specific exclusions can
  • participate if they have been stable on such medications for at least three months
  • Ability and willingness to give written informed
  • No known active psychiatric illness

Exclusion criteria

Subjects with the following conditions will be excluded (determined by self-report):

  • Pregnant, lactating, within 6 months post-partum, or planning to become pregnant in the next 2 years
  • Diabetes (type 1 and 2) or history of gestational diabetes or on hypoglycemic medications for any other indication
  • Prevalent diseases: Malabsorption, renal or liver disease, active neoplasms, recent myocardial infarction (<6 months)(patient self-report and, if available, review of labs from primary care provider)
  • Smokers (because of effect on weight and lipids)
  • History of serious arrhythmias, or cerebrovascular disease
  • Uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism (TSH not within normal limits)
  • Medications: Lipid lowering, antihypertensive medications, and those known to affect weight/energy expenditure
  • Excessive alcohol intake (self-reported, >3 drinks/day)
  • Musculoskeletal disorders precluding regular physical activity
  • Unable to follow either of the two study diets for reasons of food allergies or other (e.g., vegan)
  • Currently under psychiatric care, or taking psychiatric medications
  • Inability to communicate effectively with study personnel

Treatment and study plan

Low-Carbohydrate Diet

Behavioral

Counseling/instruction on how to follow a low-carbohydrate diet.

Low-Fat Diet

Behavioral

Counseling/instruction on how to follow a low-fat diet.

Mobile App

Behavioral

Mobile app to increase vegetable consumption. Participants with iPhones will be re-randomized to receive a mobile app beginning at either months 4-5 or months 7-8. The first phase during months 4-7 will be used to compare the effect of a mobile app (intervention) vs. no mobile app (waiting-list control). The a priori hypothesis is that vegetable consumption will increase among those who receive the app in both diet groups.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in weight at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Weight change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value. The study was designed to determine if either insulin secretion or genotype pattern (low-fat genotype pattern vs .low-carb genotype pattern) were significant effect modifiers of 12-month weight loss for the two diet arms (e.g., 2X2 analyses).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in LDL cholesterol at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    LDL-cholesterol change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  2. Change from baseline in HDL cholesterol at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    HDL-cholesterol change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  3. Change from baseline in triglycerides at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Triglycerides change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  4. Change from baseline in fasting insulin at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Fasting insulin change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  5. Change from baseline in fasting glucose at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Fasting glucose change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  6. Change from baseline in insulin after an oral-glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Post-OGTT insulin change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  7. Change from baseline in glucose after an oral-glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 12 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Post-OGTT glucose change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  8. Change from baseline in body fat percentage at 12 months.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    Body fat percentage was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  9. Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) at 12 months.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    BMI change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

  10. Change from baseline in resting energy expenditure (REE) at 12 months.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

    REE was assessed by indirect calorimetry and the change was calculated as the 12 month value minus the baseline value.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Stanford University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  • Nutrition Science Initiative

Registry information

Official study title

Do Insulin Secretion or Genotype Pattern Predict Low Fat vs Low Carb Weight Loss Success?

Acronym: DIETFITS

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 8, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.