Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02646124

Diazepam Use With Standard Management for Acute Low Back Pain

Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an Emergency Department (ED) visit for musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP), we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–69 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

About this study

Low back pain (LBP) causes 2.4% of visits to US emergency departments (ED) resulting in 2.7 million visits annually. In general, outcomes for these patients are poor. One week after ED discharge, 70% of patients report persistent back-pain related functional impairment and 69% report analgesic use within the previous 24 hours. Three months after the ED visit, 48% of these patients report functional impairment, 42% report moderate or severe pain, and 46% report persistent analgesic use.

It is not clear how acute LBP should be treated. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are guideline-supported, first line therapy for acute LBP. NSAIDs are more efficacious than placebo with regard to pain relief, global improvement, and requirement of analgesic medication but are not sufficient therapy for as many as ½ of ED patients, who continue to suffer despite therapy with NSAIDs. Treatment of LBP with multiple concurrent medications is common in the ED--emergency physicians often prescribe benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants, or opioids in combination with NSAIDs. However, work recently completed here at Montefiore has revealed that combining skeletal muscle relaxants or opioids with NSAIDs does not improve outcomes. It remains uncertain if adding benzodiazepines to NSAIDs improves LBP outcomes.

Although benzodiazepines are used in 300,000 US ED visits for LBP annually, scant evidence exists to determine the appropriateness of this approach. Efficacy of benzodiazepines may be related to direct or centrally-mediated action on skeletal muscle or may instead work by mitigating anxiety about the condition or numbing a patient to the pain.

Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an ED visit for musculoskeletal LBP, we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than NSAID monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain. Specifically, we will evaluate the following hypothesis:

A daily regimen of naproxen + diazepam will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen + placebo one week after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Present to ED primary for management of LBP, defined as pain originating between the lower border of the scapulae and the upper gluteal folds. Flank pain, that is pain originating from tissues lateral to the paraspinal muscles, will not be included.
  • Absence of non-musculoskeletal etiology of low back, such as urinary tract infection, cystic ovarian disease, or influenza like illness. The primary clinical diagnosis, at the conclusion of the ED visit, must be a diagnosis consistent with non-traumatic, non-radicular, musculoskeletal LBP.
  • Patient is to be discharged home. Patients admitted to the hospital are more likely to be treated with parenteral medication and therefore are not appropriate for this study.
  • Age 21-69 Enrollment will be limited to adults younger than 70 years because of the increased risk of adverse medication effects in the elderly.
  • Non-radicular pain: pain cannot radiate below the gluteal folds in a radicular pattern. Patients with non-radicular pain extending below the gluteal folds will not be excluded
  • Pain duration <2 weeks (336 hours). Patients with more than two weeks of pain are at increased risk of poor pain and functional outcomes.(2)
  • Prior to the acute attack of LBP, back pain cannot have occurred once per month or more frequently. Patients with more frequent back pain are at increased risk of poor pain and functional outcomes.(2)
  • Non-traumatic LBP: no substantial and direct trauma to the back within the previous month
  • Functionally impairing back pain: A baseline score of > 5 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

  • -Not available for follow-up
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Chronic pain syndrome defined as use of any analgesic medication on a daily or near-daily basis
  • Allergic to or intolerant of investigational medications
  • Contra-indications to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: peptic ulcer disease, history of gastro-intestinal bleeding, congestive heart failure, advanced renal disease, aspirin sensitive asthma
  • Contra-indications to diazepam: glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, cirrhosis, sleep apnea, history of alcoholism or substance abuse

Treatment and study plan

Naproxen

Drug

Naproxen 500mg by mouth two times a day, #20

Placebo

Drug

28 placebo capsules

Other names: Placebo Diazepam

Diazepam

Drug

Diazepam 5mg capsules, 1-2 tabs by mouth two times a day, #28

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Functional Impairment as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    Time frame: Between baseline and one week after emergency department discharge

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a 24 item instrument that evaluates the impact of low back pain on one's daily life. It is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability due to acute, sub-acute or chronic low back pain. Each question can be answered as either a "yes" or "no". The score ranges from 0 to 24 where a higher score reflects greater impairment and, therefore, worsening in the quality of life. The change in RMDQ is obtained by subtracting the RMDQ score at one week after discharge from the baseline score.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Moderate or Severe Pain, as Measured on an Ordinal Scale

    Time frame: 1 week after discharge from emergency department

    Patients with moderate or serve pain. Worst Lower Back Pain (LBP) over the previous 24 hours, using a four point ordinal scale: severe, moderate, mild, or none.

  2. Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 24 Hours

    Time frame: One week after discharge from the emergency department

    Telephone questionnaire is used to assess patients needing any analgesic or low back pain medication within the previous 24 hours.

  3. Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 72 Hours

    Time frame: Assessed three months after emergency department discharge

    Patients needing any analgesic or LBP medication within the previous 72 hours

  4. Participants Satisfied With Treatment

    Time frame: 1 week

    Participants who answered "Yes" when asked the question "Do you want to receive the same combination of medications during a subsequent visit to the ER?"

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Adding Diazepam to Standard Management of Acute, Non-radicular Low Back Pain. An Emergency Department Based Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jan 5, 2016
Registry last updated
Aug 1, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.