Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02990208

Diaphragmatic Breathing During Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Aviophobia

The study investigated the effect of diaphragmatic breathing as an additional coping strategy during Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in patients with aviophobia. The authors assumed that diaphragmatic breathing (DB) would lead to less fear and physiological arousal during the VRET and to an enhanced treatment outcome

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Patients with aviophobia received treatment in Virtual Reality with or without DB. The authors assumed that adding DB to VRET would enhance treatment effects by reducing fear during exposure, thus improving the processing of the feared situation. The authors hypothesized that, as a result, self-efficacy would be increased in comparison to VRET alone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 20 to 65
  • flying experience
  • subjective rating of fear of flying > 60 from 100

Exclusion criteria

  • pregnancy
  • heart disease
  • current involvement in psychotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy

Treatment and study plan

Diaphragmatic breathing

Behavioral

Patients trained in the technique of diaphragmatic breathing were instructed to take a breath by contracting the diaphragm and were trained to maintain their respiration frequency. They were told to inhale through the nose for four seconds and exhale through the mouth for six seconds (six cycles per minute). Patients then had five minutes to practice by following verbal breathing instructions provided over headphones. During VR exposure breathing instructions were provided via headphones. Diaphragmatic is thought to reduce arousal on the physiological level (Hazlett-Stevens & Craske, 2009) but at the same time not to divert attention from the feared situation to the same extent as other coping strategies

virtual reality exposure therapy

Behavioral

Exposure to fear-evoking stimuli is conducted more often in virtual environments using simulators or similar computer-technologies (Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy, VRET). One great advantage of using VR-technologies is that it is possible to create an environment which is highly controllable by its creators. Feared stimuli or scenarios can be varied on individual purposes and presented several times. This facilitates the practice of exposure-based treatments especially for situations or places difficult to access or requiring a considerable amount of time and/or money (e.g. being in war zones or a passenger on a flight), where in vivo exposures have often not been conducted or only in a limited manner (Mühlberger & Pauli, 2011)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in FFS (Fear of Flying Scale) scores

    Time frame: immediately before the exposure session, immediately after the exposure session, immediately before the test session (which took place one week after the exposure session), immediately after the test session, in a follow up (one year later)

    The Fear of Flying Scale (FFS; German version (Mühlberger & Pauli, 2011)) covers 21 flight situations (e.g., planning the trip, boarding a plane, turbulence during the flight) rated on a 5-point Likert scale

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in fear ratings

    Time frame: both during the VR flights (consisting of four 2-min phases each) of the exposure and the test session. Ratings were asked one minute after the beginning of each phase of each flight.

    Patients were asked to rate their current fear on a scale from 0 (no fear) to 100 (extreme fear)

  2. Change in heart rate

    Time frame: during the four 2-min phases of each of the three VR flights of the exposure session and of each of the two VR flights of the test session.

  3. Change in electrodermal activity (skin conductance level)

    Time frame: during the four 2-min phases of each of the three VR flights of the exposure session and of each of the two VR flights of the test session.

  4. Change in self-efficacy scores

    Time frame: immediately before the exposure session, immediately after the exposure session, immediately before the test session (which took place one week after the exposure session), immediately after the test session, in a follow up (one year later)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Regensburg

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Diaphragmatic Breathing During Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Aviophobia: Functional Coping Strategy or Avoidance Behavior? A Pilot Study

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Dec 13, 2016
Registry last updated
Dec 13, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.