Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02463773

Diaphragm Ultrasound Vs Transpulmonary Pressure To Set PEEP in ARDS

This is a proof of concept study where the investigators aim to study the correlation between the use of a simple bedside ultrasound measurement of diaphragmatic muscle excursion with established (but time consuming) measurements made to optimize an important setting on the mechanical ventilator (positive end expiratory pressure or PEEP) in intubated adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the medical ICU.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hennepin County Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

About this study

Ventilator induced lung injury (VILI) generates morbidity and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. The awareness of respiratory mechanics is essential in the prevention of VILI. Currently, plateau pressures are widely used as a guide to assess alveolar pressure and minimize alveolar injury. However, patients with reduced chest wall compliance can have higher plateau pressures that may not reflect true alveolar pressure. The transpulmonary pressure has been cited as the true alveolar driving pressure because it takes into account pleural pressure that reflect chest wall mechanics; however, this requires measurement of esophageal pressure.

The investigators have experienced a disproportionate degree of excursion between the posterior and anterior right hemidiaphragm on bedside ultrasound imaging in patients with ARDS, which may reflect the dependent atelectasis that occurs during low tidal volume ventilation, cardiac weight, weight of injured lung and accumulation of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. The optimal PEEP can be guided by measurement of esophageal pressure (and subsequent calculation of transpulmonary distending pressure) with a balloon catheter placed into the esophagus much like a nasogastric tube for enteral access. The investigators believe that the normalization of the disproportionate degree of excursion between the anterior and posterior diaphragm can also be used to identify optimal PEEP, and may be correlated with changes in transpulmonary pressure (the current gold standard).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults older than 18 years old who develop ARDS, as defined by the Berlin criteria, within 72 hours of ICU admission.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any contraindication for nasogastric tube placement including recent injury or pathologic condition of the esophagus.
  • Major bronchopleural fistula.
  • Solid organ transplant recipient.
  • History or current diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis.
  • Non-conventional mechanical ventilation strategy including high frequency oscillation, airway pressure release ventilation, prone ventilation and extra- corporeal membrane oxygenation.
  • Hemodynamic instability defined as MAP<65 with multiple vasopressors.
  • Declining to sign consent form.

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound

Device

Diaphragmatic excursion ultrasound assessment

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility

    Time frame: one year

    This is a proof of concept study that investigates the degree of dorsal and ventral diaphragmatic excursion with bedside ultrasound during PEEP titration. Optimal PEEP management was guided by an esophageal probe calculating transthoracic pulmonary pressure. Each patient underwent a series of PEEP titrations for which data was recorded on diaphragm excursion (mm) and esophageal pressure (cmH2O). Diaphragm excursion (mm) was measured at the ventral and dorsal side using anatomic m-mode with bedside ultrasound. Esophageal pressure was measured using an esophageal probe which was placed at the bedside.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota

Other

Collaborators

  • Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis

Registry information

Official study title

Diaphragm Excursion By Ultrasound As Compared To Transpulmonary Pressure To Optimize PEEP In ARDS: A Pilot Study

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jun 4, 2015
Registry last updated
May 17, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.