VU University medical center
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081HV, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT03527797
Due to an accident, pneumonia or surgery, patients can have severe shortness of breath or lung damage to such an extent that it compromises vital functions. At such times, mechanical ventilation can be lifesaving. The ventilator temporarily takes over the function of the respiratory muscles to ensure adequate uptake of oxygen and removal of carbon dioxide. Mechanical ventilation can usually be stopped quickly after the initial disease has been treated. Unfortunately, in up to 25-40% of ventilated patients it takes several days to weeks before mechanical ventilation can be discontinued, even after treatment of the initial disease. This phenomenon is termed weaning failure. Weakness of the respiratory muscles, such as the diaphragm, is one of the leading causes of weaning failure.
Like other skeletal muscles, the diaphragm can become weakened if it is used too little. This happens often during mechanical ventilation because of excessive assistance provided by the ventilator or use of sedative medication. Excessive activity of the diaphragm can also lead to damage and weakness, just like in other muscles that have to perform excessive amounts for a prolonged period of time. Additionally, excessive work by the diaphragm might have a direct damaging effect on the lungs, which leads to a vicious cycle. As such, it is very important to find a balance between resting the diaphragm (which may lead to weakness) and placing excessive work on the diaphragm (which can damage the diaphragm and possibly the lungs).
In this study, the investigators want to test whether insufficient activity and excessive activity of the diaphragm during mechanical ventilation can be prevented or reduced. The investigators plan to measure the diaphragm activity in 40 participants on mechanical ventilation. Participants will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group. In the intervention group, ventilator support levels will be adjusted according to the observed diaphragm activity, in an attempt to ensure adequate diaphragm activity. The control group receives usual care. The hypothesis is that adjusting the level of support provided by the ventilator is a feasible method to improve the time that the diaphragm operates within acceptable levels of activity over a 24 hour period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081HV, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Increasing support in case diaphragm activity is too high. Decreasing support in case diaphragm activity is too low.
Time frame: 24 hours
Percentage of time that the diaphragm operates within physiological levels of activity (Transdiaphragmatic pressure per breath between 3-12 cmH2O).
Time frame: 24 hours
Average pressure-time product of the diaphragm calculated as the time-integral of transdiaphragmatic pressure, reported and compared between intervention and control
Time frame: 24 hours
Average work per breath and work per minute, calculated as the volume-pressure integral of esophageal pressure, reported and compared between intervention and control
Time frame: 24 hours
Average transpulmonary pressure, tidal volumes, plateau airway pressures, markers for systemic inflammation and mechanical power reported and compared between intervention and control
Time frame: 24 hours
Average percentage of asynchrony events, calculated as number of asynchronies / total breathing cycles * 100%, reported and compared between intervention and control
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Other
Diaphragm-protective Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
Acronym: DiaPro
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03195127
Chronic Disease, Critical Illness
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06120660
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05716451
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05591950
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
View Trial Details