Novovision ophthalmologic clinic
Murcia, 30009, Spain
NCT Number: NCT05857579
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of microblepharoeexfoliation (MBE), intense pulse light (IPL) and meibomian gland expression (MGX) combination in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
The main question it aims to answer are:
* Does MBE-IPL-MGX treatment improve dry eye symptoms? * Does MBE-IPL-MGX treatment improve dry eye signs?
Participants were assigned to receive either three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy (treatment group) or home-based therapy alone (control group).
The investigators will compare both groups to see if MBE-IPL-MGX treatment is superior to home-based therapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Murcia, 30009, Spain
MBE is a novel in-office treatment that works by exfoliating the eyelid margins to remove the accumulated biofilm debris, epithelial keratinization and capped meibomian glands, resulting in better meibum outflow . Different studies have shown that MBE improves DED symptoms [1,2], demodex blepharitis [1-4] and meibomian gland function [2,3,5] In addition, meta-analyses recommend combining IPL with meibomian gland expression (MGX) compared to IPL or MGX alone [6-8]. However, the investigators have not found any studies evaluating the benefits of MBE combined with IPL and MGX.
Consequently, the purpose of the current study is to evaluate whether MBE combined with IPL and MGX leads to an improvement of symptoms and signs in patients with DED due to MGD.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MBE was performed using the yokefellow instrument (Youke Electronic Corporation, Guangzhou, China), which contains a handpiece with a 1.80 mm diameter medical-grade diamond bur. Patients underwent MBE on the upper and lower lid margin of both eyes at 500 rpm until complete removal of accumulated biofilm debris, epithelial keratinization or capped meibomian glands. MBE was carried out only in the first combined treatment session.
Other names: MBE
IPL treatment was carried out with Thermaeye Plus (MDS Medical Technologies SL, Barcelona, Spain). The procedure began by applying an ultrasound gel (Carmado SL, Alicante, Spain) to the patient's periocular areas and upper eyelids. In the periocular areas, 6 light pulses were applied; 4 light pulses on the skin below the lower eyelid (with handpiece placed horizontally in the first pass and vertically in the second pass) and 2 light pulses on the canthal area (with handpiece placed vertically in first and second pass). The parameters were as follows: (1) Filter: 650 nm; (2) fluence: 9 j/cm2; (3) pulses: 2; (4) duration: 3 ms; (5) Delay: 20 ms; and (6) Cooling: 70%. In the upper eyelids, 4 light pulses were applied; 2 light pulses in the first and second pass, respectively. The parameters were as follows: (1) Filter: 650 nm; (2) Fluence: 5 j/cm2; (3) pulses: 1; (4) duration: 3 ms and (5) Cooling: 70%.
Other names: IPL
Finally, the MGX was performed on both upper and lower eyelids of each eye with a Collins forceps (Medi Instrument Inc, New York, USA).
Other names: MGX
Home-based therapy was based on Therapearl eye mask warming compress (Bausch & Lomb, Madrid, Spain) twice a day and Eyestil synfo eyedrops (Sifi Iberica SL, Madrid, Spain) 4 times a day during the study
Other names: HBT
Time frame: Change from Baseline OSDI at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)
Time frame: Change from Baseline TMH at 2 months.
Time frame: Change from Baseline TMA at 2 months.
Time frame: Change from Baseline NIBUT at 2 months.
Time frame: Change from Baseline LLG at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)
Time frame: Change from Baseline Ciliary Hyperemia at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)
Time frame: Change from Baseline Conjunctival Hyperemia at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)
Time frame: Change from Baseline LAMG at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)
Time frame: Change from Baseline MGS at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Worse) to 45 (Better)
Time frame: Change from Baseline MGD grade at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)
Time frame: Change from Baseline OSS at 2 months.
Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)
University of Seville
Other
Diamond Bur Microblepharoexfoliation Combined With Intense Pulse Light and Meibomian Gland Expression for Evaporative Dry Eye: A Short-term Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06483750
Cataract Senile, Dry Eye Disease
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06058559
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05487547
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05168670
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details