Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Çanakkale, Merkez, 17020, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06611917
This study evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasonographic measurements compared to traditional physical examination tests in predicting difficult airways. With no definitive gold standard for anticipating airway challenges, this research explores the diagnostic capabilities of newer, non-invasive techniques like ultrasonography-which is gaining popularity due to its ease of use and widespread availability-in the field of anesthesia. The study focuses on defining highly sensitive and easy-to-use ultrasonographic markers that could aid anesthesiologists, intensive care specialists, and emergency physicians in effective airway management.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Observational
Çanakkale, Merkez, 17020, Turkey (Türkiye)
Anesthesiologists, intensive care specialists, and emergency physicians frequently encounter the challenge of managing difficult airways, a critical competency as failure to secure the airway can lead to severe consequences, including brain damage or death. Intubation, a complex procedure involving several anatomical maneuvers, has traditionally relied on physical examination indicators such as dental and facial anatomy, Mallampati score, and neck mobility to predict potential difficulties. However, these methods, while useful, often lack the accuracy needed for reliable prediction, leading to a significant percentage of unexpected difficult intubations.
Recent advances in medical imaging propose the use of radiological and ultrasonographic assessments to enhance predictive accuracy. Ultrasonography, in particular, offers a non-invasive, easily accessible method for examining airway structures, which could potentially transform standard practices in airway management. The American Society of Anesthesiologists recognizes the promising role of ultrasound in airway assessment, yet acknowledges the need for more standardized approaches to its implementation.
This research aims to compare the predictive value of physical examination findings with that of ultrasonographic measurements such as the distance from skin to hyoid bone, skin to epiglottis, and tongue volume. By establishing more reliable and sensitive ultrasonographic markers, this study seeks to provide clinicians with better tools for assessing the risk of difficult airways, ultimately contributing to safer anesthesia practices and reducing the incidence of intubation-related complications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: up to one hour
The primary outcome measures the effectiveness of ultrasonography and physical examination in predicting difficult airways in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Occurrence of a difficult airway is the primary outcome. A difficult airway is defined by specific clinical criteria:
More than two intubation attempts, Intubation time exceeding 10 minutes, or Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopy grade of 3 or 4. Data will be collected during the intubation process. Intubation attempts and time will be recorded by the anesthesiologist, while the Cormack-Lehane grading will be assessed based on the view of the glottis during laryngoscopy.
Measurement Process:
Ultrasonographic measurements of the airway will be taken preoperatively using non-invasive ultrasound techniques. Additionally, physical examination tests will be performed preoperatively to assess airway risk. The outcome is categorized as difficult airway (yes/no) based on whether the patient meets any of the defined criteria.
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University
Other
Comparative Diagnostic Values of Physical Examination Tests and Ultrasonographic Measurements in Predicting Difficult Airways
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05902013
Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT06637319
Airway Complication of Anesthesia
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06183515
Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Congenital Abnormalities
Istanbul, Umraniye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06687395
Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Critical Incident
Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details