Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT06153927
The current study evaluated the diagnostic performance for myocardial ischemia of on-site automatic CCTA-derived FFR (CT-FFR) using a commercially available workstation as compared with invasive FFR as a reference. The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR was compared to that of CCTA diameter stenosis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Seoul, South Korea
This is a retrospective, multicenter, comparative, investigator-initiated study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR from routinely acquired CCTA data using the software HeartMedi+ 1.0 (AI Medic, Korea) to detect hemodynamically significant CAD. Patients who underwent CCTA within 90 days before invasive coronary angiography and FFR measurement will be screened in each participating center. After that, invasive coronary angiography, FFR data, and CCTA data will be anonymized and transferred to the independent core laboratories and analyzed in a blind fashion.
The presence of ischemia was defined as FFR ≤0.80. Anatomical obstructive stenosis was defined as diameter stenosis on CCTA ≥50%, and the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and CCTA stenosis for ischemia was compared.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CT-FFR was calculated using HeartMedi+ 1.0 according to the manufacturer's instructions
Time frame: At the time of test
Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR to detect hemodynamically significant CAD evaluated with an invasive FFR
Time frame: At the time of test
Spearman's correlation coefficient of CT-FFR with FFR
Time frame: At the time of test
Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate the agreement between CT-FFR and FFR.
Time frame: At the time of test
Diagnostic performance to predict hemodynamically significant CAD included diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
A comparison of diagnostic performance was performed using McNemar's test or weight generalized score statistic as appropriate.
Time frame: At the time of test
Discriminant ability to predict hemodynamically significant CAD was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).
The AUCs were compared by Delong's test
Seoul National University Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03188705
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07468955
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kütahya, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04058990
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial Details