Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03147326

Diagnostic Imaging of Myeloma Bone Lesions

The purpose of this study is to compare the current standard whole-body x-ray with the advanced imaging techniques FDG-PET-CT, NaF-PET-CT and whole-body MRI in the detection of myeloma bone lesions.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Radiology/Department of Nuclear Medicine

Herlev, 2730, Denmark

About this study

Accurate detection of bone lesions in myeloma patients is essential for treatment planning and patient survival.

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients can be enrolled in this study. All participants will at time of diagnosis undergo three project scans (FDG-PET-CT, NaF-PET-CT, whole-body MRI) as well as whole-body x-ray as part of clinical routine practice.

Experienced specialists in the field of radiology and nuclear medicine interpret the images. Each reader performs the evaluations blinded to other imaging results as well as to the patient's clinical information. The reader assesses whether myeloma indicative bone lesions are present in eight predefined skeletal body regions.

Endpoint is purely diagnostic.

Statistics:

Cochran's Q-test: to compare the proportion of patients with bone disease detected by the four scanning methods.

Two-sided ANOVA: to compare the average number of regions detected with bone disease by the four scanning methods.

Tukey's comparison test: to compare the difference between each pair of means.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (biopsy proven)

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior malignancy
  • Are not able to undergo a MRI scan due to MRI contraindications (e.g. pacemaker)
  • Has any condition that places the subject at an unacceptable risk if he/she undergoes a diagnostic CT scan with iv. contrast (e.g. history of severe allergic reaction to the contrast agent)
  • Severe claustrophobia

Treatment and study plan

FDG-PET-CT

Diagnostic Test

scanning method

NaF-PET-CT

Diagnostic Test

scanning method

Whole-body MRI

Diagnostic Test

scanning method

Primary outcomes

  1. Bone metastases detection rate - a patient-based analysis

    Time frame: The three project scans will be performed once and as baseline scans within a maximum of 30 days from the performance of the whole-body x-ray. Image analyses and statistical tests will be done when all project scans have been performed

    To compare the proportion of patients with bone disease detected by the four scanning techniques

  2. Bone metastases detection rate - a region-based analysis

    Time frame: The three project scans will be performed once and as baseline scans within a maximum of 30 days from the performance of the whole-body x-ray. Image analyses and statistical tests will be done when all project scans have been performed

    To compare the number of affected regions with bone disease detected by the four scanning techniques

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Herlev Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Diagnostic Value of FDG-PET-CT, NaF-PET-CT and Whole-body MRI Compared to Whole-body Xray in the Detection of Bone Lesions in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Acronym: RAMP

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 10, 2017
Registry last updated
May 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.