Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05405673

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Bacterial Gene Markers (M3) for Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia

The investigators aim to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and the novel panel of bacterial gene markers (Fn, m3, Ch and Bc) collectively named as M3, in detecting colorectal advanced neoplasia.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Louis Lau

CONTACT

About this study

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the one of the most common cancers in Hong Kong with more than 5,500 new cases annually. There is prevailing evidence of increasing trend of young onset CRC globally. Early detection and resection of pre-malignant colorectal neoplasia has shown to reduce CRC-related mortality.

Non-invasive stool tests including guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) and faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are the cornerstones of population-based CRC screening programmes. The major limitation of this widely used strategy is its unsatisfactory sensitivities for CRC (79%) and advanced adenomas (AA; 40%). The sensitivity for non-advanced adenomas is even lower than 10%. A large proportion of advanced and non-advanced adenomas will be missed by FIT alone. Therefore, identification of alternative non-invasive test with better sensitivity to detect colorectal neoplasia is warranted.

Multitarget stool DNA test and faecal microbial DNA markers appear to be promising options for CRC screening. Several bacterial gene markers have been identified by metagenome sequencing and reported to be associated with CRC, including Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Clostridium hathewayi (Ch) and Bacteroides clarus (Bc). However, these molecular markers had low accuracy in distinguishing adenomas from normal tissue. Recently, a new Lachnoclostridium gene marker (labelled as 'm3') has been shown to have high diagnostic yield for the detection of colorectal adenomas. In a case-control study of 1012 subjects, a linear increasing trend of m3 level was observed from fecal samples of healthy subjects to those with adenomas and cancers. The overall sensitivity of m3 was significantly higher than FIT in detecting all adenomas (48% vs 9.3%), AA (50.8% vs 16.1%) and non-advanced adenomas (44.2% vs 0%). The diagnostic accuracy of m3 could be further enhanced by combining with a panel of fecal microbial markers composing of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Bacteroides clarus (Bc), Clostridium hathewayi (Ch) for CRC (82.3%) and adenomas (64.2%). We hypothesized that the combination of these 4 bacterial gene markers (known as M3) is more sensitive than FIT in detecting colorectal advanced neoplasia.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • They require elective colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening or polyp surveillance, or investigation of symptoms (e.g. anemia, change of bowel habit, abdominal pain);
  • Aged ≥18 years old;
  • Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications to colonoscopy (e.g. perforation, intestinal obstruction, unstable cardiopulmonary status);
  • Contraindication to polyp resection (e.g. active gastrointestinal bleeding, uninterrupted anticoagulation or dual antiplatelets);
  • Known colorectal cancer or adenoma for staged procedure;
  • Previous colonic resection;
  • Personal history of colorectal cancer;
  • Personal history of polyposis syndrome;
  • Personal history of inflammatory bowel disease;
  • Known pregnancy or lactation;
  • Advanced comorbid conditions (defined as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 4 or above);

Treatment and study plan

Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)

Diagnostic Test

A kind of stool test

Other names: Bacterial gene marker test

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of bacterial gene markers panel (M3)

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with one of more advanced neoplasia detected in the index colonoscopy.

  2. Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with one of more advanced neoplasia detected in the index colonoscopy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of M3 for early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers detected in the index colonoscopy.

  2. Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with early-stage (stage 1) or invasive (stage 2-4) colorectal cancers detected in the index colonoscopy.

  3. Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for advanced adenomas

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with one or more advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.

  4. Sensitivity of M3 for advanced adenomas

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with one or more advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.

  5. Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for all adenomas

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with all advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.

  6. Sensitivity of M3 for all adenomas

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with all advanced adenomas detected in the index colonoscopy.

  7. Sensitivity of FIT/FOBT for sessile serrated lesions (SSL)

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of FIT among those with SSLs detected in the index colonoscopy.

  8. Sensitivity of M3 for sessile serrated lesions (SSL)

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of subjects with true positive results of M3 among those with SSLs detected in the index colonoscopy.

  9. Specificity

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of true negative results of M3/FOBT/FIT among those with no adenoma detected in colonoscopy

  10. Positive predictive value (PPV)

    Time frame: 1 month

    The ratio of subjects truly diagnosed as positive to all those who had positive test results

  11. Negative predictive value (NPV)

    Time frame: 1 month

    The ratio of subjects truly diagnosed as negative to all those who had negative test results

  12. Overall diagnostic accuracy

    Time frame: 1 month

    The proportion of correctly classified subjects among all subjects

  13. Microbiota changes in subjects with adenomas or normal findings after polypectomy

    Time frame: 1 month

    Microbiota change measured by qPCR or metagenomic sequencing

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Connie Seto

CONTACT

[email protected]

6049 0760

Min Dai

CONTACT

[email protected]

6049 0760

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Other

Collaborators

  • Aster CMI Hospital
  • Changi General Hospital
  • Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • Osaka International Cancer Institute
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Phramongkutklao College of Medicine and Hospital
  • Sano hospital
  • St. Mark's Hospital
  • Thingangyun Sanpya General Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Cross-sectional Multi-center Study to Assess the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Panel of Bacterial Gene Markers (M3) for Colorectal Advanced Neoplasia

Acronym: M3-PRO

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jun 6, 2022
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.