metformin
DrugAt least 1000 mg/day or up to a maximal tolerated dose.
NCT Number: NCT03429543
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an empagliflozin dosing regimen and one dose of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who are aged 10 to below 18 years and are currently taking metformin, insulin or both drugs (DINAMO TM) or who are treatment naïve or not on active treatment after metformin withdrawal (DINAMO TM MONO) .
Empagliflozin and linagliptin are both approved for use in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. This study will assess how well empagliflozin and linagliptin work by finding out how these treatments affect blood glucose (sugar) levels compared to placebo (a pill that contains no active drug), in children and adolescents. Empagliflozin and linagliptin are considered investigational products in this study since while they have been approved for use in adults, they have not been approved for children and adolescents due to lack of clinical studies in this specific population.
Patients with type 2 diabetes have higher levels of blood glucose (sugar) than patients who do not have this disease. The high level of sugar in the blood can lead to serious short-term and long-term medical problems. The main goal of treating diabetic patients is to lower blood glucose to a normal level. Lowering and controlling blood glucose help prevent or delay complications of diabetes such as heart disease, kidney, eye and nerve diseases, and the possibility of amputation.
Empagliflozin is a drug that helps to reduce blood glucose (sugar) levels by causing glucose to be excreted in the urines.
Linagliptin works by increasing the production of insulin (a hormone that controls the level of blood glucose) after meals when blood glucose (sugar) levels are too high. This helps to lower blood sugar levels.
The subject will either receive one of the active study drugs or a placebo. This study will be double blind; this means that neither the subject, nor the study doctor will know which treatment the subject will receive.
Which treatment the subject receives is decided by a computer, purely by chance; this is called a "random assignment".
For this study, there will first be a screening visit, followed by a 2-week placebo run-in period (all subjects will take placebo once daily). This run-in period is designed to ensure subjects are able to take the study drugs as described in the study protocol. Thereafter there will be a 26-week treatment phase (week 1-week 26) and a 26-week safety extension period (week 27-week 52). Following this there will be a follow-up visit at week 55.
On Day 1 after the placebo run-in phase, the subject will be randomly assigned to receive one of the 3 treatments: empagliflozin 10 mg, linagliptin 5 mg or placebo in a blinded manner. This treatment will continue up to week 14. Then after week 14, the subject will be assigned to receive one of the following 4 treatments: empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg, linagliptin 5 mg or placebo in a blinded manner. The drugs assigned after week 14 will be the same drugs as on Day 1 but some subjects will receive a higher dose of empagliflozin.
After the completion of the 26-week treatment period, the subject will enter a 26-week safety extension period. The same active treatment that the subject had been assigned to at week 14 visit will be continued. Subjects assigned to placebo on Day 1 will be randomly assigned to receive one of the 3 active treatments: empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg or linagliptin 5 mg in a blinded manner. This safety extension period is primarily designed to provide additional information on how well empagliflozin and linagliptin are tolerated.
Following the treatment phases, there will be a follow-up visit at week 55
Intervention model description:
Eligible subjects with HbA1c of 6.5% to 10.5% at screening will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive empagliflozin 10 mg, linagliptin 5 mg or placebo. HbA1c assessment will be performed at Week 12. All subjects with Week 12 HbA1c < 7% will remain on previously assigned randomized treatment. Subjects taking empagliflozin with Week 12 HbA1c >= 7% will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue on the low dose treatment (empagliflozin 10 mg) or up-titrate to the high dose treatment (empagliflozin 25 mg). Subjects taking linagliptin or placebo with Week 12 HbA1c >= 7% will remain on previously assigned treatment. All subjects will get new medication kits dispensed at Week 14 to maintain the blinding.
At Week 26, all subjects previously assigned to placebo will be re-randomized in a 1:1:1: ratio to receive one of the active treatments: empagliflozin 10 mg, empagliflozin 25 mg or linagliptin 5 mg. All subjects will get new medication kits dispensed at Week 14 to maintain the blinding.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me10 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Sanatorio Allende S.A., Nueva Córdoba, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
At least 1000 mg/day or up to a maximal tolerated dose.
Basal or multiple dose injection.
1 film-coated tablet of either Linagliptin or Empagliflozin matched placebo once daily.
1 film-coated tablet Linagliptin once daily, until end of treatment.
Other names: Trajenta(R)
1 film-coated tablet of Empagliflozin once daily, until end of treatment.
Other names: Jardiance(R)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26 of treatment.
Adjusted means taken from the following three models, as pre-specified in the protocol:
Treatment group 1 (TG1): [Placebo], [Linagliptin 5mg] and [Empagliflozin pooled] Treatment group 2 (TG2): [Placebo] and [Empagliflozin 10mg and 10+25mg] Treatment group 3 (TG3): [Placebo] and [Empagliflozin 10mg]
ANCOVA with continuous covariate (baseline HbA1c) and categorical covariates (treatment & age). Effect of linagliptin and of empagliflozin was compared with placebo at an overall α of 0.05 (2-sided) using the Hochberg method to account for multiple testing.
After having obtained statistically significant results for both hypotheses of the primary family of hypotheses (TG1), the secondary hypotheses were to compare the individual empagliflozin doses versus placebo (TG2 & TG3). ANCOVA utilized a weight of zero for patients who were not in the hypothesis test of interest, a value of 2 for re-randomised patients who were in the hypothesis test of interest and a value of 1 otherwise.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks.
Percentage of patients with treatment failure up to or at Week 26 as a binary endpoint, defined as meeting at least one of the following criteria:
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26 of treatment.
Change in Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%) from baseline to the end of 26 weeks. Adjusted values came from a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approach with mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Analyses included fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the categorical covariate age at randomisation and the continuous, fixed covariates of baseline of the response variable and baseline of the response variable-by-visit interaction. The covariate visit was treated as the repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-patient measurements.
Time frame: Up to 395 days.
Time to treatment failure was analysed by Kaplan-Meier estimates up to the end of the study (Week 52). Patients in the placebo group were censored after 26 weeks unless a prior treatment failure was observed.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26.
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG, Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL)) from baseline to the end of 26 weeks. Adjusted values taken from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed classification effect, baseline FPG as linear covariate and age at randomisation as categorical covariate. The random error was assumed to be normally distributed.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26.
Change in body weight (kg) from baseline to the end of 26 weeks. Adjusted values taken from mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the categorical covariate age at randomisation and the continuous, fixed covariates of baseline of the response variable and baseline of the response variable-by-visit interaction. The covariate visit was treated as repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-patient measurements.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26.
Change in systolic blood pressure (SBP, millimeters of mercury (mmHg)) from baseline to the end of 26 weeks. Adjusted values taken from mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the categorical covariate age at randomisation and the continuous, fixed covariates of baseline of the response variable and baseline of the response variable-by-visit interaction. The covariate visit was treated as repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-patient measurements.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26.
Change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP, millimeters of mercury (mmHg)) from baseline to the end of 26 weeks. Adjusted values taken from mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the fixed categorical effects of treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the categorical covariate age at randomisation and the continuous, fixed covariates of baseline of the response variable and baseline of the response variable-by-visit interaction. The covariate visit was treated as repeated measure with an unstructured covariance structure used to model the within-patient measurements.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26.
Percentage of patients who achieve HbA1c <6.5% at the end of 26 weeks.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 26.
Percentage of patients who achieve HbA1c <7.0% at the end of 26 weeks.
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin Over 26 Weeks, With a Double-blind Active Treatment Safety Extension Period up to 52 Weeks, in Children and Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details