Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06212401

Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketofol for Moderate Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Patients were randomly divided into Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr and it was labeled as "infusion 1". In the Ketofol group, 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) were diluted in 8ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Patients received 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion, labeled as "infusion 2".

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

20 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation

Karachi, Sindh, 74200, Pakistan

About this study

Patients aged 20-60 years of any gender scheduled for elective ERCP were included. All these patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II. While those who were allergic to dexmedetomidine, Ketofol, or related medications, BMI over 36 kg/m2 (morbidly obese), had a history of stroke, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, and congestive cardiac failure were excluded. Furthermore, pregnant, or breastfeeding women or patients who reported chronic use of sedative medications or substance abuse, known contraindications to ERCP, and already enrolled in another clinical trial study were excluded.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups using computer randomization. All patients were taken to the procedure room and venous access was secured on a non-dominant hand by 20G IV cannula, intravenous (I/V) fluid (ringer lactate or normal saline) was started by 8 ml/kg/h, and oxygen support was provided by nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute. Standard monitors were attached for heart rate (HR), noninvasive blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and peripheral oxygen saturation SpO2. Injection midazolam 0.05 mg/kg was also given I/V to every patient in both groups to decrease the anxiety of patients.

Patients received either Dexmedetomidine or Ketofol for sedation. All syringes and infusion sets were covered by silver paper and these infusions were labeled as infusion 1 or 2. In patients who received Dexmedetomidine, a 2ml ampule of 100 ug/ml was diluted in 18 ml of normal saline, making a total volume of 20 ml. Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr and it was labeled as "infusion 1". In the Ketofol group, 2 ml ketamine (50mg/ml) and 10 ml of propofol 1% (10mg/ml) were diluted in 8ml of normal saline. This mixture was 20 ml each, making 5mg/ml of ketamine and propofol. Patients received 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion, labeled as "infusion 2".

During infusion, vitals were recorded at 0,1,3,5, and 10-minute intervals from the start, and the Ramsay Sedation scale score (RSS) was recorded every 1 minute. Both infusions were started as per the randomization of groups. The mean difference in time to achieve adequate sedation and time to good recovery were noted as outcomes in each group. In addition, complications during the procedure and recovery were also noted. Adequate sedation was defined as the time from initiation of infusion to achieve an RSS score of 4. While Modified Aldrete's score (MAS) was used to assess the recovery. Time from discontinuation of the infusion to achieve an MAS score of 9 was labeled as a good recovery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 20-60 years
  • Any gender
  • Scheduled for elective ERCP
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergic to dexmedetomidine, Ketofol, or related medications
  • BMI over 36 kg/m2 (morbidly obese)
  • History of stroke, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, chronic liver disease, hypothyroidism, and congestive cardiac failure

Treatment and study plan

Dexmedetomidine

Drug

Patients received dexmedetomidine as a bolus over 10 minutes in a dose of 1ug/kg followed by an infusion at the rate of 0.5ug/kg/hr

Ketofole

Drug

Patients received ketofol 1mg/kg over 10 minutes followed by 50ug/kg/min of infusion

Primary outcomes

  1. Ramsay sedation score

    Time frame: 0-2 hours

    Clinical Score Patient's Characteristics

    • Awake; agitated or restless or both
    • Awake; cooperative, oriented, and tranquil
    • Awake but responds to commands only
    • Asleep; brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
    • Asleep; sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus
    • Asleep; no response to glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified Aldrete's score

    Time frame: 10-15 minutes

    Modified Aldrete's Score, also known as the Aldrete Score, consists of five criteria, each scored from 0 to 2, with a maximum total score of 10. The criteria are:

    • Activity
    • Respiration
    • Circulation
    • Consciousness
    • Oxygen Saturation
    • A score of 9-10 indicates the patient is ready for discharge from the recovery area.
    • A score of 8 may be acceptable for discharge based on the surgeon's and anesthetist's discretion.
    • Scores below 8 may necessitate further observation and interventions.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketofol For Moderate Sedation In Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.