Sohag university Hospital
Sohag, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Magdy M Amin, professor
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07056244
The goal of This prospective, randomized, double-blind comparative study is to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine 0.125% in caudal epidural block for pediatrics undergoing inguinal hernia surgery, aged 2-6 years.
of Both sex.
Interested in participating?
Request Info2 year–6 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sohag, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Magdy M Amin, professor
CONTACT
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
as adjuvant to bupivacaine in caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia
as adjuvant to bupivacaine in caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia
Time frame: "Pain scores will be assessed at 15-minute intervals during the first two hours postoperatively, then at 4, 6, 8,12 and 24 hour"
FLACC scale (Face, Leg, Activity, Crying, Consolability) total score of 0-10 ,so the duration of analgesia will be defined as the time from caudal injection to the point when FLACC score exceeds 4.
Time frame: "Pain scores will be assessed at 15-minute intervals during the first two hours postoperatively, then at 4, 6, 8,12 and 24 hour"
Postoperative pain will be evaluated using the FLACC scale (Face, Leg, Activity, Crying, Consolability). Pain scores will be assessed at 15-minute intervals during the first two hours postoperatively, then at 4, 6, 8,12 and 24 hour. The duration of analgesia will be defined as the time from caudal injection to the point when FLACC score exceeds 4, at which time rescue analgesia is needed
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Hala M Hashem, assistant professor
CONTACT
Reham R Younis, resident
CONTACT
Sohag University
Other
Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Caudal Epidural Block for Pediatrics Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Comparative Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07334548
Complication,Postoperative, Hernia
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07604259
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07360691
Abdominal Wall Hernia, Hernia
Mandya, Karnataka, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06988293
Hernia, Hernia, Abdominal
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details