Taipei City Hospital
Taipei, 106, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT06711653
This study aims to evaluate the effects of different masking conditions on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) responses. Vertical-axis vibrations (VAVs) of 500-Hz short-tone bursts (STB500) and 750-Hz short-tone bursts (STB750) were used to elicit cVEMP responses. These stimuli were delivered through a Mini-Shaker placed at the vertex (Cz) under three masking conditions: no masking (NOM), speech noise masking (SNM), and random interstimulus-interval tone bursts (rISITB). The study focused on testing protocols that can potentially improve unilateral VEMP testing and explore its clinical applicability.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taipei, 106, Taiwan
Participants and Ethics:
The study recruited 20 healthy adults (10 males and 10 females, aged 20-37 years), all of whom had normal otoscopic findings and no history of hearing issues. Ethical approval was obtained, and all participants provided informed consent.
Bone Conduction Vibrations (BCV):
Bone-conducted vibrations were generated using a SmartEP system and delivered via a Mini-Shaker transducer. Stimuli included 500 Hz and 750 Hz short-tone bursts (STB500 and STB750), calibrated to appropriate levels, with specific rise, plateau, and fall times.
Masking Conditions:
Masking sounds included speech noise (250-1000 Hz, calibrated at 100 dB SPL) and random interstimulus-interval tone bursts (rISITB, 500 Hz, 100 dB SPL).
Testing Procedure:
Vertical-axis BCV was delivered to the vertex (Cz) while participants maintained steady neck muscle tension in specified head positions. Electrodes were placed using a standard montage for cVEMP recording. Each side was tested under three masking conditions (NOM, SNM, rISITB) with a 24-hour interval between tests. Responses were recorded bilaterally and repeated for reproducibility.
Study Focus:
The study investigates the effects of different masking conditions on response characteristics, including latencies, amplitudes, and asymmetry ratios. The aim is to refine VEMP testing protocols, explore its potential for unilateral testing, and evaluate its applicability for specific vestibular organ assessments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
routine Vestibular test
Time frame: up to 24 weeks
This study investigates VEMP response rates under different frequencies (500 Hz, 750 Hz) and masking conditions (no masking, speech noise, random tone bursts) to evaluate the effects of masking on VEMP responses.
Taipei City Hospital
Other Gov
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06666686
Anesthesia Induction, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Tekirdağ, Suleymanpasa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07089485
Cognition Disorders, Ear Diseases
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05741515
Bilateral Vestibular Loss, Bilateral Vestibulopathy
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06271694
Behavior, Ear Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details