Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02522754

Development of an Intranasal Proteosome Influenza Vaccine

A study to compare multiple dosage regimes of a protesomal intranasal vaccine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

About this study

A Proteosome-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (P-TIV) administered intra-nasally was shown to be effective, safe, well tolerated, immunogenic - in both systemic and mucosal compartments - and effective at preventing influenza illness.

In two separate studies using the Human Viral Challenge Model, subjects were selected for susceptibility to A/Panama/2007/1999 (H3N2) virus and then dosed with one of three regimens: (A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (H1N1), A/Panama/2007/1999 (H3N2), B/Victoria/504/2000 or B/Shangdong/7/1997) or placebo via a nasal spray. One or two doses were given, 14 days apart, before subjects were challenged with ~8.5 x 105 EID¬50 of A/Panama/2007/1999 (H3N2) virus. Immune responses to the vaccine antigens were measured, namely serum IgG (via the aemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI)) and nasal wash secretory IgA (sIgA) antibodies (via ELISA). Viral titres in nasal washes and symptoms of influenza illness were assessed after viral challenge and compared.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Young healthy adults as determined by medical history, physical examination, serology (HIV and Hepatitis B and C) and clinical laboratory tests.
  • Female subjects were required to provide of a history of reliable contraceptive practice.
  • Susceptibility to A/Panama/2007/1999 (H3N2) (a serum reciprocal HAI titre ≤10) was confirmed at screening. -

Exclusion criteria

included;

  • asthma,
  • hypersensitivity to mercurials or chicken eggs,
  • anatomic or neurologic abnormality impairing the gag reflex or contributing to aspiration, * chronic nasopharyngeal complaints,
  • abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG),
  • febrile illness or significant symptoms of upper respiratory infection on the day of vaccination or between admission to quarantine and administration of the challenge inoculum.
  • Subjects using medication or other products for rhinitis or nasal congestion,
  • Subject who had received systemic glucocorticoids within 1 month, or cytotoxic or immunosuppressive drugs within 6 months of the study start.
  • Subjects agreed not to smoke during the quarantine phase.

Treatment and study plan

Placebo Protesomal Vaccine

Biological

Intranasal vaccine Protesomal Vaccine

Other names: Placebo

Experimental: Protesomal Vaccine 1 x 30 µg

Biological

Experimental: Protesomal Vaccine 1 x 30 µg

Experimental: Protesomal Vaccine 2 x 30 µg

Biological

Experimental: Protesomal Vaccine 2 x 30 µg

Experimental: Protesomal Vaccine 2 x 15 µg

Biological

Experimental: Protesomal Vaccine 2 x 15 µg

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in Influenza Like Illness in those with laboratory confirmed influenza

    Time frame: Within the duration of infection, approx 10 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hvivo

Industry

Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Registry information

Official study title

Study to Determine if Intranasal Proteosome-Adjuvanted Trivalent Influenza Vaccine is Safe, Immunogenic and Efficacious in the Influenza Human Viral Challenge Model

Important dates

Study start
2002
Primary completion
2004
Study completion
2004
First posted
Aug 13, 2015
Registry last updated
Aug 13, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.