Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02772432

Development of a Resiliency Training Program for Parents of Children With Specific Learning Disabilities

This study has three aims:

Phase I: Through focus group interviews with expert clinicians, leaders of organizations, and parents with children with special needs, this study aims to identify the psychosocial needs of parents of children with learning disabilities, specifically a) the types of concerns that parents find most difficult and stressful b) areas of concern that lack support and resources, and c) areas of need for education and skill training. This study also aims to gather feedback on the Benson-Henry Institute's Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP).

Phase II: Informed by Phase I findings, this study aims to develop and determine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual 8-session Relaxation Response Resiliency (3RP) program for parents of children with Specific Learning Disabilities (SPLD).

Phase II: This study also aims to test the effectiveness of a pilot wait-list control trial, establishing efficacy of a virtual resiliency program.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02141, United States

About this study

According to the 2011/12 National Survey of Children's Health, 14.6 million children in the U.S. have special health care needs (e.g., learning disability, ADD/ADHD, developmental delays, chronic mental or physical health conditions); CSHCN comprise between 14.4%-25.6% of the child population in the United States. Having a child with special health care needs (CSHCN) is associated with an increased risk of problems with emotional and physical health and social well-being. Parents of CSHCN are also at an increased risk for not being employed, financial stress, and poor healthrelated quality of life (HRQoL). There is growing literature on the increased levels of parental stress associated with caring for CSHCN. One study found that chronic stress, as measured by the duration of having a CSHCN, was associated with an increase in clinical aging, determined by telomeres (caps at the end of each strand of DNA that protect chromosomes during aging) sequences. A review article provides a comprehensive overview of the links between high levels of parental stress among parents of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities and child health and well-being. Furthermore, a recent study documented that parents of SSHCN feel socially isolated. Therefore, having a child with special health care needs (CSHCN) is associated with an increased risk of problems with emotional and physical health and social well-being. Parents of CSHCN are also at an increased risk for not being employed, financial stress, and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is growing literature on the increased levels of parental stress associated with caring for CSHCN, and a recent review article provides a comprehensive overview of the links between high levels of parental stress among parents of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities and child health and well-being.

Resiliency is a multidimensional construct that refers to the ability to maintain adaptation and effective functioning when faced with stressors. Resiliency provides a framework for understanding the adjustment to stress as a dynamic process. Allostasis refers to the capacity to maintain stability of physiological systems in the face of adversity. When the exposed to chronic stressors, such as care for a CSHCN, individuals expend a great deal of energy attempting to maintain allostasis; this can lead to the metabolic wear and tear described as allostatic load. Evidence is accumulating that this wear and tear is mediated by changes in basal stress system activity and by effects of these changes on dependent systems. Allostatic load and resilience can therefore be assessed by measuring basal stress system activity (HPA axis and salivary alpha-amylase). Thus, research to reduce these parents' exposure to stress and, moreover, improve parental responses to stress, may improve the well-being of both parents and their children. Yet, a treatment focused on the psychosocial needs of parents of CSHCN has not been developed. Thus, research is warranted to examine and intervene upon parental stress.

Through focus group interviews with expert clinicians, leaders of organizations, and parents with children with special needs, this study aims to identify the psychosocial needs of parents of children with learning disabilities, specifically a) the types of concerns that parents find most difficult and stressful b) areas of concern that lack support and resources, and c) areas of need for education and skill training. This study also aims to gather feedback on the Benson-Henry Institute's Relaxation Response Resiliency Program (3RP) to advance our next objective to develop a resiliency intervention to provide support to parents of children with learning disabilities. This study aims to evaluate the virtual 3RP for Parents of SPLD in a wait-list control trial and determine a) its feasibility and acceptability and b) its effectiveness at decreasing stress and stress reactivity.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

for 3RP intervention:

  • Being the parent of at least one elementary school aged child with a diagnosed specific learning disability
  • Age 18 or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

for participation in 3RP group:

  • Being the parent of a child with a severe mental or physical disability up to the discretion of the principal investigator
  • Unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent documents

Treatment and study plan

Relaxation Response Resiliency Training for Parents of SPLD

Behavioral

Primary outcomes

  1. Distress

    Time frame: change between baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks post intervention

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-Distress is a 1-item scale which asks responders to rate their level of distress on a scale of 0 to 10. A higher score indicates more distress.

  2. Current Experiences Scale

    Time frame: Change between baseline and 12-weeks

    The CES is a 25-item measure of resilience adapted from the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) to reflect current functioning in the domains of appreciation for life (AL), adaptive perspectives (AP), personal strength (PS), spiritual connectedness (SC), relating to others (RO), and an additional four items to assess current adaptive health behaviors (HB) that are not part of the PTGI. The CES is scored on a scale from 0-125 with higher scores indicating greater resilience.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stress Reactivity

    Time frame: change between baseline (week 0) to 12 weeks post intervention

    The Measure of Current Status Part A (MOCS-A) is a 13-item self-report measure developed to assess participants' current self-perceived status on several skills: the ability to relax at will, recognize stress-inducing situations, restructure maladaptive thoughts, be assertive about needs, and choose appropriate coping responses as needed. Scores can range from 0 to 52, and higher scores are correlated with greater self- perceived proficiency with these skills.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Marino Foundation

Registry information

Acronym: SPLD

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
May 13, 2016
Registry last updated
Sep 10, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.