Gaziosmanpasa University
Tokat Province, 60250, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT03436537
Aesthetics for individuals become increasingly important, while the aesthetic effects of periodontal disease is an important issue that should be assessed by the patient's perception.
The results demonstrate that the periodontal aesthetic perception scale showed reliable and valid scores in healthy controls and periodontal patients.
The periodontal aesthetic perception scale may be an appropriate tool to assess periodontal esthetic in clinical and research settings.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Tokat Province, 60250, Turkey (Türkiye)
Aim: The aim of this study is to develop and validate a periodontal aesthetic specific tool to assess aesthetic conditions perceived by patients with periodontal problems.
Methods: With patient interviews were identified a total of 22 statements that describe the non-aesthetic gingival appearance. These 22 items were reviewed by the dentists and then Periodontologists and the number of items in the survey was reduced to 7. Subsequently, three groups of patients were included in the study: Gingival recession (GR) group, gingival enlargement (GE) group and periodontal healthy (H) group. Consequently, the validity and reliability of the periodontal aesthetic perception scale (PAPS) were examined.
Results: According to the results of the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), 1 item was removed from the scale. The final 6-item questionnaire was shown to have a two-domain structure. Cronbach's alpha for the whole scale was .766. The interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) values were between 0.98 and 1.00, demonstrating excellent agreement. Overall, these findings indicated that the PAPS has good reliability.
Conclusion: This reliable, valid and short questionnaire specific to aesthetic conditions perceived by patients with periodontal problems may serve as a valued instrument in future clinical trials.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for gingival recession group:
Inclusion criteria
for gingival enlargement group:
-The presence of gingival enlargement (Grade 0, I, II, III, or IV) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.
Exclusion criteria
for all groups:
Patients answered the self-reported 7-item questionnaire for Periodontal aesthetic perception scale
Time frame: 6 months
The KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) test produced a value of 0.80, which was greater than the recommended threshold value of 0.50.
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07034625
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Enlargement
Antalya, Konyaaltı, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07234994
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Enlargement
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07551310
Gingival Diseases, Gingival Enlargement
Erzurum, Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07517328
Chronic Inflammatory Gingival Enlargement, Gingival Diseases
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details