Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01634451

Development and Evaluation of Strategies to Improve Sedation Quality in InTensive Care

Intensive Care Units (ICUs) across Scotland are working with the Scottish Patient Safety Programme (SPSP) to reduce healthcare associated infections (HAls). This is being done through implementation of "care bundles". Ensuring that ICU patients get the correct amount of sedation (medicine that makes patients sleepy) is part of this bundle, but is proving the most difficult to get right. It's important healthcare staff (nurses and doctors) get sedation levels correct because too much sedation is linked with increased hospital acquired infections (HAIs), longer intensive care (ICU) and hospital stays, and possibly higher death rates. This quality improvement project will develop and introduce three interventions that may improve sedation practice: first, an ICU sedation education package; second, feedback of sedation-related performance data (graphs and charts); and third, introduction of a CE (Conformité Européenne - With the CE marking on a product, the manufacturer ensures that the product conforms with the essential requirements of European regulations) marked new technology designed to improve sedation management. The investigators will study the effect these interventions, in different combinations, have on sedation management and quality in the participating ICUs. Eight ICUs in Scotland will take part in the project, pairs (2 ICUs) will be assigned randomly to different combinations as follows: 1.Enhanced education alone, 2. Education plus process/outcome measure feedback (graphs and charts), 3. Education plus introduction of a new sedation monitoring technology, or 4. Education,process/outcome measure feedback, and sedation monitoring technology. The investigators will evaluate which combinations of education, feedback, and technology provide the most patient benefit in the NHS. In addition both nursing & medical staff will be observed in clinical practice & interviewed about their clinical practice to increase understanding about sedation management from different view points and inform the education package content. These data will also help implement the findings after the research is completed if a benefit is found.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Monklands Hospital, Victoria Infirmary Glasgow, Forth Valley Royal, Ninewells hospital, Dumfries Infirmary , Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy

Edinburgh, Glasgow, Airdrie, Larbert, Dumfries, Dundee, United Kingdom

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients admitted to ICU mechanically ventilated and intubated.
  • All patients in whom mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube is instituted at some time after ICU admission will also be eligible for inclusion from the time intubation and mechanical ventilation begins.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are not receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube
  • Patients who received mechanical ventilation following ICU admission but this has been discontinued at the time of screening for study inclusion
  • Patients in whom discontinuation of mechanical ventilation is anticipated in the next 4 hours
  • Patients in whom a decision to withdraw active therapy has been made
  • Patients who have already been enrolled in the during the same hospital admission
  • Patients whom have been mechanically ventilated and intubated for greater than 24 hrs by the time relatives are approached for consent

Treatment and study plan

Bespoke on-line sedation education package

Other

A bespoke on-line education package has been developed and will be accessible by all ICU nursing staff. They will have unique logins and the system will track their use and completion of the education package. There is a small multiple choice assessment at the end of the package.

Other names: Bespoke Education Package

Sedation specific outcome process feedback

Other

Using statistical process charts, the data gathered from the Sedation quality Tools (SQATs) completed each shift by the ICU nurses, will be fed back highlighting sedation specific outcomes e.g. number of over sedated days per 1000 ventilator days.

Other names: Sedation pecific outcome process feedback

Responsiveness monitoring; novel sedation monitor

Device

Responsiveness monitoring (developed by GE Healthcare) is a novel technology used to monitor patient responsiveness and essentially alert ICU nursing staff when their patients may be over sedated.

Other names: Responsiveness Monitoring

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline the effect of individual and combinations of the interventions named on achievement of optimal sedation practice

    Time frame: Cluster trial examining group effects over a 20 month period. Data available June 2014.

    The % of ventilated patient days with optimal sedation will be compared across and between the groups. A sedation quality assessment tool has been developed for the purpose of the study:

    Group 1 -Education package only (bespoke sedation education) Group 2 -Education package and real time (site specific) process feedback about sedation practices Group 3 - Education and responsiveness (sedation) technology Group 4 - Education package, real time (site specific) process feedback about sedation practices and responsiveness (sedation) technology

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of ventilation days

    Time frame: Cluster trial examining group effects over a 20 month period. Data available June 2014.

  2. ICU stay duration

    Time frame: Cluster trial examining group effects over a 20 month period. Data available June 2014.

  3. Number of days on sedation

    Time frame: Cluster trial examining group effects over a 20 month period. Data available June 2014.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Edinburgh

Other

Collaborators

  • Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government
  • GE Healthcare

Registry information

Acronym: DESIST

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jul 6, 2012
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.