Evaluation Unit. Canary Islands Health Service
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santa Cruz Tenerife, 38109, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04241978
The main goal of this study is assess the effectiveness of a PtDA for patients with hip osteoarthritis
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santa Cruz Tenerife, 38109, Spain
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a health condition sensitive to patient's preferences and values regarding the benefits and risks of the different treatment options. In this sense, patient decision aids (PtDA) can play an important role in helping patients to incorporate their values, needs and preferences into the decision-making process, thus improving Person-Centred Care (PCC). Previous research has focused almost exclusively on knee OA, and therefore the aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a PtDA for patients with hip OA.
Methods: The general design consists of two phases: 1) design a web-based PtDA for patients with hip OA, following the recommended procedures: systematic review of safety/effectiveness of treatments, and an iterative process of development with the help of an Advisory Committee composed of health professionals and patients; 2) To evaluate the impact of the PtDA on hip OA patients' decision-making process related with their treatment. For that aim, a multicenter randomized controlled trial will be carried out with 124 patients with hip OA in Tenerife (Spain) comparing intervention or usual care.
Discussion: PtDAs have been recommended as a useful and effective resource for improving PCC in many health conditions. The intervention is intended to empower patients by fostering their active participation during the decision-making process about their treatment, and by ensuring they make informed decisions congruent with their values and preferences. This study will contribute to the scientific knowledge about effectiveness of PtDAs in hip OA, in order to improve the quality of health care offered to these patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) are tools that enables to promote and facilitate patients' involvement in medical decisions concerning their health
Other names: Intervention
Participants of the control group will be given a brochure with general information about osteoarthritis of the hip, knee, ankle and foot instead of the PtDA
Other names: Control
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
DCS is a 16-item self-reported scale widely used in PtDA research. It is composed of five subscales: uninformed, values, support, uncertainty and effectiveness. This is a 0-100 point scale, where a high score means more decisional conflict.
Time frame: Before and immediately after the intervention
A 7-item scale will be udes to assess patients' knowledge of the disease and treatments
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Patients will be asked to rate in a 0-10 scale the importance they attribute to different characteristics of treatment: mode of administration, improvement in pain and function, risk of mild and serious adverse effects, time until symptoms' improvement, duration of benefits, and in the case of arthroplasty, period of rehabilitation and risk of needing surgery revision.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Patients will be asked the treatment they prefer: physiotherapy, medication, intra-articular injections, arthroplasty, not sure
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Assessed with one item ranging 0 (not sure) to 5 (completely sure)
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Binary variable (yes/no) derived from the association between values and intention to undergo arthroplasty (see statistical analysis).
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Binary variable (yes/no) defined as a combination of adequate knowledge (≥60% of correct responses) and concordance.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
The Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD) is a validated 12-item scale measuring participants' satisfaction with healthcare decision making. The SWD uses a 5-point Likert scale where 0 is "Strongly Disagree" and 4 is "Strongly Agree." This is a 0-100 point scale, where a high score means more satisfaction with the decision making process.
Servicio Canario de Salud
Other
The Effectiveness of a Web-based Decision Aid for Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05164575
Arthritis, Hip Osteoarthritis
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03467165
Arthritis, Hand Osteoarthritis
Bologna, BO, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06744582
Arthritis, Hip Osteoarthritis
Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06783452
Arthritis, Behavior
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details