Oregon State University
Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, United States
NCT Number: NCT05950672
This R21 provides a multidisciplinary One Health approach to developing and evaluating a novel Cat Assisted Training (CAT) animal assisted intervention (AAI) for early adolescents with developmental disabilities (DD) and their family cat. Cat social behavior and welfare is heavily influenced by human behavior and training, making it highly likely that cats would also benefit from this program. There remains a critical need for further empirical evaluation of AAI practices, especially those that target the specific needs of youth with disabilities. Further extending the development and evaluation of activity-based AAIs beyond those that include dogs and horses also helps address the critical need to consider and include diverse human participants, creating new equitable opportunities for AAI involvement to those who may have access to cats, but not dogs and horses (due to practical, health, cultural, socio-economic, or other personal reasons).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me8 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, United States
This R21 provides a multidisciplinary One Health approach to developing and evaluating a novel Cat Assisted Training (CAT) animal assisted intervention (AAI) for early adolescents with developmental disabilities (DD) and their family cat. The novel CAT intervention will be a 6-week cat walking and training program for youth 8 - 17 years old. Participants will learn how to respond appropriately to cat body language, practice fear-free and positive reinforcement-based handling, and training skills, and how to fit a harness and walk their cats on leash. For the human participants, skills and behaviors learned during the intervention are expected to promote and support long-term physical activity, social wellbeing, and lasting feelings of responsibility even after the intervention itself has concluded. We also expect these experiences to improve the relationship between the child participant and household cat, and in turn, reduce cat stress in the child's presence and increase cat sociability and indicators of behavioral wellbeing. Because each child will participate with a cat already living in their household, this program will create a unique active partnership between child and cat that considers the health and wellbeing of both partners. Recent pilot work by PIs Udell & MacDonald has revealed physical and social-emotional improvements in children with and without developmental disabilities following a pet dog-partner based AAI. Dogs also showed increased sociability and attachment towards their child partner after AAI participation. Work by PI Udell & Vitale has demonstrated that many cats are highly social and form strong attachment bonds with humans, that cats can be successfully trained a wide range of behaviors, including leash walking, and that cat training classes result in high participant retention rates. Cat social behavior and welfare is also heavily influenced by human behavior and training, making it highly likely that cats would also benefit from this program. There remains a critical need for further empirical evaluation of AAI practices, especially those that target the specific needs of at-risk populations and youth. Further extending the development and evaluation of activity-based AAIs beyond those that include dogs and horses also helps address the critical need to consider and include diverse human participants, creating new equitable opportunities for AAI involvement to those who may have access to cats, but not dogs and horses (due to practical, health, cultural, socio-economic, or other personal reasons).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The experimental group will take part in the CAT intervention after baseline assessments. All cat-training methods will be positive reinforcement based, using owner-approved food, toys and social reinforcers (e.g. petting).
Time frame: T3 is approximately 14 months after T1 (baseline).
Cats in the intervention group participated in a structured three-phase assessment: two minutes in the testing room with their child owner, two minutes alone, and then a reunion phase when the child returns. All sessions were video recorded. Two independent raters classified each cat's attachment style using a predefined behavioral ethogram, with primary emphasis on the cat's response during the reunion. Possible attachment classifications include Secure, Insecure-Ambivalent, Insecure-Avoidant, Insecure-Disorganized. Data presented describe within-cat change in attachment classification from T1 to T3, specifically the shift from insecure (inclusive of ambivalent, avoidant, and disorganized) to secure attachment.
Time frame: T2 is approximately 6 weeks after T1 (baseline).
The Cat Care Responsibility Inventory "Walk" variable reflected responses to the item, "Usually walks cat." Children indicated the household member for whom this statement was most true (e.g., self, mother, father, sibling, or other). For analysis, responses were coded as a binary variable such that s child either participated in walking the cat (alone or with others in the household) or did not. These binary outcomes were then compared across time points and participant groups.
Time frame: T2 is approximately 6 weeks after T1 (baseline).
Participants completed a 7-item Emotional Support survey from the NIH Toolbox (NIH Toolbox Item Bank v2.0), validated for children ages 8-17. The survey uses a five-point Likert scale (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Usually, Always) to assess children's experiences of emotional support during the past month. Items ask about perceived access to supportive relationships over the preceding month. Sample question: "I have someone who will listen to me when I need to talk."
Scoring Process: Each survey is scored using Item Response Theory (IRT). An IRT-derived theta score is generated for each participant, as is an Uncorrected Standard Score (T-score).
Interpretation: For the NIH Toolbox Emotional Support Survey, higher scores are indicative of more emotional support. Scores 1 SD or more below the mean (T ≤ 40) suggest low levels of support, and scores 1 SD or more above the mean (T ≥ 60) suggest high levels of support. T-scores ≤ 40 may warrant heightened surveillance or concern.
Oregon State University
Other
The Development and Evaluation of a Novel Cat Assisted Training (CAT) Intervention for Youth With Developmental Disabilities and Their Family Cat
Acronym: CAT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07393776
Behavior, Comparison Group
Lubbock, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05949320
Cardiovascular Diseases, Control Group
North Point, Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT07076381
Control Group, Counseling
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05220618
Control Group, Training Group
Valencia, Conunidad Valencia, Spain
View Trial Details