Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04354623

Developing a Falls Prediction Tool Using Both Accelerometer and Video Gait Analysis Data in Older Adults

Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures (accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensor data) in older adults monitored longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and then validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing for better targeting of vulnerable patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, VGH Research Pavilion Room 186

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada

About this study

Recent advances in machine learning have disrupted the standard approach to assessing medical prognosis. Our group, consisting of academic clinicians and research engineers, seeks to create a database of stability measures ( accelerometers, gyroscopes and altitude sensors data) in older adults monitores longitudinally. This Stability Measures (SM) database will allow us to use new machine learning methods to develop and validate algorithms that predict future falls, allowing to better targetting of vulnerable individuals.

Although there have been numerous attempts to quantify fall risk in older adults using bedside scales 7-12, no previous group has attempted to use a combination of both accelerometer and video measures to assess gait stability. Since these measures will be captured in both frequently falling and infrequently falling patients, we will have SM data for various windows of time (1, 2, 3 and 4-weeks) prior to at least 100 fall events, a dataset that has never been captured before.

HYPOTHESES:

  • A combination of accelerometer, gyroscope, and video data can be used to predict falls longitudinally, first by the use of a training dataset followed by verification on a validation data set.
  • All the above sensor-based inputs can be combined as a simple, automated predcition tool to predict fall risk in older adults Current Methods of Falls Risk Assessment: Current methods of predicting falls in physician offices rely heavily on simple bedside tests12-14. Although useful, all of these measures have quite low sensitivity and specificity, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of approximately 0.707-12.

In fact, a recent meta-analysis "could not identify any tool which had an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity, or which was clearly better than a simple clinical judgment of risk of falling"

METHODS:

a) Subjects: i) High Risk Subjects (n=50): All subjects will be recruited from falls and geriatrics clinics at Vancouver General Hospital. These clinics see about 2500 patients per year and are currently used for research recruitment. Each clinic patient has gait speed measured, which will allow to recruit both high and low risk fallers. This test will allow us to recruit 50 subjects at marked risk for falls, providing us with prospectively gathered dataset of greater than 100 events, five times higher than any other sensor study.

ii) Low Risk Subjects (n=50): In addition, we will use newspaper advertisements to recruit and then screen low risk subjects. All subjects will have a gait speed > 0.8 m/s and have had no falls in the last year.

All study patients with come to the laboratory (Gerontology and Diabetes Research Laboratory, VGH Research Pavilion) for a one hour session. Each subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system. In addition, a Xethru X4M03 kit was will be used to collect ultra-sideband radar data (UWB). The UWB radar operates in 5.9-10.3 GHz, providing high spatial resolution. The radar is placed 1.5 m above the floor level. To collect heel-toe strike timing data, the subject will ambulate on the GAITRite system (CIR Systems Inc, Franklin, NJ), with a 90 × 700-cm × 3.2-mm walkway.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All subjects must be aged 65 years and older • All subjects must have had at least one fall in the last year and have been referred to the falls clinic (High Risk Subjects) OR have had no falls on the last year and have responded to our newspaper advertisement (Low Risk Subjects)

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects age less than 65 years old

Treatment and study plan

A 6-minute walk test

Other

Each subject will perform a 6-minute walk test during which gait assessment will be obtained from the APDM system (Portland, OR). In addition there will be four video cameras (on the front, back and sides) that will measure raw video data for our gait analysis. The camera does not record any facial data (in fact, 'deepfake' software in the system deletes all facial details) and the patient's movements are converted to a 'stick figure' prior to being saved in the system.

Other names: Video recording

Primary outcomes

  1. Classification of accuracy of the algorithm on the validation dataset

    Time frame: 60 min

    Consisting of True positive (TP), False positive (FP) rate, Precision, Recall (similar to sensitivity), F-measure (conveys the balance between precision and recall) and the Receiver Operation Curve area

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia

Other

Registry information

Acronym: APDM system

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 21, 2020
Registry last updated
May 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.