Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04719403

Determining Feasibility and Acceptability of Sharing Video Recordings With Patients With ALS and Caregivers

Our objective in the proposed project is to: (a) operationalize and determine the feasibility and acceptability of a trial where clinic multi-disciplinary clinic (MDC) visits are audio/video recorded and shared with patients with ALS and their caregivers; (b) gather preliminary data examining the impact of routinely adding audio/video recordings of clinic visits to UC on self-management ability and other behavioral, health and health services outcomes at baseline (T0) and other regular interviews from enrollment (T1= 1 Week, T2= 3 Months); and (c) identify factors pertinent to the acceptability of our study protocol and the audio/video recording of visits.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Central Nervous System Diseases Metabolic Diseases Motor Neuron Disease Nervous System Diseases Neurodegenerative Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Proteostasis Deficiencies Spinal Cord Diseases TDP-43 Proteinopathies

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03766, United States

About this study

We will conduct a single-site, two-arm, parallel group, patient-randomized, controlled, pilot trial with 3-month follow up, to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of sharing audio/video recordings of multidisciplinary ALS clinics with patients and their caregivers. We will recruit 24 patients with ALS and their caregivers over a recruitment period of 1 year. We are primarily interested in determining the feasibility of the trial and acceptability of the audio/video intervention. We will also explore the impact on the patients' ability to self-manage their care as well as exploratory outcomes, at baseline (T0 = pre-visit), at T1 (1 week), and at T2 (3 months).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosed and primarily treated for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
  • Aged 18 years or greater
  • Can communicate in English (verbally, on a computer, or with assistance)
  • Have email
  • Have internet access
  • Willing to have their multidisciplinary clinic visit audio/video recorded for a 3 month period

Exclusion criteria

  • Those without the capacity to provide consent, either themselves or via proxy

Treatment and study plan

HealthPAL

Other

Participants who are randomly assigned to the HealthPAL arm will have immediate post- visit access to audio/video-recordings of their clinical visit through a HIPAA-compliant web-based program called HealthPAL.

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Enrollment (Feasibility)

    Time frame: Study Completion, an average of 1 year

    Meeting the targeted recruitment number and rate (two patients per month over a 12 month period)

  2. Intervention Fidelity (Feasibility)

    Time frame: Three months

    The proportion of ALS MDC (multidisciplinary clinic) patients in the intervention arm that received the VIDEO intervention with full adherence to a pre-defined protocol fidelity checklist. Any deviations will be documented.

  3. Patient use of the Intervention (Acceptability)

    Time frame: Three months

    The proportion of ALS MDC (multidisciplinary clinic) patients in the intervention arm who used the recording between the day of receipt and the three-month follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Patient Satisfaction, as measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18)

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are measured on an 18-item, 5-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "strongly agree" and a score of 5 indicating "Strongly Disagree". Scores range from 18 to 90, with lower scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction.

  2. Change from baseline in adherence to treatment, as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study - General Adherence

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are measured on a 5-item, 6-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "None of the time" and a score of 6 indicating "All of the time". Scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher levels of adherence. Items 1 and 3 are scored in reverse.

  3. Change from baseline in adherence to medications, as measured by the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale - 7 (ARMS-7)

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are measured on a 7-item, 4-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "None" and a score of 4 indicating "All". Scores range from 7 to 28, with lower scores indicating higher levels of adherence.

  4. Change from baseline in adherence to physical therapy, as measured by the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS)

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are measured on a 6-item, 5-level scale, with 0 indicating "Completely agree" and 4 indicating "Completely disagree". Scores range from 0 to 30, where a higher score indicates a higher level of adherence.

  5. Change from baseline in anxiety, as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7)

    Time frame: Baseline, three months

    Scores are based on a 7-item, 4-level scale with 0 indicating "Not at all" and 3 indicating "Nearly every day". Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

  6. Change from baseline in functional status, as measured by the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS)

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are measured on a 13-item, 5-level scale, with 0 indicating low function and 4 indicating high functioning, and one item as "yes/no". Scores range from 0 to 48, with high scores indicating higher levels of functioning.

  7. Change from baseline in depression, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8)

    Time frame: Baseline, three months

    Scores are based on a 8-item, 4-level scale with 0 indicating "Not at all" and 3 indicating "Nearly every day". Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.

  8. Level of Communication in the Visit, as measured by the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC)

    Time frame: One week

    Scores are based on an 18-item, 5-level scale with 1 indicating "Never" and 5 indicating "Always". Scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating higher levels of communication.

  9. Level of literacy, as measured by the Single Item Literacy Screener

    Time frame: Baseline

    Scores are measured on a single item, 5-level scale. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of literacy.

  10. Change in caregiver burden, as measured by the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers - Short (BSFC-s)

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are based on a 10-item, 4-level scale, with 0 indicating strongly disagree and 3 indicating strongly agree. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicate higher levels of burden.

  11. Change in caregiver preparedness, as measured by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are based on a 9-item, 5-level scale, with 0 indicating not at all prepared, and 4 indicating very well prepared. Scores range from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating higher levels of preparedness.

  12. Change in self-efficacy, as measured by the Self Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease scale

    Time frame: Baseline, one week, three months

    Scores are measured on 6x 10-item scales. Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-efficacy.

  13. Feasibility of the Intervention, as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Metric (FIM)

    Time frame: Three months from baseline

    Scores are measured on a 4-item, 5-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of feasibility.

  14. Acceptability of the Intervention, as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Metric (AIM)

    Time frame: Three months from baseline

    Scores are measured on a 4-item, 5-level scale, with a score of 1 indicating "completely disagree" and 5 indicating "completely agree". Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • The Diamond Endowment Project

Registry information

Official study title

Determining the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Effectiveness of Sharing Video Recordings of Multidisciplinary ALS Clinics With Patients and Their Caregivers

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 22, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.