Aarhus University
Aarhus, Central Jutland, 8000, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT05561829
Previous research has shown the efficacy of (combinations of) individual components of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), namely sleep hygiene education, sleep restriction, stimulus control therapy, deactivation/relaxation training, and cognitive therapy. However, their relative effects, i.e., their effects in direct comparison with each other, are yet to be assessed. By means of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), this study aims to investigate the components' relative efficacy in order to identify the most effective component or combination of components for digitized treatment of chronic insomnia. A future study will verify this intervention's effect in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus, Central Jutland, 8000, Denmark
The DOSE Project employs the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to evaluate the relative efficacy of the individual cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) components. The present study represents the optimization phase of MOST, which aims to identify which combination of CBT-I components produces the best expected outcome, while taking constraints, such as economy, scalability, treatment complexity, and usability, into account.
The main objectives of the DOSE Project are
This study employs a fractional factorial experimental design conducted with individuals experiencing moderate-to-severe insomnia. With random allocation, participants will receive a version of the application in which one or more of the five core CBT-I components (i.e., sleep hygiene education, sleep restriction, stimulus control therapy, deactivation/relaxation training, cognitive therapy) are presented in various combinations. The intervention lasts 10 weeks, including an initial one-week assessment period.
Baseline group differences (concerning socio-demographic, disease-related, and psychosocial data) will be explored to test the success of the randomization. If differences are found, sensitivity analyses will be made to evaluate their possible influence on the results. Main effects will be analysed using Mixed Linear Models (MLMs) based on the intent-to-treat sample, comparing aggregated groups of N = 2 x 320 (e.g., plus/minus sleep restriction or plus/minus sleep hygiene etc.) on all outcome variables. MLMs account for the hierarchical, non-independent nature of the data (i.e., repeated measures nested within patients and treatment conditions), testing the time*group interaction effect, reflecting the effect of treatment. Moderation analyses will evaluate whether individual differences in various baseline variables (e.g., physical function, expectations, computer proficiency, chronotype, etc.) influence intervention effects.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Automated digital administration of a sleep optimization module via mobile or web application, lasting approximately six weeks. Based on the participant's situation and needs, sleep restriction, sleep compression, or circadian-rhythm normalization is advised and conducted. The aim is to optimise the participant's sleep efficiency.
Automated digital administration of a stimulus control therapy module via mobile or web application, lasting approximately six weeks. The aim is to strengthen associations between sleep and the sleep environment and to eliminate conditioning of non-sleep behavior and the sleep environment.
Automated digital administration of a relaxation training module via mobile or web application, lasting approximately six weeks. The aim is to reduce somatic tension and limit intrusive thought processes that interfere with sleep.
Automated digital administration of a cognitive therapy module via mobile or web application, lasting approximately six weeks. The aim is to identify, challenge, and modify dysfunctional beliefs about sleep.
Automated digital administration of a sleep hygiene education module via mobile or web application, lasting approximately six weeks. The aim is to identify and modify environmental and lifestyle factors that may interfere with sleep.
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), with scores ranging from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicate higher insomnia severity, and a score equal to or above 10 indicates clinical significance.
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), with scores ranging from 0 to 28, where higher scores indicate higher insomnia severity, and a score equal to or above 10 indicates clinical significance.
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD), which measures sleep- and waking time, sleep onset latency, wakefulness after initial sleep onset, early morning awakenings, and getting-up time, allowing for total sleep time, total time in bed, and sleep efficiency to be calculated.
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD), which measures sleep- and waking time, sleep onset latency, wakefulness after initial sleep onset, early morning awakenings, and getting-up time, allowing for total sleep time, total time in bed, and sleep efficiency to be calculated.
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), which measures clinically derived domains of sleep difficulties (i.e., subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction).
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), which measures clinically derived domains of sleep difficulties (i.e., subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction).
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which covers physical fatigue, functional fatigue, and social consequences of fatigue.
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), which covers physical fatigue, functional fatigue, and social consequences of fatigue.
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS-16).
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS-16).
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), which addresses different aspects of emotional states and daily activities. The questionnaire allows for sub-scores for mental and physical health to be calculated based on population norms, with higher scores indicating better health.
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), which addresses different aspects of emotional states and daily activities. The questionnaire allows for sub-scores for mental and physical health to be calculated based on population norms, with higher scores indicating better health.
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), which evaluates the constructs depression, anxiety, and stress on sub-scales.
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), which evaluates the constructs depression, anxiety, and stress on sub-scales.
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the 5-item World Health Organisation's Well-Being Index (WHO-5).
Time frame: 6 months (180 days) after post-questionnaire, approximately 8,5 months after study entry (randomization).
Assessed with the 5-item World Health Organisation's Well-Being Index (WHO-5).
Time frame: 11 weeks after study entry (randomization)
Assessed with the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ).
University of Aarhus
Other
Determination of Optimal Sleep Treatment Elements (The DOSE Project)
Acronym: DOSE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02967185
Dyssomnias, Insomnia Chronic
View Trial DetailsNCT04598672
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05917379
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06550388
Dyssomnias, Insomnia Chronic
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details