Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01629706

Determination of Cell Population in Solution-Induced Corneal Staining (SICS) and Symptomatic Versus Asymptomatic Lens Wearers

The purpose of the study is to investigate the corneal epithelial cell response associated with lens wear that results in solution-induced corneal staining (Phase1) and to determine the cell appearance in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers (Phase 2).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Refractive Error Dry Eye Dry Eye Syndromes Eye Diseases Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases Refractive Errors

Age range

17 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

This study consisted of 2 phases. In Phase 1, participants wore contact lenses pre-soaked overnight in contact lens solution for 2 hours and 4 hours, separate days. A minimum of 7 days separated the wear periods. Ocular surface cells were collected after both wear periods. In Phase 2, participants wore their habitual contact lenses on a daily wear basis for 4 weeks with habitual lens care. Ocular surface cells were collected after Day 1 and Day 28. Phase 2 included eligible participants who completed Phase 1 and new participants. A participant was considered to be asymptomatic if he/she can typically wear contact lenses comfortably for at least 10 hours/day a minimum of 5 days/week, and symptomatic if he/she typically wears contact lenses for a minimum of 3 days/week and experiences ocular discomfort after less than 6 hours of wear. Phase 1 participants not eligible to participate in Phase 2 or uninterested in continuing into Phase 2 were exited from the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(Phase 1):

  • Full legal capacity to volunteer.
  • Read and sign an informed consent form.
  • Willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
  • Current or previous contact lens wearer and competent to insert and remove contact lenses.
  • Up-to-date spectacles.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Inclusion criteria

(Phase 2):

  • Full legal capacity to volunteer.
  • Read and sign an informed consent form.
  • Willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
  • Up-to-date spectacles.
  • Wears single vision silicone hydrogel contact lenses, following a monthly replacement schedule.
  • Has worn the same lens type for a minimum of 2 months, with the exception of the 2 periods of lens wear for participants who were also in Phase 1.
  • Has used the same type of cleaning solution for a minimum of 2 months.
  • Currently wears brand name contact lenses and uses brand name cleaning solutions that are commercially available in Canada (no private labels).
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

(Phase 1 and 2):

  • Any ocular disease.
  • Systemic condition that may affect a study outcome variable.
  • Use of any systemic or topical medications that may affect ocular health.
  • Known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study.
  • Presents with significant amounts of corneal staining.
  • Current use of artificial tears and/or rewetting drops.
  • Wears contact lenses on an extended (overnight) or continuous wear schedule.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Balafilcon A contact lens

Device

Commercially marketed silicone hydrogel contact lens

Other names: PureVision™

Habitual Contact Lenses

Device

Commercially marketed silicone hydrogel contact lenses as prescribed by eye care practitioner, brand and power

Renu multi-purpose solution

Device

Commercially marketed solution for use in removing protein, cleaning, conditioning, and disinfecting contact lenses.

Other names: renu® fresh™

ClearCare

Device

Commercially marketed hydrogen peroxide system for cleaning and disinfecting contact lenses

Other names: ClearCare®

Habitual lens care

Device

Lens care per habitual use

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Number of Viable Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface After 2 Hours and 4 Hours of Wear, Phase 1

    Time frame: Day 1 after 2 hours of wear; Day 7 after 4 hours of wear

    The worn contact lenses were removed and epithelial (corneal) cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Immediately following the eyewash, samples were taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/ dead stains. The number of viable (alive) cells was counted using a microscope. Cells collected from the right and the left eye were analyzed separately. A significant difference in viable cell count may indicate a physiological response to the contact lens and/or care regimen over time.

  2. Mean Number of Non-Viable Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface After 2 Hours and 4 Hours of Wear, Phase 1

    Time frame: Day 1 after 2 hours of wear; Day 7 after 4 hours of wear

    The worn contact lenses were removed and epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Immediately following the eyewash, samples were taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/dead stains. The number of non-viable (dead) cells was counted using a microscope. Cells collected from the right and the left eye were analyzed separately. A significant difference in non-viable cell count may indicate a physiological response to the contact lens and/or care regimen over time.

  3. Mean Number of Fluorescein-Stained Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface After 2 Hours and 4 Hours of Wear, Phase 1

    Time frame: Day 1 after 2 hours of wear; Day 7 after 4 hours of wear

    The worn contact lenses were removed and epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Immediately following the eyewash, samples were taken to a laboratory. The total number of fluorescein-stained cells was counted using a microscope. Cells collected from the right and the left eye were analyzed separately. A significant difference in fluorescein-stained cell count may indicate a physiological response to the contact lens and/or care regimen over time.

  4. Ratio of Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface and Cells Collected From the Contact Lens After 2 Hours and 4 Hours of Wear, Phase 1

    Time frame: Day 1 after 2 hours of wear; Day 7 after 4 hours of wear

    The worn contact lenses were removed, rinsed and transferred in individual glass vials. Epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Samples were taken to a laboratory and cells collected from each lens and each eye were counted separately using a microscope. The ratio of cells collected from the ocular surface and from the contact lens was calculated. A higher number indicates a higher percentage of cells collected from the contact lenses relative to the total number of cells collected.

  5. Ratio of Viable and Non-Viable Epithelial Cells After 2 Hours and 4 Hours of Wear, Phase 1

    Time frame: Day 1 after 2 hours of wear; Day 7 after 4 hours of wear

    The worn contact lenses were removed, rinsed and transferred in individual glass vials. Epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Samples were taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/dead stains. Cells collected from each lens and each eye were counted separately using a microscope. The number of viable and non-viable cells was counted using a microscope. The ratio between viable and non-viable cell counts was calculated.

    A higher number indicates a higher percentage of non-viable cells relative to the total cell count.

  6. Mean Number of Viable Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface at Day 1 and Week 4, Phase 2

    Time frame: Day 1 and Week 4

    The worn contact lenses were removed and epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Immediately following the eyewash, samples were taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/dead stains. The number of viable cells was counted using a microscope. Cells collected from right and left eyes were pooled. Samples were collected after 8 hours of wear. A significant difference in cell count may indicate a physiological response to contact lens wear due to lens age.

  7. Mean Number of Non-Viable Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface at Day 1 and Week 4, Phase 2

    Time frame: Day 1 and Week 4

    The worn contact lenses were removed and epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Immediately following the eyewash, samples were taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/dead stains. The number of non-viable cells was counted using a microscope. Cells collected from right and left eyes were pooled.Samples were collected after 8 hours of wear. A significant difference in cell count may indicate a physiological response to contact lens wear due to lens age

  8. Mean Number of Epithelial Cells Collected From the Contact Lens at Day 1 and Week 4, Phase 2

    Time frame: Day 1 and Week 4

    The worn contact lenses were removed and transferred into well plates, each containing a soaking solution. Following a soaking duration of approximately 30 minutes, lenses were rinsed and transferred in individual glass vials. The cell content from the lens wash was taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/dead stains. The total number of cells (viable and non-viable) were counted using a microscope. Cells collected from right and left lens were pooled. Samples were collected after 8 hours of wear. A significant difference in cell count may indicate a physiological response to contact lens wear due to lens age.

  9. Mean Number of Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface at Day 1 and Week 4, Phase 2

    Time frame: Day 1 and Week 4

    The worn contact lenses were removed and epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Immediately following the eyewash, samples were taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/dead stains. The number of cells (viable and non-viable) was counted using a microscope. Cells collected from right and left eyes were pooled. Samples were collected after 8 hours of wear. A significant difference in cell count may indicate a physiological response to contact lens wear due to lens age.

  10. Ratio of Epithelial Cells Collected Directly From the Ocular Surface and Cells Collected From the Contact Lens at Day 1 and Week 4, Phase 2

    Time frame: Day 1 and Week 4

    The worn contact lenses were removed, rinsed and transferred in individual glass vials. Epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Samples were taken to a laboratory and cells collected from the right and the left eye were combined; cells collected from the right and the left lens were combined. The ratio of cells collected from the ocular surface and from the contact lens was calculated. A higher number indicates a higher percentage of cells collected from the contact lenses relative to the total number of cells collected.

  11. Ratio of Viable and Non-Viable Epithelial Cells at Day 1 and Week 4, Phase 2

    Time frame: Day 1 and Week 4

    The worn contact lenses were removed, rinsed and transferred in individual glass vials. Epithelial cells were collected directly from the ocular surface using an eyewash. Samples were taken to a laboratory and incubated with live/dead stains. Cells collected from the right and the left eye were combined; cells collected from the right and the left lens were combined. The number of viable and non-viable cells was counted using a microscope. The ratio between viable and non-viable cell counts was calculated. A higher number indicates a higher percentage of non-viable cells relative to the total cell count.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

CIBA VISION

Industry

Collaborators

  • University of Waterloo

Registry information

Official study title

Determination of Cell Population in SICS and Symptomatic Versus Asymptomatic Lens Wearers

Acronym: ABBOTSFORD

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jun 28, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 3, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.