Institut Cœur-Poumon - Médecine aiguë gériatrique
Lille, France
NCT Number: NCT05923983
Current evidence shows that computerized decision support systems (CDSS) have shown to be insufficiently effective to prevent adverse drug reactions (ADRs) at large scale (e.g. whole hospital). Several barriers for successful implementation of CDSS have been identified: over-alerting, lack of specificity of rules, and physician interruption during prescription. The effectiveness of CDSS could be increased in two ways. Firstly, by creating rules that are more specific to a given adverse drug reaction: the current study focuses on acute renal failure and hyperkalemia (two serious and frequent ADR in older hospitalized patients). Secondly, by involving the pharmacist in the review of the alerts so that he/she can transmit, if deemed necessary, a pharmaceutical recommendation to the clinician. This procedure will reduce over-alerting and prevent task interruption.
The hypothesis is that the use of specific rules created by a multidisciplinary team and implemented in a CDSS, combined with a strategy for managing and transmitting alerts, can reduce specific ADRs such as hyperkalemia and acute renal failure.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lille, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In the intervention group, the pharmaceutical validation will be based on routine care, often on entry to a ward and by analysis of all the alerts produced by the CDSS. Some alerts will result in a pharmaceutical intervention being provided to the medical team
In the control group, the pharmaceutical validation will be based on routine care, often on entry to a ward or in a particular situation
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 20 days
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 20 days
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 15 days
Therapeutic changes within 72 hours of a CDSS alert for acute renal failure or hyperkalemia. Therapeutic changes include discontinuation of drug therapy, introduction of a new drug, dose reduction or change of drug
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 20 days
Relevance of CDSS alerts is defined in a standard way. Each CDSS alert is evaluated by a clinical pharmacist according to their own expertise and data available in the EHR. If the alert was deemed not relevant, the clinical pharmacist did not perform any pharmaceutical intervention. The CDSS software register the classification of the alert as "not relevant". This approach was used the last 4 years in our hospital and as been published in an article published in the International Journal of Medical Informatics: Cuvelier E, Robert L, Musy E, Rousselière C, Marcilly R, Gautier S, Odou P, Beuscart JB, Décaudin B. The clinical pharmacist's role in enhancing the relevance of a clinical decision support system. Int J Med Inform. 2021 Nov;155:104568. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104568. Epub 2021 Sep 2. PMID: 34537687
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 20 days
When an alert is received by the pharmacist, it is analyzed and the pharmacist forwards a pharmaceutical intervention to the physician in charge of the patient to propose a modification of the treatment (dosage, dose, stop
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 20 days
Changes in the work system are identified through a comparison of its elements (tools, tasks, organization, interactions, work environment, professionals), before and after the introduction of alerts, using qualitative system engineering methods.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 20 days
Use medico-economic data such as time spent treating an alert, cost of treating an adverse drug reaction to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention
University Hospital, Lille
Other
Reduction of Acute Renal Failure and/or Hyperkaliemia Adverse Drug Events in Older Inpatients by Incorporating Specific Rules Into a Computerized Support System and Dedicated Procedures: a Randomized Trial.
Acronym: DETECT-IP:
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04087291
Agnosia, Back Pain
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06636292
Behavior, Health Behavior
South Shields, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05890170
Behavior, Bone Graft; Complications
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06525194
Acceptability of Health Care, Behavior
Izmir, Konak, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details