Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03142750

Design of a Dressing for Gastrostomy Buttons in Pediatric Population

Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) complications, such as granulation tissue formation and tube dislodgements, are frequent causes of emergency department visits. The investigators have developed two G-tube dressing designs using commercially available materials and products to decrease the risk of G-tube related complications. The investigators aim in this study is to pilot two novel G-tube dressings in patients with pre-existing G-tubes to gain parental feedback on device designs, ease of use and G-tube stability in preparation for a final design and trial. Based on the feedback, further iterations will be developed and trialed in eligible study subjects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

31 day–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Hospital Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

About this study

In order to address complications associated with gastrostomy buttons (G-buttons) or tubes (G-tubes) in children, the investigators developed two multi-component securement dressings. The purpose of this study is to try these dressings and obtain parental feedback.

This will involve survey using questionnaires before and after the use of two different G-tube dressings. Eligible patients will be identified by a nurse practitioner or attending surgeon. The researcher will obtain consent from the patient or their parents/legal guardian. The investigators will ask a series of questions regarding their current experience dressing and maintaining G-tube stomas. A week supply of each new prototype dressing will be provided to the patient or parent. Caregivers will be educated on the use of each dressing and will be given a number to call should they have any questions or concerns. The dressings will be changed daily and as needed. Once the patient is enrolled and provided with dressings, the investigators will perform a follow up telephone interview at one week to evaluate their experience and ensure they did not experience any adverse events. Caregivers will be given a second questionnaire to collect feedback on the dressings after two weeks either in person or over the telephone. They will be asked to choose their preferred dressing, provide feedback on advantages and disadvantages of each type and report adverse events. For inpatients, the investigators will obtain opinions from parents, patients, nurses and doctors. Photographs will be obtained at each outpatient visit or during the inpatient period for objective comparison.

Once more iterations are developed, they will undergo the same clinical trial process (involving 10-15 subjects).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a pre-existing a G-tube
  • Patients presenting to the G-tube or surgery clinic for G-tube replacement at Children's Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.
  • Patients admitted to the hospital with a pre-existing G-tube for reasons unrelated to the G-tube will be eligible for the study if they have issues with the G-tube site.

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusal to participate
  • Those with other types of gastrostomy tubes (other than Mini Balloon Button)
  • Those whose parents or legal guardians cannot be reached by telephone
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant women
  • Decisionally challenged subjects

Treatment and study plan

Gastrostomy tube dressing

Device

Two types of dressings to secure gastrostomy tube in children

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Satisfied With Current Dressings

    Time frame: Baseline

    Overall satisfaction of the current dressings used at baseline were assessed using a qualitative questionnaire. Questionnaires queried the level of agreement in the following aspects: overall satisfaction, ease of use, adequate level of security for the G-button, adherence to skin, ability to absorb leakage, cost, availability at drug store, allergenic potential and reusability. Answer choices to measure level of satisfaction were: strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree. Surveys also included open-ended questions about participant satisfaction. Survey responses were evaluated and determined to indicate "Satisfied" or "Not Satisfied" by the Investigators.This measurement reflects participants satisfaction with whatever dressing they were currently using at baseline, not with the study interventions to which they were assigned.

  2. Number of Participants Satisfied With Experimental Dressings

    Time frame: 1 Week

    Overall satisfaction of the dressings when assessed using a qualitative questionnaire. Questionnaires queried the level of agreement in the following aspects: overall satisfaction, ease of use, adequate level of security for the G-button, ease of connecting and disconnecting the feeding tube, reduction in leakage, painless device removal, improvement in gastrostomy wound appearance, preference over the traditional dressing, and whether they would purchase the securement device if it was commercially available. Answer choices to measure level of satisfaction were: strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree. Surveys also included open-ended questions about participant satisfaction. Survey responses were evaluated and determined to indicate "Satisfied" or "Not Satisfied" by the Investigators.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
May 5, 2017
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.