Nova Scotia Health
Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), B3L 4P1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03903484
Medications can help older adults but can also harm them. Frail older adults tend to have many health problems that require treatment, but are also at risk of harm from the medications prescribed. This makes it hard to get older adults the treatments they need and keep them safe from the harms from medications. It ends up that a lot of visits to emergency rooms and hospitals are due to medications, especially for older adults. Previous research has shown the benefits of stopping medications older adults no longer need. Even so, healthcare professionals do not always do this as well as they could. Our goal is to make a collection of resources for pharmacists who work with doctors and nurses in primary settings that will help support older adults as they safely stop medications that are no longer needed. The investigators will use knowledge and tools that are already known and published. In the first six months the team, which includes older adults and their families, pharmacists, doctors, nurses, and healthcare policymakers developed a framework and resource toolbox that pharmacists can use to help older adults stop medications that are no longer needed. In the remaining 10 months, the investigators will use the resource toolbox in primary healthcare teams and nursing homes. Overall, the investigators expect that by using the resources the pharmacists will be able to support patients stop medications they no longer need and help reduce the number of pills people take, reduce drug costs, reduce harms from medication use and improve quality of life for frail older adults and their loved ones.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), B3L 4P1, Canada
As frailty and medical comorbidity increases, the number of medications used increases. The resultant polypharmacy is intended to improve the health status; however, large observational studies refute this premise. In fact, polypharmacy (more than 3 medications) is associated with increased hospitalization (OR 3.79, 95% CI {1.33, 10.90}) and increased mortality (OR 1.27, 95% CI {1.04, 1.56}). With increasing polypharmacy, the risk of adverse health outcomes increases so it is important that deprescribing initiatives are promoted to reduce medication use to improve patient outcomes.
Numerous tools exist that can be used to identify Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM), including; Beer's list, STOPP/START, PRISCUS, LAROCHE, Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), Drug Burden Index, Anticholinergic Drug Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale, and numerous deprescribing tools from the Canadian Deprescribing Network. The implementation of these tools is not as high as it could or should be, as evidenced by polypharmacy data, such as the 2011 study that found 30% of Canadian seniors aged 65 to 79 took at least five prescription medications concurrently. It is likely that medication use is greater among the oldest old.
The literature is replete with evidence and tools to identify the medications that are the most likely to cause adverse events, however this information is not being translated into practice as medication use and PIM use persists in older adults. Deprescribing is the process of withdrawal of an inappropriate medication supervised by a healthcare professional with the goal of managing polypharmacy and improving outcomes. Healthcare practitioners self-identify that deprescribing is a challenging process. Primary care physicians have increasingly complex patient loads, which contributes to increased numbers of specialist involvement. This makes it challenging to know which medications are necessary and which can be discontinued and whose responsibility it is to initiate and monitor the deprescribing process. In Nova Scotia media has brought attention to PIM use with our high rates of benzodiazepine use. Recent publications have also identified high use of antipsychotics in Nova Scotia.
Previous work suggests including a pharmacist or nurse in deprescribing helps with its success. Indeed, prior work suggests that culture change, and integrated primary care can make a small difference in polypharmacy, but that more targeted interventions with specific engagement of pharmacists is needed. Pharmacists have extensive training in medication use, effects, safety and toxicity. They can identify and resolve medication related issues. Pharmacists can carry out treatment plans in a collaborative environment working with prescribers to monitor medication adherence, effect, and toxicity. Meta-analysis has identified 13 pharmacist led interventions to reduce polypharmacy, which included nine in primary care and two in nursing homes.
Society has a need for improved uptake of deprescribing to support appropriate drug use by adults. The tools and resources available have not led to widespread uptake/implementation. To date deprescribing remains one of the many demands on primary care providers (Family Physicians/Nurse Practitioners). The investigators consider the skill set of pharmacists as ideal to support and monitor patients as they move through the deprescribing process. The investigators recognize that deprescribing cannot happen without extensive communication with primary care providers so that all members of the healthcare team are aware and engaged with the patient and their deprescribing. In considering this collaborative practice clinics with pharmacists embedded in the practice have been identified as sites where pharmacist led deprescribing can successfully support patients through the deprescribing process. This pharmacist led deprescribing process will conform to the standard of care using an evidence supported framework for a selected number of drugs and using recognized deprescribing algorithms and guidelines.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pharmacist-led deprescribing plan with the patient which will include the patient's deprescribing goals. The intervention advocates for deprescribing according to recognized algorithms and guidelines which will be included in a resource toolbox/website.
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
Change in medication appropriateness index before and after the deprescribing intervention
Time frame: At the end of study (approximately 6 months after the start)
Mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) survey measuring satisfaction with deprescribing intervention using a five point Likert scale and open ended questioning.
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (separated 6 months)
Quality of life survey using EuroQol - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D)
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (separated 6 months)
Qualitative post intervention survey
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
The number of medications being used before and after the deprescribing intervention
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
The number of times medication are administered in a day before and after the deprescribing intervention
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
The number of medications used on the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale before and after the deprescribing intervention
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
The number of targeted medications used before and after the deprescribing intervention
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
Change in the number of drugs used before and after deprescribing intervention
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (separated 6 months)
Change in number of drugs with dose decreased that were not discontinued
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
The number patient participants that were on 5 or more medications before the deprescribing intervention and were on less than 5 medications after the deprescribing intervention
Time frame: Before and after deprescribing intervention (counts separated 6 months)
Change in medication cost before and after deprescribing intervention
Time frame: Comparison of the same 6 month period in the preceding year to the 6 month period of the deprescribing intervention
Number of unplanned hospitalizations
Time frame: Comparison of the same 6 month period in the preceding year to the 6 month period of the deprescribing intervention
Number of emergency department visits
Time frame: During deprescribing intervention (6 months in duration)
Withdrawal symptoms are discussed at every visit with a healthcare professional and are identified using a general scale (mild, moderate, severe).
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Other
A Collaborative Intervention for Streamlining Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Within Integrated Health-Care Teams
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03689049
Aged, Electronic Health Records
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03655405
Inappropriate Prescribing, Polypharmacy
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT03688542
Inappropriate Prescribing, Polypharmacy
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT02545257
Drug Therapy, Combination, Inappropriate Prescribing
Lohja, Finland
View Trial Details