Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05656924

Deploying Digital Prosthetic Interface Technology and Exercise in Dysvascular Amputees

The study will test a new approach to the design and implementation of socket and liner technology in individuals who lost a lower limb secondary to diabetes mellitus type II (herein referred to as dysvascular amputees). The technology-based intervention will be combined with an exercise program designed to improve the health status of dysvascular amputees.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston

Boston, Massachusetts, 02129, United States

About this study

The study will test the hypothesis that the use of a digital approach to the design and implementation of socket and liner technology (herein referred to as "digital prosthetic interface technology") leads to better health of the residuum (compared to traditional socket and liner technology). This hypothesis will be tested by recruiting a group of dysvascular amputees (herein meant to refer to individuals who lost a lower limb secondary diabetes mellitus type II) and by randomizing them to either receiving a digital prosthetic interface technology or a traditional socket and liner system. Furthermore, the study will assess if the digital prosthetic interface technology improves adherence to an exercise program and results in better clinical outcomes. To test this hypothesis, an exercise intervention will be deployed by relying on coaching and mobile health technology to encourage adherence to a walking program targeting dysvascular transtibial amputees. This exercise intervention is an extension of pilot work that demonstrated the suitability of mobile health technology to implement an exercise-based intervention program in dysvascular amputees.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral transtibial amputation within the past 6 years
  • Etiology secondary to complications of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) type II
  • Current use of a prosthesis, with at least 2 months prior use
  • K2 or K3 level (as determined using the Amputee Mobility Predictor assessment tool)
  • Own a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

  • Amputation due to cancer or macrotrauma or acute hemorrhage
  • Bilateral amputation
  • Medically or surgically unstable contralateral lower extremity as determined by medical criteria (e.g., critical limb ischemia)
  • Severe residual limb pain that limits function preventing participation in an exercise-based program
  • Medical conditions that would interfere with subject's participation in regular sustained exercise
  • Anthropometric characteristics that are not compatible with the technology used to scan the residuum and manufacture the liner and socket (e.g., a residuum circumference greater than 32 inches would not be compatible with the device used to scan the residuum)
  • Current pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

digital prosthetic interface technology

Device

Individuals randomized to this group will receive a socket and liner that are manufactured using a novel technique meant to achieve a better distribution of pressure on the residuum. The study is based on the hypothesis that an improvement in pressure distribution on the residuum will enable high adherence to an exercise program meant to improve health status in dysvascular amputees.

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in intra-socket interface pressure between the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline

    Pressure sensors inserted in the socket will be used to measure the pressure on the residuum when study participants are weight bearing. The pressure is measured in kilopascals (kPa). 1 kPa is approximately the pressure exerted by a 10-g mass resting on a 1-cm2 area.

  2. Difference in step counts between the two groups

    Time frame: 12 months

    The average number of steps over a period of 2 weeks will be provided by a wearable sensor (Oura ring). The data will be expressed in number of steps per day.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in thermal imaging measures of the temperature of the residuum in the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline

    A thermal camera will be used to measure the peak temperature of the residuum. The residuum temperature will be measured in degrees Celsius.

  2. Difference in Socket Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) scores in the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Socket Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ) consists of a battery of questions inquiring about subject's comfort using a socket. The SEQ uses a visual analog scale format. The output ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

  3. Difference in Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) scores in the two groups

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) consists of a battery of questions inquiring about subject's perception of his/her prosthesis. The PEQ uses a visual analog scale format. The output ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Bionic Skins LLC
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Registry information

Official study title

Improving the Health Status of Dysvascular Amputees by Deploying Digital Prosthetic Interface Technology in Combination With an Exercise Intervention

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Dec 19, 2022
Registry last updated
Apr 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.