Abubakr Mohamed Fouad
Cairo, 002, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05555719
Fixed Functional Appliances comparisons in treatment of orthodontic class II malocclusion cases
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 002, Egypt
Comparison between two types of fixed functional appliances, the first one is the Mandibular Protraction Appliances, while the second one was the PowerScope Appliance.
the treatment duration was 6 months the patients age was considered according to Baccetti et al, CVMI 3,4
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mandibular Protraction Appliance was installed on fixed orthodontic appliance
PowerScope Appliance was installed on fixed orthodontic appliance
Time frame: 6 months
Anteroposterior postition of maxilla in relation to the anterior cranial base (SN line)
Time frame: 6 months
Anteroposterior postition of mandible in relation to the anterior cranial base (SN line)
Time frame: 6 months
The relationaship between maxilla and mandible
Time frame: 6 months
the length of the mandible (change in length before and after treatment)
Time frame: 6 months
the angle between inferior border of the mandible (Go Me) and the anterior cranial base (SN line)
Time frame: 6 months
The change of maxillary incisors inclination between the long axis of most protruded upper incisors and anterior cranial base (Sn line)
Time frame: 6 months
The change of mandibular incisors inclination between the long axis of most protruded upper incisors and anterior cranial base (Sn line)
Time frame: 6 months
the amount of upper lip retrusion in millimeter in relation to E line (line extended between pronasale and soft tissue pogonion points)
Time frame: 6 months
the amount of lower lip protrusion in millimeter in relation to E line (line extended between pronasale and soft tissue pogonion points)
Al-Azhar University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07454694
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07390357
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Wschowa, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05227859
Class II Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Damascus, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT06832475
Class II Malocclusion, IMPA Angle
Rome, Italy
View Trial Details