St. Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, 3435 CM, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Isabelle N Bax, MD
CONTACT
0883200929 ext. +31
Isabelle N Bax, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Lucas VA Boersma, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07021313
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by catheter ablation (CA) has become a widely accepted interventional treatment for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) despite anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD). Classic thermal ablation modalities use radiofrequency energy or cryo-energy to create cardiac tissue lesions. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) using pulsed field energy (PFA) is a novel technology for cardiac tissue ablation. Initial studies have shown favorable outcome data in patients with AF treated by performing PVI using PFA. However, the freedom of AF has not yet proven superior to existing thermal ablation methods and appears similarly associated with suboptimal lesion durability, leading to electrical reconnection. The purpose of this study is to determine if freedom of atrial fibrillation may be improved by delivering more and better targeted pulsed field ablations.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nieuwegein, 3435 CM, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Isabelle N Bax, MD
CONTACT
0883200929 ext. +31
Isabelle N Bax, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Lucas VA Boersma, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by catheter ablation (CA) has become a widely accepted interventional treatment for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) despite anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD). Classic thermal ablation modalities use radiofrequency energy or cryo-energy to create cardiac tissue lesions. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) using pulsed field energy (PFA) is a novel technology for cardiac tissue ablation. Initial studies have shown favorable outcome data in patients with AF treated by performing PVI using PFA. However, the freedom of AF has not yet proven superior to existing thermal ablation methods and appears similarly associated with suboptimal lesion durability, leading to electrical reconnection. The purpose of this study is to determine if freedom of atrial fibrillation may be improved by delivering more and better targeted pulsed field ablations. Patients will undergo the standard catheter ablation procedure in accordance with good clinical practice, performing pulmonary vein islolation (PVI) with the FARAPULSE cardiac ablation system. In the control group PVI will be performed with 4 basket- and 4 flower-shaped applications of the catheter, while in the study group 2 olive-, 4 basket-, and 6 flower shaped applications will be delivered at each vein. All other procedural steps will be the same between groups. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion with a block size of 4 to the study arm or the usual care (control) arm. The primary study parameter for efficacy is the freedom of atrial arrhythmias after the 2-month blanking period up to 18 months after the procedure. The secondary study outcomes include the extent and position of pulmonary vein reconnection observed during redo procedures that are performed due to arrhythmia recurrence, which constitutes a study endpoint. Furthermore, the study also evaluates arrhythmia burden after the procedure in centers that routinely use photoplethysmographic remote monitoring as standard care for all their ablation patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Standard of care 4 pulsed electrical field applications in basket shape and 4 applications in flower shape
Experimental treatment delivering 2 pulsed electrical field applications in olive shape, 4 in basket shape and 6 applications in flower shape
Time frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18
The primary efficacy outcome will be the freedom of arrhythmias lasting >30 seconds after a single PVI ablation procedure from the blanking period of 2 months until 18 months follow-up after ablation.
Any left-sided ablation procedure after a successful index procedure will count as treatment failure.
An atrioventricular (nodal) reentry tachycardia (AVNRT/AVRT), or typical right atrial flutter occurring after the index procedure, will not count as treatment failure.
Time frame: From procedure to 18-month follow-up
Compare the number of major adverse event between both study arms including (but not exclusively) cardiac tamponade, clinically relevant pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula, stroke, persisting phrenic nerve palsy, major bleeding (BARC criteria), hemolysis, cardiac arrest, death
Time frame: Baseline, month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18
QOL will be assessed with the Atrial Fibrillation Quality of Life Questionaire scoring system asking 18 question with a score on a scale of 1-7 and a range of 0-100. This will be compared between both study arms
Time frame: Post procedure every 24 hours, up to 5 days post procedure for each individual patient
Hemolysis will be assessed by testing urine-samples with hemosticks based on the grading system of the urine stick. In case of a positive urine-stick patients will undergo further diagnostic testing by blood test to determine severity of hemolysis. The number patients with hemolysis and the severity of hemolysis between the study arms will be evaluated
Time frame: Month 3, month 6, month 12, month 18.
Mapping of the electrical activity of each pulmonary vein will performed in each patient undergoing a repeat ablation procedure. The number and pattern of electrical reconnection will be compared between both study arms
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Isabelle N Bax, MD
CONTACT
Lucas VA Boersma, MD, PhD
CONTACT
R&D Cardiologie
Other
Acronym: DOPPIO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05378035
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT07492524
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Yancheng, Dongtai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07492498
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Yancheng, Dongtai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06099730
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details